Extending Technology Acceptance Model to the E-recruitment Context in Iran

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 121-129

  Kashi, Kia ^a   Zheng, Connie ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873512937     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12022     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitude toward the website on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1696-1708.
5. Anderson, N. (2003). Applicant and recruiter reactions to new technology in selection: A critical review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 121-136.
6. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
7. Bagozzi, R., Davis, F., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45, 660-686.
8. Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
9. Bondarouk, T., Ruel, H., & van der Heijden, B. (2009). E-HRM effectiveness in a public sector organization: A multi-stakeholder perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 578-590.
10. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.) New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
11. Cable, D. M., & Graham, M. E. (2000). The determinants of job-seekers' reputation perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 929-947.
12. Cappelli, P. (2001). Making the most of on-line recruiting. Harvard Business Review, 79, 139-146.
13. Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 90, 928-944.
14. Cober, R., Brown, D., Blumental, A., Doverspike, D., & Levy, P. (2000). The quest for the qualified job surfer: It's time the public sector catches the wave. Public Personnel Management, 29, 479-494.
15. Cober, R., Brown, D., Keeping, L., & Levy, P. (2004). Recruitment on the net: How do organizational website characteristics influence applicant attraction. Journal of Management, 30, 623-646.
16. Cober, R., Brown, D., Levy, P., Cober, A., & Keeping, L. (2003). Organizational websites: Website content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 158-169.
17. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.
18. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
19. De Goede, M. E., Van Vianen, A. E., & Klehe, U. (2011). Attracting applicants on the web: PO fit, industry culture stereotypes, and website design. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 51-61.
20. Ensher, E. A., Nielson, T. R., & Grant-Vallone, E. (2002). Tales from the hiring line: Effects of the internet and technology on the HR processes. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 224-244.
21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
22. Galanaki, E. (2002). The decision to recruit online: A descriptive study. Career Development International, 7, 243-251.
23. García-Izquierdo, A. L., Aguinis, H., & Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. (2010). Science-practice gap in e-recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 432-438.
24. Gatewood, R., Gowan, M., & Lautenschlager, G. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 414-427.
25. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 4, 1-79.
26. Hair, J. H., Jr, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., Sinar, E., & Lautenschlager, G. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986-1001.
28. Hooper, D. (2007). Getting better all the time. HR Monthly, May.
29. Hu, C., Su, H. C., & Chen, C. I. B. (2007). The effect of person-organization fit feedback via recruitment websites on applicant attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2509-2523.
30. Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 22, 35-48.
31. Kroustalis, C. M. (2009). Internet recruitment: Examining the roles of information, attitudes, and perceived fit on applicant attraction. Raleigh, NC: UMI Dissertation Publishing, Proquest.
32. Luxen, M. F., & Buunk, B. P. (2006). Human intelligence, fluctuating asymmetry and the peacock's tail: General intelligence as an honest signal of fitness. Personality & Individual Differences, 41, 897-902.
33. Lyons, B. D., & Marler, J. H. (2011). Got image: Examining organizational image in web recruitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 58-76.
34. Maurer, S., & Lui, Y. (2007). Developing effective e-recruiting websites: Insights for managers from marketers. Business Horizons, 50, 305-314.
35. Palmer, J. (2002). Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Information System Research, 13, 151-167.
36. Pfieffelmann, B., Wagner, S. H., & Libkuman, T. (2010). Recruiting on corporate web sites: Perceptions of fit and attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 40-47.
37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
38. Rynes, S. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post hiring consequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (2nd ed., vol. 2, pp. 399-444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
39. Rynes, S., & Miller, H. (1983). Recruiter and job influences on candidates for employment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 147-154.
40. Sanchez-Franco, M., & Roldan, J. (2005). Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users. Internet Research, 15, 21-48.
41. Scheu, C., Ryan, A. M., & Noa, F. (1999). Company web-sites as a recruiting mechanism: What influences applicants' impressions? 14th Annual Conference of Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Atlanta, Georgia.
42. Sinar, E. F., Paquet, S. L., & Reynolds, D. H. (2003). Nothing but net? Corporate image and web-based testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 150-157.
43. Straub, D. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13, 147-169.
44. Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2005). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 53-78.
45. Sylva, H., & Mol, S. (2009). E-recruitment: A study into applicant perceptions of an online application system. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 311-323.
46. Thompson, L., Braddy, P., & Wuensch, K. (2008). E-recruitment and the benefits of organizational web appeal. Computer in Human Behavior, 24, 2384-2398.
47. Tong, D. (2008). A study of e-recruitment technology adoption in Malaysia. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109, 281-300.
48. Tsai, W., & Yang, I. W. (2010). Does image matter to different job applicants? The influences of corporate image and applicant individual differences on organizational attractiveness. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 48-63.
49. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 239-260.
50. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Science, 39, 273-315.
51. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-481.
52. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 184-204.
53. Viswesvaran, C. (2003). Introduction to special issue: Role of technology in shaping the future of staffing and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 107-112.
54. Williamson, I., Lepak, D., & King, J. (2003). The effect of company recruitment website orientation on individuals' perceptions of organizational attractiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 242-263.
55. Zusman, R. R., & Landis, R. S. (2002). Applicant preferences for web based versus traditional job posting. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, 285-296.