Comparison the functional properties of protein Hydrolysates from poultry byproducts and rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) viscera

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 154-169

  Taheri, A ^a   Anvar, S A A ^b   Ahari, H ^b   Fogliano, V ^c  

^a Faculty of Marine Sciences   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alcalase; Functional properties; Poultry by products; Protein hydrolysate; Rainbow trout viscera

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS;

EID: 84873627039     PISSN: 15622916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adler-Nissen, J., 1986. Enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins. London: Elsevier Applied Science. 57-109.
2. Aluko, R. E. and Yada, R.Y., 1995. Structure-function relationships of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) globulin isolate:influence if pH and NaCl on physicochemical and functional properties. Food Chemistry, 53, 259-265.
3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1995. Official methods of analysis.16th ed. Washington, DC.
4. Balti, R., Bougatef, A., El-Hadj Ali, N., Zekri, D., Barkia, A. and Nasri, M., 2010. Influence of degree of hydrolysis on functional properties and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of protein hydrolysates from cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) by-products. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 90, 2006-2014.
5. Benjakul, S. and Morrissey, M., 1997. Protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting solid wastes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45, 3423-3430.
6. Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology,37,911-917.
7. Bueno-Solano, C., López-Cervantes, J., Campas-Baypoli, O. N., Lauterio-García, R., Adan-Bante, N. P. and Sánchez-Machado, D. I., 2008. Chemical and biological characteristics of protein hydrolysates from fermented shrimp by-products. Food chemistry, 112, 671-675.
8. Chiang, W. D., Shih, C. J. and Chu, Y. H., 1999. Functional properties of soy protein hydrolysate produced from a continuous membrane reactor system. Food Chemistry,65,189-194.
9. Chobert, J. M., Bertrand-Harb, C. and Nicolas, M. G., 1988. Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins and whey proteins modified enzymatically by trypsin. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 36, 883-886.
10. Clemente, A., 2000. Enzymatic protein hydrolysates in human nutrition. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 11, 254-262.
11. Damodaran, S., 1996. Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In O. R. Fennema (Ed.), Food chem. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 321-429.
12. Deeslie, W. D. and Cheryan, M., 1988. Functional properties of soy protein hydrolysates from a continuous ultrafiltration Reactor. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry,36, 26-31.
13. Diniz, A. M. and Martin, A. M., 1997. Optimization of nitrogen recovery in the enzymatic hydrolysis of dogfish (Squalus acanthias) protein: Composition of the hydrolysates. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 48, 191-200.
14. FAO STAT-Agriculture, 2011. Available at http://faostat.fao.org
15. [internet], FAO/WHO., 1985. Energy and protein requirements. Report of Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation Technical Report. FAO/WHO and United Nations University, Geneva, Series No. 724, 116-129.
16. Gbogouri, G. A., Linder, M., Fanni, J. and Parmentier, M., 2004. Influence of hydrolysis degree on the functional properties of salmon byproduct hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 69, 615-622.
17. Giménez, B., Gómez-Estaca, J., Alemán, A., Gómez-Guillén, M. C. and Montero, P., 2008. Physico-chemical and film forming properties of giant squid (Dosidicus gigas) gelatin. FoodHydrocolloid,23,585-92.
18. Guerard, F., Duffose, L., De La Broise, D. and Binet, A., 2001. Enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins from yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) wastes using alcalase. Journal of Molecular CatalysisB:Enzymatic,11,1051-1059.
19. Guérard, F., Guimas, L. and Binet, A., 2002. Production of tuna waste hydrolysates by a commercial neutral protease preparation. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 19-20, 489-498.
20. Hoyle, N. T. and Merritt, J. H., 1994. Quality of fish protein hydrolysate from Herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 59, 76-79.
21. Hunt, R. W. G., 1977. The specification of colour appearance. Concepts and terms. Color Research and Application,2,55-68.
22. Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D. and Shahidi, F., 2007. Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influence by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chemistry, 102, 1317-1327.
23. Kristinsson, H. G. and Rasco, B. A., 2000. Fish protein hydrolysates: Production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 40, 43-81.
24. Kunte, L. A., Gennadios, A., Cuppett, S. L., Hanna, M. A. and Weller, C. L., 1997. Cast films from soy protein isolates and fractions. Cereal Chemistry, 74, 115-118.
25. Liceaga-Gesualdo, A. M. and Li-Chan, E. C. Y., 1999. Functional Properties of Fish Protein Hydrolysate from Herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 64(6), 1000-1004.
26. Lin, C. S. and Zayas, J. F., 1987. Functional of defatted corn germ proteins in a model system: Fat binding and water retention. Journal of Food Science, 52, 1308-1311.
27. Linder, M., Fanni, J. and Parmentier, M., 1996. Functional properties of veal bone hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 61,712-6.
28. Martin, A. H., Grolle, K., Bos, M. A., Stuart, M. A. C. and VanVliet, T., 2002. Network forming properties of various proteins adsorbed at the air/water interface in relation to foam stability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 254, 175-183.
29. Nilsang, S., Lertsiri, S., Suphantharika, M. and Assavanig, A., 2005. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of fish soluble concentrate by commercial proteases. Journal of Food Engineering, 70, 571-578.
30. Ockerman, H. W. and Hansen, C. L., 2000. Poultry by-products. Ockerman, H. W., Hansen, C. L. (Eds.), Animal by Product Processing and Utilization. CRC press, New York, pp. 439-455.
31. Pacheco-Aguilar, R., Mazorra-Manzano, M. A. and Ramírez- Suárez, J. C., 2008. Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) muscle produced by a commercial protease. Food Chemistry, 109, 782-789.
32. Pearce, K. N. and Kinsella, J. E., 1978. Emulsifying properties of proteins: Evaluation of a turbidimetric technique. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 26, 716-723.
33. Phillips, L. G., Whitehead, D. M. and Kinsella, J. E., 1994. Protein stabilized foams. In L. G. Phillips, D. M. Whitehead, & J. E. Kinsella (Eds.), Structure-function of food proteins. New York, Academic Press. 131-152.
34. Rahali, V., Chobert, J. M., Haertlé, T. and Guéguen, J., 2000. Emulsification of chemical and enzymatic hydrolysates of b-lactoglobulin: Characterization of the peptides adsorbed at the interface. Nahrung/Food, 44, 89-95.
35. Robinson, H. W. and Hodgen, C. G., 1940. The biuret reaction in the determination of serum protein, A study of the condition necessary for the production of the stable color which bears a quantitative relationship to the protein concentration. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 135, 707-725.
36. Rodríguez-Ambriz, S. L., Martínez-Ayala, A. L., Millán, F. and Dávila-Ortiz, G., 2005. Composition and functional properties of Lupinus campestris protein isolates. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 60, 99-107.
37. Sathivel, S., Bechtel, P. J., Babbitt, J., Smiley, S., Crapo, C., Reppond, K. D., et al., 2003. Biochemical and functional properties of Herring (Clupea harengus) byproduct hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 68, 2196-2200.
38. Sathivel, S., Smiley, S., Prinyawiwatkul, W. and Bechtel, P. J., 2005. Functional and nutritional properties of red salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) enzymatic hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 70, 401-406.
39. Shahidi, F., Han, X. Q. and Synowiecki, J., 1995. Production and characteristics of protein hydrolysates from capelin (Mallotusvillosus). FoodChemistry,53,285-293.
40. Sikorski, Z. E., 2002. Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components. Second Edition. CRC Press LLC.
41. Sinha, R., Radha, C., Prakash, J. and Kaul, P., 2007. Whey protein hydrolysate: Functional properties, nutritional quality and utilization in beverage formulation. Food Chemistry, 101, 1484-1491.
42. Šližyte, R., Mozuraityte, R., Martínez-Alvarez, O., Falch, E., Fouchereau-Peron, M. and Rustad, T., 2009. Functional, Bioactive and Antioxidative Properties of Hydrolysates Obtained from Cod (Gadus morhua) Backbones. Process Biochemistry, 44, 668-677.
43. Sorgentini, D. A. and Wagner, J. R., 2002. Comparative study of foaming properties of whey and isolate soy bean proteins. Food Research International, 35, 721-729.
44. Sze-Tao, K. W. C. and Sathe, S. K., 2000. Functional properties and in vitro digestibility of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) protein isolate. Food Chemistry, 69, 153-160.
45. Taheri, A., Abedian Kenari, A. M., Gildberg, A. and Behnam, S., 2009. Extraction and physico-chemical characterisation of Greater lizardfish (Saurida tumbil) skin and bone gelatine. Journal of Food Science, 74, 160-165.
46. Taheri, A., Abedian Kenari, A., Motamedzadegan, A. and Habibi-Rezaei, M., 2011. Poultry By-Products Enzymatic Hydrolysis:Optimization by response Surface Methodology Using Alcalase®2.4L.International journal of Food Engineering,7(5),1-17.
47. Vieira, C., Biasutti, E., Capobianco, M., Afonso, W. and Silvestre, M., 2006. Effect of salt on the solubility and emulsifying properties of casein and its tryptic hydrolysates. Ars Pharmae, 47(3), 281-292.
48. Wasswa, J., Tang, J., Gu, X. H. and Yuan, X. Q., 2007. Influence of the extent of enzymatic hydrolysis on the functional properties of protein hydrolysate from grass carp skin. Food Chemistry, 104, 1698-1704.
49. Wilde, P. J. and Clark, D. C., 1996. The competitive displacement of blactoglobulin by Tween 20 from oil-water and air-water interfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 155, 48-54.