Introduction to special issue: Role of technology in shaping the future of staffing and assessment

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 107-111

  Viswesvaran, Chockalingam ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042673989     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00233     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Boehm, V.R. (1977) Differential Prediction: A Methodological Artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 146-154.
2. Campbell, J.P. (1990) Modeling the performance prediction problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd edn. Vol. 1, 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
3. Dougherty, T.W., Turban, D.B. and Callender, J.C. (1994) Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 659-666.
4. Finger, M.S. and Ones, D.S. (1999) Psychometric equivalence of the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 11, 58-66.
5. Guion, R.M. (1998) Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Hough, L.M. and Ones, D.S. (2001) The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran (eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Personnel Psychology (165-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Hough, L.M. and Oswald, F.L. (2000) Personnel selection: Looking toward the future - Remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
8. Howard, A. (Ed.), (1996) The Changing Nature of Work. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Hunter, J.E. and Schmidt, F.L. (1977) A critical analysis of the statistical and ethical definitions of test fairness. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1053-1071.
10. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L. and Hunter, R. (1979) Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721-735.
11. Maxwell, S.E. and Arvey, R.D. (1993) The search for predictors with high validity and low adverse impact: Compatible or incompatible goals? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 433-437.
12. Mead, A.D. and Drasgow, F. (1993) Equivalence of computerized and paper and pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
13. Rynes, S.L. (1991) Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences. In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd edn. Vol 2). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14. Rynes, S.L. and Connerley, M. (1993) Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261-277.
15. Salgado, J.F. (1997) The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
16. Schmidt, F.L. (2002) The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-210.
17. Schmidt, F.L. and Kaplan, L.B. (1971) Composite versus multiple criteria: A review and resolution of the controversy. Personnel Psychology, 24, 419-434.
18. Schmidt, F.L. and Radar, M. (1999) Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: Meta-analytic findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 52, 445-464.
19. Schmitt, N. and Chan, D. (1998) Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Schneider, B. (1987) The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
21. Sinar, E.F. and Reynolds, D.H. (2001) Applicant reactions to internet-based selection techniques. In F.L. Oswald ((Chair) Computers = good? How test user and test taker perceptions affect technology based employment testing Symposium presented at the 16th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego: CA.
22. Vispoel, W.P. (1999) Creating computerized adaptive tests of music aptitude: Problems, solutions, and future directions. In F. Drasgow and J.B. Olson-Buchanan (eds), Innovations in computerized assessments (151-176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S. and Schmidt, F.L. (1996) Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
24. Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F.L. and Ones, D.S. (2002) The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: Unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 345-354.
25. Viswesvaran, C., Sinangil, H.K., Ones, D.S. and Anderson, N. (2001) Where we have been, where we are, (and where we could be). In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran (eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Personnel Psychology (1-9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.