Multilingual dependency parsing and domain adaptation using DeSR

EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1112-1118

  Attardi, Giuseppe ^a   Dell'Orletta, Felice ^a   Simi, Maria ^a   Chanev, Atanas ^b,c   Ciaramita, Massimiliano ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c ITC IRST   (Italy)

^d YAHOO RESEARCH   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSING; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; FEATURE MODELS; PARSING ALGORITHM; PERCEPTRON; SECOND ORDERS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FEATURE EXTRACTION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053362694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. A. Abeillé, editor. 2003. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer.
2. I. Aduriz, M. J. Aranzabe, J. M. Arriola, A. Atutxa, A. Diaz de Ilarraza, A. Garmendia and M. Oronoz. 2003. Construction of a Basque Dependency Treebank. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), 201-204.
3. G. Attardi. 2006. Experiments with a Multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. In Proc. of the Tenth CoNLL, 2006.
4. G. Attardi, M. Ciaramita. 2007. Tree Revision Learning for Dependency Parsing. In Proc. of NAACL/HLTC 2007.
5. A. Böhmová, J. Hajic, E. Hajicová and B. Hladká. 2003. The PDT: a 3-level annotation scenario. In Abeillé (2003), chapter 7, 103-127.
6. R. Brown. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Harvard University Press.
7. K. Chen, C. Luo, M. Chang, F. Chen, C. Chen, C. Huang and Z. Gao. 2003. Sinica Treebank: Design Criteria, Representational Issues and Implementation. In Abeillé (2003), chapter 13, 231-248.
8. M. Ciaramita, G. Attardi. 2007. Dependency Parsing with Second-Order Feature Maps and Annotated Semantic Information. Proc. of the 12th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), 2007.
9. K. Crammer, Y. Singer. 2003. Ultraconservative Online Algorithms for Multiclass Problems. Journ. of Machine Learning Research.
10. D. Csendes, J. Csirik, T. Gyimóthy, and A. Kocsor. 2005. The Szeged Treebank. Springer. Dg Annotator. 2006. http://medialab.di.unipi.it/ Project/Parser/DgAnnotator/.
11. J. Hajic, O. Smrz, P. Zemánek, J. Snaidauf and E. Beska. 2004. Prague Arabic Dependency Treebank: Development in Data and Tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR Intern. Conf. on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, 110-117.
12. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2007. Extended constituent-to-dependency conversion for English. In Proc. of the 16th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA).
13. S. Kulick, A. Bies, M. Liberman, M. Mandel, R. McDonald, M. Palmer, A. Schein, and L. Ungar. 2004. Integrated annotation for biomedical information extraction. In Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL).
14. B. MacWhinney. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
16. M. A. Martí, M. Taulé, L. Màrquez and M. Bertran. 2007. CESS-ECE: A Multilingual and Multilevel Annotated Corpus. Available for download from: http://www.lsi.upc.edu/∼mbertran/cess-ece/.
17. R. McDonald, et al. 2005. Non-projective Dependency Parsing using Spanning Tree Algorithms. In Proc. of HLT-EMNLP.
18. B. MacWhinney. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. S. Montemagni, F. Barsotti, M. Battista, N. Calzolari, O. Corazzari, A. Lenci, A. Zampolli, F. Fanciulli, M. Massetani, R. Raffaelli, R. Basili, M. T. Pazienza, D. Saracino, F. Zanzotto, N. Nana, F. Pianesi, and R. Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank. In Abeillé (2003), chapter 11, 189-210.
20. Mstparser 0.4.3. 2007 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mstparser/.
21. J. Nivre, et al. 2004. Memory-based Dependency Parsing. In Proc.s of the Eighth CoNLL, ed. H. T. Ng and E. Riloff, Boston, Massachusetts, 49-56.
22. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-Projective Dependency Parsing. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, 99-106.
23. J. Nivre and M. Scholz. 2004. Deterministic Dependency Parsing of English Text. In Proc. of COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland, 64-70.
24. J. Nivre, J. Hall, S. Kübler, R. McDonald, J. Nilsson, S. Riedel, and D. Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proc. of the CoNLL 2007 Shared Task. Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL).
25. K. Oflazer, B. Say, D. Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeillé (2003), chapter 15, 261-277.
26. M.F. Porter. 2001. Snowball Stemmer. http://www.snowball.tartarus.org/.
27. P. Prokopidis, E. Desypri, M. Koutsombogera, H. Papageorgiou, and S. Piperidis. 2005. Theoretical and practical issues in the construction of a Greek depen- dency treebank. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 149-160.
28. H. Schmid. 1994. Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. In Proc. of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing.
29. V. N. Vapnik. 1998. The Statistical Learning Theory. Springer.
30. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical Dependency Analysis with Support Vector Machines. In Proc. of the 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), 195-206.