Collaborating to meet language challenges in indigenous mathematics classrooms

Collaborating to Meet Language Challenges in Indigenous Mathematics Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-309

  Meaney, Tamsin ^a   Trinick, Tony ^b   Fairhall, Uenuku ^c  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Te Koutu   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873526999     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1994-1     Document Type: Book

References (349)

1. Addison, J., & Te Whare, W. (n.d.). Arhythmetic-kanikani pāngarau
2. Adu-Ampona, S. M. (1975). African languages in the teaching of science, mathematics and technology. Science Teacher, 19(5-6), 21-26.
3. Albert, L. (2000). Outside-in - inside-out: Seventh grade students’ mathematical thought processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 109-141.
4. Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2009). Inter-viewing foregrounds: Students’ motives for learning in a multicultural setting. In M. César & K. Kumpulainen (Eds.), Social interactions in multicultural settings (pp. 13-37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
6. Amir, G. S., & Williams, J. S. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18(1), 85-107.
7. Amit, M., & Jan, I. (2006). Autodidactic learning of probabilistic concepts through games. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 49-56). Prague: PME.
8. Anghileri, J. (2002). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 49-56). Norwich, UK: UEA.
9. Annamalai, E. (1979). Movement for linguistic purism. The case of Tamil. In E. Annamalai (Ed.), Language movements in India (pp. 35-39). Mysore: Centre for Indian Languages.
10. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/Pāngarau: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
11. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2008). On the practise of practice: In-tensions and ex-tensions in the ongoing reconfiguration of practices. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 112-131). Los Angeles: Sage.
12. Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412-431.
13. Appleby, P. (2002). Kura kaupapa Māori: Tomorrow’s schools and beyond. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 11, 105-121.
14. Apthorp, H. S., D’Amato, E. D., & Richardson, A. (2003). Effective standards-based practices for native American Indians: A review of the literature. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
15. Au, K. H. (1980). Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children: Analysis of a culturally appropriate instructional event. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11(2), 91-115.
16. Bakalevu, S. L. (1999). The language factor in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2), 59-68.
17. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241-247.
18. Barbour, R., & Keegan, T. T. (1996). Education in technologies for LCTLs: Ngā tautono rorohiko. NFLRC 1996 summer institute symposium: New technologies for less commonly taught languages conference, June-July, 1996. Retrieved from http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~tetaka/PDF/EducationInTechnology.pdf.
19. Barton, B., & Cleave, P. (1989). He kupu tikanga tau ahuatanga. Special edition of Nga Mauranga Auckland: MECA: Auckland College of Education.
20. Barton, B., & Fairhall, U. (1995a). Mathematics in Māori education. Mathematics Education Unit, Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
21. Barton, B., & Fairhall, U. (1995b). Is mathematics a Trojan horse? In B. Barton & U. Fairhall (Eds.), Mathematics inMāori mathematics Mathematics Education Unit, Auckland: University of Auckland.
22. Barton, B., Fairhall, U., & Trinick, T. (1995). Whakatupu reo tatai: History of the development of Māori mathematics vocabulary SAMEpapers. Hamilton: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
23. Barton, B., Fairhall, U., & Trinick, T. (1998). Tikanga reo tatai: Issues in the development of a Māori mathematics register. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 3-9.
24. Begg, A. (1991, November). Mathematika Pasefika UNESCO conference Hamilton: New Zealand.
25. Begg, A. (1999, July). Learning theories and mathematics: A, B, C, D and E. Paper presented at the sixth biennial conference of the New Zealand Association of Mathematics Teachers, Dunedin, New Zealand.
26. Ben-Chaim, B., Lappan, G., & Houang, R. T. (1989). Adolescents’ ability to communicate spatial information: Analyzing and effecting students’ performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 121-146.
27. Benko, P., & Maher, C. (2006). Students constructing representations for outcomes of experiments. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 137-143). Prague: PME.
28. Benton, R. (1996). The Māori language in New Zealand. In S. Wurm, P. Mühlhäusler, & T. Tryon (Eds.), Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas (pp. 167-172). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
29. Benton, R. A. (1991). The Māori language: Dying or reviving? Working paper prepared for the East-West Centre Alumni - in-Residence Working Paper. Hawaii: East-West Centre.
30. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.
31. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Berry, J. (1985). Learning mathematics in a second language: Some cross cultural issues. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(2), 18-21.
33. Best, E., (1907). Māori numeration. The vigesimal system. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 16, 94-98.
34. Bickmore-Brand, J., & Gawned, S. (1990). Scaffolding for improved mathematical understanding. In J. Bickmore-Brand (Ed.), Language in mathematics. Melbourne: Australian Reading Association.
35. Bicknell, B. (1999). The writing of explanations and justifications in mathematics: Differences and dilemmas. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 75-83), 4-7 July 1999. Adelaide: MERGA.
36. Bill, V. L., Leer, M. N., Reams, L. E., & Resnick, L. B. (1992). From cupcakes to equations: The structure of discourse in a primary mathematics classroom. Verbum, 1-2, 63-85.
37. Bills, C. (2002). Linguistic pointers in young children’s descriptions of mental calculations. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 97-104). Norwich: PME.
38. Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
39. Bishop, R. (2007). Māori education. In A. W. H. Timperley, H. Barrar, & I. Fung (Eds.), Best evidence synthesis: Teacher professional development (pp. xvi-xix). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
40. Bishop, R. (2008). A culturally responsive pedagogy of relations. In C. McGee & D. Fraser (Eds.), The professional practice of teaching (3rd ed., pp. 154-171). Melbourne: CENGAGE Learning.
41. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Tiakiwai, S., & Richardson, C. (2003). Te Kotahitanga: The experiences of year 9 and 10Māori students in mainstream classrooms. Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
42. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2001, September). Inside the blackbox: Raising the standards through classroom assessment. British Education Research Association Conference, 13-15 September 2001, Leeds University. Retrieved from http://www.collegenet.co.uk/admin/download/inside% 20the%20black%20box_23_doc.pdf.
43. Bonner, P. J. (2006). Transformation of teacher attitude and approach to math instruction through collaborative action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 27-44.
44. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., &Walsh, P. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
45. Boyce, M. (2005). Attitudes to Māori. In A. Bell, R. Harlow, & D. Starks (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 86-110). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
46. Brenner, M. E. (1998). Adding cognition to the formula for culturally relevant instruction in mathematics. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(2), 214-244.
47. Brett, A., Rothlein, L., & Hurley, M. (1996). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories and explanations of target words. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 415-422.
48. Brewer, J. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
49. Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, 1(3), 185-216.
50. Brown, M., Jones, K., Taylor, R., & Hirst, A. (2004). Developing geometrical reasoning. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010: Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 127-134). Townsville: MERGA.
51. Brown, T. (1997). Mathematics education and language: Interpreting Hermeneutics and Poststructuralism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
52. Bull, A., Brooking, K., & Campbell, R. (2008). Successful home-school partnerships: A report to the ministry. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
53. Burkhill, R., & Bye, K. (2005). Action research: Using formative assessment strategies to raise student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/ncea/for…/ actionresusingformassessment.pdf.
54. Burns, M. (2005). The building blocks of math. Instructor, 115(3), 42-43.
55. Burton, L., & Morgan, C. (2000). Mathematicians writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 429-453.
56. Butterworth, B., & Reeve, R. (2008). Verbal counting and spatial strategies in numerical tasks: Evidence from Indigenous Australia. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 443-457.
57. Campbell, A. E., Adams, V. M., & Davis, G. (2007). Cognitive demands and second language learners: A framework for analysing mathematics instructional contexts. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 3-30.
58. Campbell, P., & Rowan, T. (1997). Teacher questions + student language + diversity = mathematical power. In J. Trentacosta & M. Kenney (Eds.), Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematical classroom the gift of diversity (pp. 60-70). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
59. Cantoni, G. (1991, Fall). Applying a cultural compatibility model to the teaching of mathematics to indigenous populations. Journal of Navojo Education, IX(1), 33-42.
60. Carr, M., McGee, C., Jones, A., Bell, B., Barr, H., & Simpson, T. (2005). The effects of curricula and assessment on pedagogical approaches and on educational outcomes. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
61. Carrasquillo, A. L., & Rodriguez, V. (1996). Language minority students in the mainstream classroom. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
62. Castle, K., & Aichele, D. B. (1994). Professional development and teacher autonomy. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics 1994 yearbook (pp. 1-8). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.
63. Cavalcanti, M. C. (2004). ‘It’s not writing by itself that is going to solve our problems’: Questioning a mainstream ethnocentric myth as part of a search for self-sustained development. Language and Education, 18(4), 317-325.
64. Chapman, A. (1997). Towards a model of language shifts in mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 152-172.
65. Chapple, S., Jeffries, R., & Walker, R. (1997). Māori participation and performance in education. A literature review and research programme. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
66. Chick, H., & Baker, M. (2005). Teaching elementary probability: Not leaving it to chance. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 233-231). Melbourne: MERGA.
67. Christensen, I. (2003). Exploring issues in mathematics education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
68. Christensen, I., Trinick, T., & Keegan, P. J. (2003, June). Pāngarau curriculum framework and map: Levels 2-6: asTTle technical report 38. Auckland: University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
69. Clarke, D. J. (1996). Assessment. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 327-370). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
70. Clarke, D. J., Waywood, A., & Stephens, M. (1993). Probing the structure of mathematical writing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 235-250.
71. Clarkson, P. C. (1991). Bilingualism and mathematics learning. Geelong: Deakin University.
72. Cleghorn, A. (1992). Primary level science in Kenya: Constructing meaning through English and Indigenous languages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(4), 311-323.
73. Closs, M. P. (1977). A survey of mathematics development in the new world: Report 410-77-0222. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.
74. Clyne, M. (1997). Introduction. In M. Clyne (Ed.), Undoing and redoing corpus planning (pp. 1-10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
75. Cobarrubias, J., & Fisherman, J. A. (Eds.). (1983). Progress in language planning: International perspectives. Berlin: Mouton.
76. Cocking, R. R., & Mestre, J. P. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on mathematics learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
79. Crowley, T. (1998). How many languages will survive in the Pacific? Te Reo, 41, 116-125.
80. Dale, D. C., & Cueras, G. J. (1987). Integrating language and mathematics learning. In J. Crandell (Ed.), ESL through content-area instruction (pp. 9-23). Regents, NJ: Prentice Hall.
81. Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. London: Bergin & Garvey.
82. Dawe, L. (1983). Bilingualism and mathematical reasoning in English as a second language. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 325-353.
83. Denny, J. P. (1986). Cultural ecology of mathematics: Ojibway and Inuit hunters. In M. Closs (Ed.), Native American mathematics (pp. 129-180). Austin: University of Texas Press.
84. Dewaele, J.-M. (2007). Multilinguals’ language choice for mental calculation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3-4, 343-376.
85. Dewalt, M. W., & Troxell, B. K. (1989). Old order Mennonite one-room school: A case study. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20(4), 308-325.
86. Dixon, R. (1991). The endangered language of Australia, Indonesia and Oceania. In R. Robins & E. Uhlenbeck (Eds.), Endangered languages. Oxford, NY: Berg.
87. Doerr, H. M., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2009). Negotiating the literacy demands of standards based curriculum materials: A site for teachers’ learning. In A. Schoenfeld (Series Ed.) & J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. Lloyd (Vol. Ed.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 282-301). New York: Routledge.
88. Drake, B. M., & Amspaugh, L. B. (1994). What writing reveals in mathematics. Focus on learning problems in mathematics, 16(3), 43-50.
89. Draper, R. J. (2002). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-orientated math classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(6), 520-529.
90. Duncombe, R., & Kathleen, A. (2004). Collaborative professional learning: From theory to practice. Journal of In-Service Education, 30(1), 141-166.
91. Durie, M. (2003). Ngā kāhui pou: Launching Māori futures. Wellington: Huia Publishers.
92. Durkin, K., & Shire, B. (1991). Language in mathematics education: Research and practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
93. Earp, R. (2004, September). The treaty of Waitangi and Māori health. Paper presented at the National Forum on Indigenous Health and the Treaty Debate, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
94. Education Review Office. (2002). The performance of Kura Kaupapa Māori. Wellington: Author.
95. Ellerton, N., & Clements, M. A. (1990). Language factors in mathematics learning: A review. In K. Milton & H. McCann (Eds.), Mathematical turning points: Strategies for the 1990s: Proceedings of the13th biennial conference of the Australian Association of mathematics teachers (Vol. 1, pp. 230-258). Hobart: The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
96. Esty, W. (1992). Language concepts of mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 14(4), 31-54.
97. Evans, S. W. (2006). Differential performance of items in mathematics assessment materials for 7-year-old pupils in English-medium and Welsh-medium versions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 145-168.
98. Fairhall, U., & Keegan, P. (2002, June). Mapping the pāngarau curriculum: Levels 2-4: asTTle technical report 13. Auckland: University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
99. Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A., Lopes, H., Petrovsky, A. V., Rahnema, M., et al. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
100. Finlayson, R., & Madiba, M. (2002). The intellectualisation of the Indigenous languages of South Africa: Challenges and prospects. Current Issues in Language Planning, 3(1), 40-61.
101. Fishman, J. (2006). Do not leave your language alone. The hidden status agendas within corpus planning in language policy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
102. Flockton, L., Crooks, T., Smith, J., & Smith, L. F. (2006). National education monitoring report 37. Mathematics: Assessment results 2005. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago, Education Assessment Research Unit.
103. Forbes, S. (2005). Potential uses of longitudinal analyses to investigate education outcomes. Paper presented at the IASE sessions at the 55th session of the International Statistical Institute, 5-12 April 2005, Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac. nz/~iase/publications.php?show=13.
104. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689.
105. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed, M. Bergman Ramos (trans., reprint ed.). London: Penguin Books.
106. Fryer, K., Kalafatelis, E., & Palmer, S. (2009). New Zealanders’ use of broadcasting and related media: Final report. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
107. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national samples of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
108. Garrett, M. (1996). Two people: An American Indian narrative of bicultural identity. Journal of American Indian Education, 36(1), 1-21.
109. Garvin, P. (1973). Some comments on language planning. In J. Rubin & R. Shy (Eds.), Language planning: Current issues and research (pp. 24-73). Washington: George Town University Press.
110. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
111. Gee, J. P. (1989). Orality and literacy: From the savage mind to ways with words. Journal of Education, 171(1), 39-60.
112. Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.
113. Gibbons, P. (1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12(2), 99-118.
114. Gibbs, W., & Orton, J. (1994). Language and mathematics: Issues in mathematics. London: Cassells.
115. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A realistic approach. White Plains, NY: Longman.
116. Goodson, I. F. (1999). Representing teachers. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Researching school experience. London: Falmer Press.
117. Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, Michel Foucault, C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J.Mepham, & K. Soper (trans.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
118. Graham, B. (1988). Mathematical education and Aboriginal children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 119-135.
119. Green, D. R. (1983). A survey of probability concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11-16 years. In D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, & G. M. Constable (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on teaching statistics (pp. 766-783). Sheffield, UK: Teaching Statistics Trust.
120. Grin, F., & Vaillancourt, F. (1998). Language revitalisation policy: An analytical survey. Theoretical framework, policy experience and revitalisation of Te Reo Māori (Report to treasury). Wellington: New Zealand Treasury.
121. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73.
122. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a socialsemiotic perspective. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
123. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
124. Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162-178). London: Pinter Publishers.
125. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
126. Halliday, M. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5(2), 93-116.
127. Hamilton, D.,& McWilliam, E. (2001). Ex-centric voices that frame research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington: AERA.
128. Harlow, R. (1993). A science and mathematics terminology for Māori SAMEpapers. Hamilton: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
129. Harlow, R. (2001). A Māori reference grammar. Auckland: Pearson Education Ltd.
130. Harlow, R. (2003). Issues in Māori language planning and revitalisation. He puna kōrero. Journal of Māori & Pacific Development, 4(1), 32-43.
131. Harris, S. (1980). Culture and learning: Tradition and education in northern Arnhem Land. Darwin: Professional Services Branch, Northern Territory Education Department.
132. Hemara, W. (2000). Māori Pedagogies. A view from the literature. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
133. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2002). Using student contributions and multiple representations to develop mathematical language. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(2), 100-105.
134. Hindley, R. (1990). The death of the Irish language: A qualified obituary. London: Routledge.
135. Hinton, L., & Hale, K. (2001). The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego: Academic Press.
136. Hipkins, R., & Neill, A. (2006). Shifting balances - The impact of level 1 NCEA on the teaching of mathematics and science. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
137. Hohepa, M. K. (2006). Biliterate practices in the home: Supporting language regeneration. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 5(4), 293-315.
138. Hollings, M. (2005). Māori language broadcasting: Panacea or pipedream. In A. Bell, R. Harlow, & D. Starks (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 111-130). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
139. Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.). (1996). Indigenous literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up. Berlin: Mouton.
140. Hornberger, N. H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language Policy, 1, 27-51.
141. Hurrell, A. (1981). Language in mathematics lessons. Nairobi: National University of Lesotho.
142. Hynds, A. (2008). Developing and sustaining open communication in action research initiatives: A response to Kemmis (2006). Educational Action Research, 16(2), 149-162.
143. Irwin, K. (1992, November). Māori research methods and processes: An exploration and discussion. NZARE/AARE Annual Conference, November, 1992, Geelong. Retrieved from http:// www.aare.edu.au/92pap/irwik92373.txt.
144. Irwin, K., & Davis, L. (1994). Māori education in 1994: A review and discussion. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 4, 77-104.
145. Jaberg, P., Lubinski, C., & Yazujian, T. (2002). One teacher’s journey to change her mathematics teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 4, 3-14.
146. Jackson, W. (2009). Māori should be compulsory. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/opinion/2703436/Maoori-should-be-compulsory.
147. Jernudd, B. H., & Neustupny, J. V. (1987). Language planning: for whom? Paper presented at the Actes du Colloque international sur l’aménagement linguistique/Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Language Planning, 25-29 May 1986, Quebec.
148. Johanning, D. I. (2000). An analysis of writing and postwriting group collaboration in middle school pre-algebra. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 151-160.
149. Johnson, T. M., Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. W., Langrall, C. W., & Rous, A. (1998). Students’ thinking and writing in the context of probability. Written Communication, 15(2), 203-229.
150. Jones, A., McCulloch, G., Marshall, J. D., Smith, G. H., & Smith, L. T. (1990). Myths and realities: Schooling in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
151. Jones, G. A. (1974). The performance of first, second, and third grade children on five concepts of probability and the effects of grade, IQ, and embodiments on their performances. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
152. Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1997). A framework for assessing young children’s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 101-125.
153. Jones, M. C. (1998). Language obsolescence and revitalisation: Linguistic change in two sociolinguistically contrasting Welsh communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
154. Kamira, R. (2003). Te mata o te tai - The edge of the tide: Rising capacity in information technology of Māori in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The Electronic Library, 21(5), 465-475. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=862026&show=pdf.
155. Kaplan, R., & Baldauf, R. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
156. Kaplan, R. B. (1989). Language planning vs planning language. In C. N. Candlin & T. F. McNamara (Eds.), Language, learning and community (pp. 193-203). Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.
157. Karetu, T. (1995). Māori language rights in New Zealand. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & R. Pillipson (Eds.), Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination (pp. 209-218). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
158. Kazima, M. (2006). Malawian students’ meanings for probability vocabulary. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 169-189.
159. Keegan, P. (2005). The development of Māori vocabulary. In A. Bell, R. Harlow, & D. Starks (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 131-150). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
160. Keegan, T. T. (1998). Reflections on 5 years of teaching computing through the medium of the Māori language. In M. S. Brown (Ed.), Conference proceedings for beyond the Fringe: Learning development conference, 2-3 July, 1998 (pp. 51-55). Hamilton: Waikato University.
161. Kemmis, S. (2009, October). What is to be done? The place of action research. Paper presented at the Collaborative Action Research Network Annual Conference Athens, 30 October-1 November 2009, Greece.
162. Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling Praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37-64). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
163. Kennedy, M. (1997). Defining optimal knowledge for teaching science and mathematics: Research monograph no. 10. Wisconsin-Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
164. Kermani, H., & Brenner, M. E. (1996, April). Maternal scaffolding in the child’s zone of proximal development: Cultural perspectives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, NY.
165. Kerswill, P. (1996). Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change, 8, 177-202.
166. Khisty, L. L., & Chevl, K. B. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(3), 154-168.
167. Kimura, L., & April, I. (2009). Indigenous new words creation: Perspectives from Alaska and Hawai’i. In J. Reyhner & L. Lockard (Eds.), Indigenous language revilitzation: Encouragement, guidance and lessons learned (pp. 121-139). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.
168. Knight, L., & Hargis, C. (1977). Math language ability: Its relationship to reading in math. Language Arts, 54, 423-428.
169. Knijnik, G. (2000, March). Re-searching mathematics education from a critical perspective. Paper presented at the Second Mathematics Education and Society Conference (MES2), Montechoro, Algarve, Portugal.
170. Kokiri, T. P. (2007). Survey of the health of the Māori language in 2006. Wellington: Te Puni Kokiri.
171. Kura Kaupapa Māori Working Group, & Katarina Mataira (Chair). (1989). Te Aho Matua. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
172. Lange, D. (1988). Tomorrow’s schools: The reform of educational administration in New Zealand. Wellington: Government Printer.
173. Lange, T. (2008). Homework and minority students in difficulties with learning mathematics: The influence of public discourse. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 51-68.
174. Leap, W. (1982). Semilingualism as a form of linguistic proficiency. In R. S. Clair & W. Leap (Eds.), Language renewal among American Indian tribes: Issues, problems and prospects (pp. 149-159). Rosslyn, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
175. Learning Media. (1991). Nga Kupu Tikanga Pangarau: Mathematics vocabulary. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
176. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality, M. J. Hall (trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
177. Lerman, S. (2007). Directions for literacy research in science and mathematics education. International Journal for Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 755-759.
178. Leung, C. (2005). Mathematical vocabulary: Fixers of knowledge or points of exploration. Language and Education, 19(2), 1227-1135.
179. Liddicoat, A. J., & Bryant, P. (2002). Intellectualisation: A current issue in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 3(1), 1-4.
180. Lieberman, A., & Mace, D. H. P. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 226-234.
181. Lim, C. S., & Ellerton, N. (2009). Malaysian experiences of teaching mathematics in English: Political dilemma versus reality. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 9-16). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
182. Lipka, J. (1994, May). Culturally negotiated schooling: Toward a Yup’ik mathematics classroom. Journal of American Indian Education, 33(3), 14-30.
183. Lipka, J., Hogan, M. P., Webster, J. P., Yanez, E., Adams, B., Clark, S., et al. (2005). Math in a cultural context: Two case studies of a successful culturally based math project. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(4), 367-385.
184. Lipka, J., Mohatt, G. V., & Cisulistet Group. (1998). Transforming the culture of schools: Yup’ik Eskimo examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
185. Love, E., & Tahta, D. (1991). Reflections on some words used in mathematics education. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Eds.), Teaching and learning school mathematics. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
186. Lozare, D. K. (1993). TheMohawk standardization project: Conference report, A. K. Jacobs, N. K. Thompson, & M. K. Leaf (trans. into English). Retrieved from http://www.kanienkehaka.com/msp/msp.htm.
187. MacFarlane, A. (2004). Kia Hiwa Ra! Listen to culture. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
188. Marks, G., & Mousley, J. (1990). Mathematics education and genre: Dare we make the process writing mistake again? In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian systemic linguistic conference (pp. 142-158). Geelong: Deakin University.
189. Matthews, N. (2004). The physicality of the Māori message transmission: Ko te tinana, he waka tuku kōrero. Junctures, 3, 9-18.
190. May, S. (2000). Accommodating and resisting minority language policy: The case of Wales. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 3, 101-128.
191. May, S. (2004). Māori-medium education in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In J. W. Tollefson & A. B. M. Tsu (Eds.), Medium of instruction policies (pp. 21-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
192. May, S., & Hill, R. (2005). Bilingual education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: At the cross-roads. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Bilingualism, 30 April-May 3 2003, Arizona State University (pp. 1567-1573). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
193. McCarty, T. L. (1989). School as community: The Rough Rock demonstration. Harvard Educational Review, 59(4), 484-503.
194. McDonald, M. (1989). We are not French! Language, culture and identity in Brittany. London: Routledge.
195. McKinley, E. (1995). A power/knowledge nexus: Writing a science curriculum in Māori, science education. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
196. McKinley, E., & Keegan, P. (2008). Curriculum and language in Aotearoa New Zealand: From science to pūtaiao. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1), 135-147.
197. McMurchy-Pilkington, C. (2004). Pangarau Māori medium mathematics curriculum: Empowerment or New Hegemonic Accord. Unpublished Ed.D., University of Auckland, Auckland.
198. McMurchy-Pilkington, C. (2008). Indigenous people: Emancipatory possibilities in curriculum development. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(3), 614-638.
199. McMurchy-Pilkington, C., & Trinick, T. (2002). Horse power or empowerment? Mathematics curriculum for Māori - Trojan horse revisited. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific: Twenty-fifth annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 465-472). Auckland: MERGA.
200. McMurchy-Pilkington, C., Trinick, T., Dale, H., & Tuwhangai, R. (2009). Mahi tahi: Collaborating partnerships. In T. Trinick (Ed.), Quality teaching research and development project: Māori medium and Kura Kaupapa Māori research projects (pp. 63-75). Auckland: The University of Auckland.
201. McNaughton, S., MacDonald, S., Barber, J., Farry, S., & Woodard, H. (2006). Ngā Taumatua: Research on literacy practices and language development (Te Reo) in years 0-1 in Māori medium classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/maori_ education/5251.
202. Meaney, T. (2001). An ethnographic case study of a community-negotiated mathematics curriculum development project. Unpublished PhD thesis dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland.
203. Meaney, T. (2002). Aspects of written performance in mathematics learning. In K. Irwin, B. Barton, M. Pfannkuch, &M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics in the South Pacific: Proceedings of the 25th mathematics education research group of Australasia conference, 7-10 July 2002, Auckland (Vol. 2, pp. 481-488). Auckland: University of Auckland.
204. Meaney, T. (2005a). Mathematics as text. In A. Chronaki & I. M. Christiansen (Eds.), Challenging perspectives in mathematics classroom communication (pp. 109-141). Westport, CT: Information Age.
205. Meaney, T. (2005b). The use of algebra in senior high school students’ justifications. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice: Proceedings of the 28th mathematics education research group of Australasia, Melbourne (pp. 537-544). Sydney: MERGA.
206. Meaney, T. (2006a). Really that’s probably about roughly what goes down: Hesitancies and uncertainties in mathematics assessment interactions. Language and Education, 20(5), 374-390.
207. Meaney, T. (2006b). Mathematics register acquisition. Set, 3, 39-43.
208. Meaney, T. (2007). Weighing up the influence of context on judgements of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(4), 681-704.
209. Meaney, T., & Fairhall, U. (2003). Tensions and possibilities: Indigenous parents doing mathematics education curriculum development. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert, & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunities: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 507-514). Sydney: MERGA.
210. Meaney, T., Fairhall, U., & Trinick, T. (2007). Te Reo Tātaitai: Developing rich mathematical language in Māori immersion classrooms. Wellington: NZCER.
211. Meaney, T., Fairhall, U., & Trinick, T. (2008). The role of language in ethnomathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 3(1). Available from http://nasgem.rpi.edu/pl/journalmathematics- culture-volume-3-number-1.
212. Meaney, T., Lange, T., & Valero, P. (2009). Dispositions and changed teacher practice in mathematics. AARE 2009 Conference Proceedings, 29 November-3 December 2009 Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/09pap/mea091367.pdf.
213. Meaney, T., McMurchy-Pilkington, C., & Trinick, T. (2008). Mathematics education and Indigenous students. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W.-T. Seah, P. Sullivan, & S. Willis (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004-2007 (pp. 119-139). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
214. Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhall, U. (2009a). ‘The conference was awesome’: social justice and a mathematics teachers conference. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 445-462.
215. Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhall, U. (2009b). Mathematics: She’ll be write!Wellington: NZCER.
216. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
217. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
218. Middleton, J. (2010). Ka rangona te reo: The development of Māori-language television boadcasting in Aotearoa New Zealand. Te Kaharoa, 3, 146-176. Retrieved from http://www.tekaharoa. com/index.php/tekaharoa/article/viewPDFInterstitial/73/43.
219. Ministry of Education. (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum Wellington: Learning Media.
220. Ministry of Education. (1996). Pāngarau i roto i te marautanga o Aotearoa. TeWhanganui ā Tara: Te Pou Taki Kōrero.
221. Ministry of Education. (2004). Te Reo Pāngarau. Wellington: Learning Media.
222. Ministry of Education. (2006). The number framework. Wellington: Learning Media.
223. Ministry of Education. (2008a). Te Marautanga o Aotearoa. Wellington: Learning Media.
224. Ministry of Education. (2008b). Book 1: The number framework. Wellington: Author.
225. Ministry of Education. (2009a). Te reo Pūtaiao. A Māori language dictionary of science. Palmerston North: He Kupenga Hao i te Reo.
226. Ministry of Education. (2009b). Poutama Tau Evaluations 2008: Research findings in Pāngarau for years 1-10. Wellington: Learning Media.
227. Ministry of Education. (2010). Te Reo Pāngarau. Putanga Tuarua. A Māori language dictionary of mathematics. Wellington: Learning Media.
228. Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer Press.
229. Morris, R. W. (1975). Linguistic problems encountered by contemporary curriculum projects in mathematics. Paper presented at the Interactions between linguistics and mathematical education - September 1-11, 1974, Nairobi, Kenya.
230. Moskal, B. M., & Magone, M. E. (2000). Making sense of what students know: Examining the referents, relationships andmodes students displayed in response to a decimal task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 313-335.
231. Mousley, J. (1999). Perceptions of mathematical understanding. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 388-395). Adelaide: MERGA.
232. Murphy, H., McKinley, S., & Bright, N. (2008). Whakamanahia Te Reo Māori. Wellington: Te Pouherenga Kaiako o Aotearoa (New Zealand Teachers Council).
233. Murray, D. (2000). Haka fracas: The dialectics of identity in discussions of a contempory Māori dance. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 11(3), 345-357.
234. Murray, S. (2007). Achievement at Māori immersion and bilingual schools: Update for 2005 results. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
235. Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207.
236. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
237. Nelson-Barber, S., & Estrin, E. (1995). Culturally responsive mathematics and science education for native students. San Francisco: Regional Educational Laboratory Network.
238. New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2001). Ao kawe kupu. Retrieved 17/10/09, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/for-maori/publications/akk/akk-0102/count.html#te.
239. Ní Rîordaín, M. (2010, March). When did it all go right? The socio-political development of Gaeilge as a medium for learning mathematics in Ireland. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.) Proceedings of 6th international mathematics education and society conference, 20-25 March 2010, Berlin (pp. 340-349). Berlin: Freie Universität. Available from http://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/en/v/mes6/research_papers/index.html.
240. Nickson, M. (2000). Teaching and learning mathematics: A teacher’s guide to recent research and its application. London: Cassel.
241. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
242. O’Halloran, K. L. (2000). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359-388.
243. Olssen, M., & Mathews, K. M. (Eds.). (1997). Education policy in New Zealand: The 1990s and beyond. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
244. Onyango, J. (2005). Issues in national language terminology development in Kenya. Swahili Forum, 12, 219-234.
245. Peddie, R. (2005). Planning for the future? Language policy in New Zealand. In A. Bell, R. Harlow, & D. Starks (Eds.), Languages in New Zealand (pp. 30-58). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
246. Pere, R. R. (1982). Ako: Concepts and learning in the Māori tradition. Working paper no. 17. Hamilton: University of Waikato Department of Sociology.
247. Pere, R. T. (1997). Te Wheke: A celebration of infinite wisdom. Gisborne: Ao Ako Global Learning New Zealand.
248. Pihama, L., Smith, K., Taki, M., & Lee, J. (2004). A literature review on Kaupapa Māori and Māori Education Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://elearning.itpnz.ac.nz/.
249. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
250. Pimm, D., & Wagner, D. (2003). Investigation, mathematics, mathematics education and genre: An essay review of Candia Morgan’s writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 159-117.
251. Pohatu, T. (1996). Tipu ai Tatau i Ngā Turi ō Tatau Mātaua-Tīpuna. Transmission and Acquisition processes within Kāwai Whakapapa. Unpublished thesis for Education Masters University of Auckland, Auckland.
252. Pollitt, A., & Ahmed, A. (1999). A new model of the question answering process. Paper presented at the International Association for Educational Assessment, May 1999, Bled, Slovenia. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/digitalAssets/113788_A_New_Model_of_the_Question_Answering_Process.pdf.
253. Pollitt, A., Marriott, C., & Ahmed, A. (2000). Language, contextual and cultural constraints on examination performance. Paper presented at the International Association for Educational Assessment, May, 2000, Jerusalem, Israel. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment. org.uk/ca/digitalAssets/113940_Language__Contextual___Cultural_Constraints_on_Exam_Performa.pdf.
254. Pugalee, D. (2004). A comparison of verbal and written descriptions of students’ problem solving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 27-47.
255. Radford, L. (2003a). On the epistemological limits of language: Mathematical knowledge and social practice during the Renaissance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 123-150.
256. Radford, L. (2003b). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalisations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
257. Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 218-234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
258. Radford, L., & Empey, H. (2007). Culture, knowledge and the self: Mathematics and the formation of new social sensibilities in the Renaissance and Medieval Islam. Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática, Especial 1, 231-254.
259. Rau, C. (2001). He Ara Angitu, a pathway to success: A framework for capturing the literacy achievement of year one students in Māori medium. Paper presented at the Assessment Hui for the Ministry of Education, Wellington, September 2001. Retrieved from http://www.kiaatamai. org.nz/angitu/index.htm.
260. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243-263.
261. Reedy, S. K. (1999). Word problems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
262. Reedy, T. (2000). Te reoMāori: The past 20 years and looking forward. Oceanic Linguistics, 39(1), 157-169.
263. Roberts, T. (1998). Mathematical registers in Aboriginal languages. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 10-16.
264. Rogoff, B. (1988). The joint socialisation of development by young children and adults. In A. Gellatly, D. Rogers, & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Cognition and social worlds (pp. 57-82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
265. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 365-392.
266. Rutene, J., Candler, G., & Watson, S. (2003). Māori-medium education. Education Now, 2, 1-11.
267. Salmond, A. (1975). Hui: A study of Māori ceremonial gatherings. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed Ltd.
268. Salmond, A. (1997). Between worlds: Early exchanges between Māori and Europeans. Auckland: Penguin Books (NZ) Ltd.
269. Schäfer, M. (2010). Mathematics registers in Indigenous languages: Experiences from South Africa. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 509-514). Fremantle, WA: MERGA.
270. Schatzchi, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050876.
271. Schindler, D. E., & Davison, D. M. (1985). Language, culture and the mathematics concepts of American Indian learners. Journal of American Indian Education, 24(3), 27-34.
272. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 139-159.
273. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. USA: Basic Books.
274. Sellarés, J. A., & Toussaint, G. (2003). On the role of kinesthetic thinking in computational geometry. International Journal of Mathematics in Science and Technology, 34(2), 219-237.
275. Setati, M. (1998). Code-switching in a senior primary class of second language mathematics learners. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 34-40.
276. Setati, M. (2002). Researching mathematics education and language in multilingual South Africa. The Mathematics Educator, 12(2), 6-20.
277. Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefland, L., Cobb, P., & Mason, J. (1998). Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say? For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 41-51.
278. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In a search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 2-24.
279. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
280. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
281. Simon, J. (1998). Ngā Kura Māori: The native schools system 1867-1969. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
282. Skovsmose, O. (2005a). Foreground and politics of learning obstacles. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 4-10.
283. Skovsmose, O. (2005b). Meaning in mathematics education. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education. New York: Springer Science.
284. Smith, G. H. (1991). Tomorrow’s schools and the development of Māori education. Monograph no. 5. Auckland: University of Auckland, International Research Institute for Māori and Indigenous Education.
285. Smith, G. H. (1997). The development of Kaupapa Māori: Theory and Praxis. Auckland: Department of Education, The University of Auckland.
286. Smith, G. H. (2003a). Kaupapa Māori theory: Theorizing indigenous transformation of education and schooling. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of NZARE/AARE, December, 2003 (Kaupapa Māori Symposium), Auckland.
287. Smith, G. H. (2003b, October). Indigenous struggle for the transformation of education and schooling. Paper presented at the Alaskan Federation and Natives (AFN) Convention, 23 October, 2003, Anchorage, Alaska, US. Retrieved from http://www.kaupapamaori.com/assets//indigenous_struggle.pdf.
288. Smith, L. T., & Cram, F. (1997). An evaluation of the community panel diversion pilot programme. Commissioned report for the Crime Prevention Unit, Wellington.
289. Solomon, Y., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education, 12(3), 210-221.
290. Spanos, G., Rhodes, N. C., Dale, T. C., & Crandall, J. (1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving. In R. Cocking & J. P. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
291. Spolsky, B. (2003). Reassessing Māori regeneration. Language in Society, 32, 553-578.
292. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy: Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
293. Starks, D., & Barkhuizen, G. (2003). Students as fact gatherers in language-in-education planning. In R. Barnard & T. Glynn (Eds.), Bilingual children’s language and literacy development (pp. 247-273). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
294. Statistics New Zealand. (2002). 2001 Survey on the health of the Māori language. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/maori/2001-surveyon- the-health-of-the-maori-language.aspx.
295. Stewart, G. (2005). Māori in the science curriculum: Developments and possibilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(6), 851-870.
296. Stewart, G. (2007). Science in the Māori-medium curriculum: Assessment of policy outcomes in pūtaiao education. Philosophy of Education Society Conference, 6-9 December 2007, Wellington. Retrieved from www.pesa.org.au/papers/2010-papers/PESA%202010%20Paper% 2021.pdf.
297. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman Group Limited.
298. Sweiry, E., Crisp, V., Ahmed, A., & Pollitt, A. (2002, September). Tales of the unexpected: The influence of students’ expectations on exam validity. British Educational Research Association Conference, 11-14 September 2002, Exeter University. Retrieved from http:// www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/digitalAssets/113882_Tales_of_the_Expected._The_Influence:of_Students__Expectatio.pdf.
299. Tahana, N., Grant, K. T. O. K., Simmons, D. G., & Fairweather, J. R. (2000). Tourism and Māori development in Rotorua. Tourism and research education centre (TREC) technical report no.15. Christchurch: Lincoln University.
300. Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2000). Scaffolding for success: Reflective discourse and the effective teaching of mathematical thinking skills. In T. Rowland & C. Morgan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education: Papers of the British society for research into learning mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 19-32). London: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
301. Taratoa, W. (1858). He pukapuka whiha tēnei hei ako ma nga tangata (Māori arithmetic book for schools). Wellington: George Watene.
302. Te Maro, P., Averill, R., Higgins, J., & Tweed, B. (2009). Fostering the growth of teacher networks within professional development: Kaiako wharekura working in pāngarau. In Ministry of Education (Ed.), Poutama Tau evaluations 2008: Research Findings in Pāngarau for years 1-10 (pp. 34-46). Wellington: Learning Media.
303. Te Puni Kōkiri. (1993). The benefits of kura kaupapa Māori. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
304. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2001). Māori students learning Te Reo in mainstream secondary schools. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
305. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2004). Māori language in the community. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
306. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2006). Attitudes to the Māori language: Fact sheet 27. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri. Retrieved from http://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/in-print/our-publications/fact-sheets/attitudesmaorilang/.
307. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2008a). Te oranga o te reo Māori: The health of the Māori language in 2006. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
308. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2008b). Te oranga o te reo Māori i te rāngai pāpāho 2006: The health of the Māori language in the broadcasting sector 2006. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
309. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2007a). The Māori language survey fact sheet. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri. Retrieved from http://www.tpk.govt.nz/en/in-print/our-publications/fact-sheets/themaori- language-survey-factsheet/.
310. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2007b). Survey of the health of the Māori language in 2006. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
311. Te Puni Kōkiri. (2010). Te Reo Pāhu: Use of broadcasting and e-media, Māori language and culture. Wellington: Te Puni Kōkiri.
312. Te Ua, H. R. (n.d.). A brief history of Māori radio broadcasting. Retrieved from http://www. irirangi.net/roopu-tautoko/history/whakaaro-ake.aspx.
313. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
314. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Best evidence synthesis: Teacher professional development. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
315. Touval, A., & Westreich, G. (2003). Teaching sums of angle measures: A kinaesthetic approach. The Mathematics Teacher, 96(4), 230-233.
316. Trinick, T. (1994). Mathematical Māori discourse and the language of quantification. Unpublished Dip. Maths Ed. Investigation, The University of Auckland, Auckland.
317. Trinick, T. (1999). The relationships between Māori culture and Māori mathematical language. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
318. Trinick, T. (2005). Te Poutama Tau: A case study of two schools. In J. Higgins, K. C. Irwin, G. Thomas, T. Trinick, & J. Young-Loveridge (Eds.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development project 2004 (pp. 80-88). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
319. Trinick, T. (2006). Te Poutama Tau: A case study of two schools. In F. Ell, J. Higgins, K. C. Irwin, G. Thomas, T. Trinick, & J. Young-Loveridge (Eds.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development project 2004 (pp. 103-114). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
320. Trinick, T. (forthcoming). Te reo tātai (The Māori medium mathematics register) - challenges for students and teachers. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton.
321. Trinick, T., & Stevenson, B. (2007). Te Poutama Tau: Trends and patterns. In Ministry of Education (Eds.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects 2006 (pp. 44-53). Wellington: Learning Media.
322. Trinick, T., & Stevenson, B. (2008). Te Ara Poutama Tau: An evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2007. In Ministry of Education (Eds.), Te Poutama Tau evaluation report 2007. Research findings in Pāngarau for years 1-10 (pp. 2-11). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
323. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
324. Valero, P. (2002). Reform, democracy, and mathematics education. Ph.D. dissertation, The Danish University of Education, Copenhagen.
325. Valero, P. (2007). In between the global and the local: The politics of mathematics education reform in a globalized society. In B. Atweh, A. C. Barton, M. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel, & C. Vistro-Yu (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Verlag.
326. Valero, P. (2009). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergn, & F. Arzarello (Eds.) Proceedings of CERME 6, Lyon 28th January to 1st February, 2009 (pp. LV-LXXX). Available from http://www.inrp.fr/editions/editionselectroniques/cerme6/working-group-14.
327. Waitangi Tribunal. (1986). Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Te Reo Māori Claim (Wai 11). Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.
328. Waitangi Tribunal. (2010). Pre-publication Waitangi Tribunal report 262: Te Reo Māori. Wellington: Author.
329. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.
330. Wallace, M. L., & Ellerton, N. F. (2004). Language genre and school mathematics. Paper presented at the Topic Study Group 25 at International Congress of Mathematics Education-10, 4-11 July 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available from http://www.icme-organisers.dk/tsg25/distribution/wallace.pdf.
331. Walsh, M. (2005). Will indigenous languages survive? The Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 293-315.
332. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). Creating productive learning communities in the mathematics classroom: An international literature review. Pedagogies. An International Journal, 3, 133-149.
333. Wang, H., & Harkess, C. (2007). Senior secondary students’ achievement at Māori medium schools - 2004-2006 fact sheet. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
334. Watson, J. (2006). Statistical literacy in schools: Growth and goals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
335. Weiss, H. M., & Edwards, M. E. (1992). The family-school collaboration project: Systemic interventions for school improvement. In S. L. Christenson & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Home school collaboration: Enhancing children’s academic and social competence (pp. 215-243). Maryland: National Association of School Psychologists.
336. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
337. Wheelahan, L. (2007). Blending activity theory and critical realism to theorise the relationship between the individual and society and the implications for pedagogy. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 183-196.
338. White, D. Y. (2003). Promoting productive mathematical discourse with diverse students. Mathematical Behaviour, 22, 37-53.
339. White, P., Mitchelmore, M., Branca, N., & Maxon, M. (2004). Professional development: Mathematical content versus pedagogy. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 6, 49-60.
340. Wilkins, D. P. (2008). W(h)ither language, culture and education in remote Indigenous communities of the Northern Territory? Australian Review of Public Affairs. Retrieved from http://www. australianreview.net/digest/2008/10/wilkins.html.
341. Wilkinson, A., Barnsley, G. P., Hanna, P., & Swan, M. (1980). Assessing language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
342. Williams, S. R., & Baxter, J. A. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-orientated teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 21-38.
343. Winch, G., Johnston, R. R., March, P., Ljungdahl, L., & Holliday, M. (2004). Literacy: Reading, writing and children’s literature. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
344. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 89-100.
345. Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing? In H. Steinbring, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: NCTM.
346. Woods, P. (1992). Symbolic interactionism: Theory and method. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 337-404). London: Academic Press Ltd.
347. Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 9-25). Norwich: PME.
348. Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
349. Young-Loveridge, J. (2005). Seeing the mathematics of Maori boys in a new light: The benefits of diagnostic interviews. Paper presented at the NZARE National Conference, December, 2005, Dunedin, New Zealand.