A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 55-69

  Mena Serrano, Alexandra ^a   Kose, Carlos ^a   De Paula, Eloisa Andrade ^a   Tay, Lidia Yileng ^a   Reis, Alessandra ^a   Loguercio, Alessandro D ^a   Perdigão, Jorge ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF PONTA GROSSA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK SUPREME; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOYLOXYDECYL DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCOTCHBOND; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; YOUNG ADULT;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH WEAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873349914     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12005     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, et al. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 380-387.
2. Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, et al. Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1150-1156.
3. Spencer P, Swafford JR,. Unprotected protein at the dentin adhesive interface. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 501-507.
4. Wang Y, Spencer P,. Quantifying adhesive penetration in adhesive/dentin interface using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 59: 46-55.
5. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, et al. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 23-30.
6. Sano H,. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 11-14.
7. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, et al. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.
8. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1385-1391.
9. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH,. Effects of storage media on mechanical properties of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 104-108.
10. Hashimoto M,. A review-micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin-dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92: 268-280.
11. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1176-1184.
12. Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, et al. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1035-1042.
13. Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 135-140.
14. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, et al. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 339-344.
15. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA,. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1459-1467.
16. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 305-308.
17. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, et al. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 533-544.
18. Proença JP, Polido M, Osorio E, et al. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1542-1548.
19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, et al. Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 306-311.
20. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-881.
21. Perdigão J,. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 333-357.
22. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new "multi-mode" adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40: 475-484.
23. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC,. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 153-158.
24. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled studies of dental restoratives materials. Science committee project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restoration including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 121-147.
25. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation-clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 259-272.
26. Cvar JF, Ryge G, Schmalz G,. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2005; 9: 7-24.
27. Piva F, Coelho-Souza FH,. A deciduous teeth composite restoration clinical trial using two methods. J Dent Res 2009; 88 (Special issue A): abstract 3241. Available at: http://www.dentalresearch.org; http://iadr.confex. com/iadr/2009miami/webprogram/Paper120866.html (accessed August 6, 2012).
28. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 672-677.
29. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF,. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 323-332.
30. Swift JEJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, et al. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001; 29: 1-6.
31. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines: dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago, IL: American Dental Association; 2001, p. 12.
32. Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S,. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 253-258.
33. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA,. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 311-322.
34. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as class V filling materials. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 275-281.
35. Loguercio AD, Bittencourt DD, Baratieri LN, Reis A,. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 507-514.
36. Reis A, Loguercio AD,. A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 384-391.
37. Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni CH, et al. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 3-11.
38. Pocock SJ,. The size of a clinical trial. In:, Pocock SJ, editor. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1983, pp. 123-141.
39. Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, et al. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2005; 63: 173-178.
40. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 376-381.
41. Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, et al. Effect of fracture strength of primer-adhesive mixture on bonding effectiveness. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 413-420.
42. Sadek FT, Calheiros FC, Cardoso PE, et al. Early and 24-hour bond strength and degree of conversion of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 30-34.
43. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
44. Burrow MF, Kitasako Y, Thomas CD, Tagami J,. Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 456-460.
45. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, et al. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 459-466.
46. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y,. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006; 34: 97-105.
47. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD,. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1836-1841.
48. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissues interface. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 709-714.
49. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, et al. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyl-apatite. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 941-944.
50. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 757-761.
51. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 3573-3582.
52. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro P,. Evaluation of a new universal adhesive using different bonding strategies. J Dent Res 2012; 91 (Special issue A): abstract 18. Available at http://www.dentalresearch.org; http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2012tampa/webprogram/Paper156756.html (accessed August 6, 2012).
53. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 7-10.
54. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 74-78.
55. Material Safety Data Sheet, 3M ESPE, Scotchbond Universal. Available at http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=SSSSSuUn-zu8l00xMY- eN8mGov70k17zHvu9lxtD7SSSSSS (accessed June 15, 2012).
56. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, et al. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1851-1858.
57. Zander-Grande C, Ferreira SQ, Da Costa TR, et al. Application of etch-and-rinse adhesives on dry and rewet dentin under rubbing action: a 24-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 828-835.
58. Loguercio AD, Raffo J, Bassani F, et al. 24-month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 589-596.
59. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6449-6459.
60. Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de, Goes MF, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 973-980.
61. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al. Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-121.
62. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, et al. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent 2008; 36: 309-315.
63. Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, et al. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 877-885.
64. Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V,. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of class V restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 114-125.