Five-year Double-blind Randomized Clinical Evaluation of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and a Polyacid-modified Resin in Noncarious Cervical Lesions

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 323-332

  Loguercio, Alessandro D ^a   Reis, Alessandra ^a   Barbosa, Alcebíades N ^b   Roulet, Jean François ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b Luterana University of Brazil   (Brazil)

^c Ivoclar Vivadent   (Liechtenstein)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FILLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 1442275735     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997;28:255-258.
2. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in class V lesions. Am J Dent 1997;10:18-20.
3. Attin T, Buchalla W, Hellwig E. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:29-33.
4. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996;27: 203-209.
5. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC, Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1245-1253.
6. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 2001;26:12-16.
7. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Clin Dent 1996;7: 81-84.
8. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000;25:382-387.
9. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials-3-year results. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5:31-39.
10. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:153-156.
11. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12: 161-166.
12. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Van-Herle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
13. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence int 1999;30: 607-614.
14. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical class V lesions. Dent Mater 1998;14:294-306.
15. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:41-47.
16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
17. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207.
18. Loguercio AD, Barbosa AN, Busato ALS, Barros A. Avaliação clínica de um ionômero de vidro modificado por resina e de uma resina poliácido modificada em lesões cervicais: Acompanhamento de 03 anos. J Bras Odonto Clin 1999;3:7-29.
19. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical "abrasion" lesions: One-year results. Quintessence Int 1995;26: 739-743.
20. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996;27:373-382.
21. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD [Letters to the Editor]. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-589.
22. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999;24:115-124.
23. Mount GJ. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: Review of a successfull technique. Quintessence Int 1997;28: 643-650.
24. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:7-13.
25. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials: A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.
26. Small IC, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK. Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 1998;19:545-550.
27. Swift Jr EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder Jr AD, Bayne SC, May Jr KN, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29:1-6.
28. Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996;21:53-58.
29. Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Oper Dent 2000;25:152-154.
30. Van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16: 285-291.
31. Van Meebeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-1702.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Nakayama Y. Mechanism of bonding of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin [abstract 2236]. J Dent Res 1998;77:911.
33. Yap AUJ. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: a comparison of water sorption characteristics. Biomaterials 1996; 17:1897-1990.
34. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-714.
35. Yoshiyama M, Masada J, Uchida A, Ishida H. Scanning electron microscopic characterization of sensitive vs. insensitive human radicular dentin. J Dent Res 1989;68:1498-1502.