Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the "Mode 3" Knowledge Production System

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 327-372

  Carayannis, Elias G ^a   Campbell, David F J ^b,c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED ARTS VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Academic firm; Art and arts universities; Conceptual branding; Democracy of knowledge; Disjointed incrementalism; Entrepreneurial university; Fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem; GloCal; Innovation networks; Knowledge clusters; Knowledge democracy; Knowledge fractals; Knowledge nuggets; Knowledge swings; Knowledge weavers; Mode 3 knowledge production system; Mode 3 university; Multidimensional and multi attribute knowledge and innovation systems; Open innovation diplomacy; Partisan mutual adjustment; Quadruple helix innovation; Quintuple helix innovation; Strategic incrementalism; Strategic management of technological learning; Technological learning dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873253251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18687873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Anbari FT, Umpleby SA (2006) Productive research teams and knowledge generation. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 26-38.
2. Barth TD (2010) Konzeption, Messung und Rating der Demokratiequalität. Brasilien, Südarfika, Australien und die Russische Föderation 1997-2006. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken.
3. Biegelbauer P (ed) (2010) Steuerung von Wissenschaft? Die Governance des österreichischen Innovationssystems. Studienverlag, Innsbruck.
4. Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1997) Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York.
5. Bush V (1945) Science: the endless frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington. http://www. nsf. gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945. htm#transmittal.
6. von Braun CF (1997) The innovation war. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
7. Caduff C, Siegenthaler F, Wälchli T (2010) Art and artistic research. Zurich Yearbook of the Arts. Zurich University of the Arts, Zurich.
8. Campbell DFJ (1992) Die Dynamik der politischen Links-Rechts-Schwingungen in Österreich: Die Ergebnisse einer Expertenbefragung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 21(2): 165-179.
9. Campbell DFJ (1994) European nation-state under pressure: national fragmentation or the evolution of suprastate structures? Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 25(6): 879-909.
10. Campbell DFJ (1999) Evaluation universitärer Forschung. Entwicklungstrends und neue Strategiemuster für wissenschaftsbasierte Gesellschaften. SWS-Rundschau 39(4): 363-383.
11. Campbell DFJ (2000) Forschungspolitische Trends in wissenschaftsbasierten Gesellschaften. Strategiemuster für entwickelte Wirtschaftssysteme. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 47(2): 130-143.
12. Campbell DFJ (2001) Politische Steuerung über öffentliche Förderung universitärer Forschung? Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 30(4): 425-438. http://www. oezp. at/pdfs/2001-4-04. pdf.
13. Campbell DFJ (2003) The evaluation of university research in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Germany and Austria. In: Shapira P, Kuhlmann S (eds) Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar, Camberley, pp 98-131.
14. Campbell DFJ (2005) Demokratie, Demokratiequalität und Grundrechte: Ein Vergleich der Fiedler- und EU-Verfassung. Unpublished Manuscript, Vienna.
15. Campbell DFJ (2006) The university/business research networks in science and technology: knowledge production trends in the United States, European Union and Japan. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 67-100.
16. Campbell DFJ (2006b) Nationale Forschungssysteme im Vergleich. Strukturen, Herausforderungen und Entwicklungsoptionen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 35(1): 25-44. http://www. oezp. at/oezp/online/online. htm.
17. Campbell DFJ (2008) The basic concept for the democracy ranking of the quality of democracy. Democracy Ranking, Vienna. http://www. democracyranking. org/downloads/basic_concept_democracy_ranking_2008_A4. pdf.
18. Campbell DFJ (2010) Key findings (summary abstract) of the Democracy Ranking 2010 and the Democracy Improvement Ranking 2010. Democracy Ranking, Vienna. http://www. democracyranking. org/downloads/Key%20findings%20of%20the%20Democracy%20Ranking%202010_A4. pdf.
19. Campbell DFJ (2011) Wissenschaftliche "Parallelkarrieren"als Chance. Wenn Wissenschaft immer öfter zur Halbtagsbeschäftigung wird, könnte eine Lösung im "Cross-Employment"liegen. Guest Commentary for DIE PRESSE (February 2, 2011). http://diepresse. com/home/bildung/meinung/635781/Wissenschaftliche-Parallelkarrieren-als-Chance?direct=635777&_vl_backlink=/home/bildung/index. do& selChannel=500.
20. Campbell DFJ, Schaller C (eds) (2002) Demokratiequalität in Österreich. Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. http://www. ssoar. info/ssoar/View/?resid=12473.
21. Campbell DFJ, Güttel WH (2005) Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the "scientification" of business R& D. Int J Technol Manag 31(1/2): 152-175.
22. Campbell DFJ, Barth TD (2009) Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich [How can democracy and the quality of democracy be measured? Models, democracy indices and country-based case studies in global comparison]. SWS-Rundschau 49(2): 209-233. http://www. ssoar. info/ssoar/View/?resid=12471.
23. Carayannis EG (1993) Incrementalisme Strategique. Le Progrès Technique (no. 2). Paris, France.
24. Carayannis EG (1994). Gestion Strategique de l'Apprentissage Technologique. Le Progrès Technique (no. 2). Paris, France.
25. Carayannis EG (1999) Knowledge transfer through technological hyperlearning in five industries. International Journal of Technovation 19(3, March): 141-161.
26. Carayannis EG (2000) Investigation and validation of technological learning versus market performance. International Journal of Technovation 20(7, July): 389-400.
27. Carayannis EG (2001) The strategic management of technological learning. CRC, Boca Raton.
28. Carayannis EG (2004) Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. Int J Nucl Knowl Manag 1: 49-67.
29. Carayannis EG, Alexander J (1999) Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-industry (GUI) partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. J Technol Transf 24(2/3, August): 197-210.
30. Carayannis EG, Alexander J (1999) Technology-driven strategic alliances: tools for learning and knowledge exchange in a positive-sum world. In: Dorf RC (ed) The technology management handbook. CRC, Boca Raton (1-32 until 1-41).
31. Carayannis EG, Gonzalez E (2003) Creativity and innovation = competitiveness? When, how, and why, vol. 1, chapter 8. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 587-606.
32. Carayannis EG, Gonzalez E, Wetter J (2003) The nature and dynamics of discontinuous and disruptive innovations from a learning and knowledge management perspective, vol. 1, chapter 4. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 115-138.
33. Carayannis EG, Alexander J (2004) Strategy, structure and performance issues of pre-competitive R& D consortia: insights and lessons learned. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(2).
34. Carayannis EG, Laget P (2004) Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: public-private, EU-US R& D partnerships. R& D Management 34(1): 17-31.
35. Carayannis EG, von Zedtwitz M (2005) Architecting gloCal (global-local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies. Technovation 25: 95-110.
36. Carayannis EG, Alexander JM (2006) Global and local knowledge. Glocal transatlantic public-private partnerships for research and technological development. Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills.
37. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) "Mode 3": meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspective. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 1-25.
38. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) Conclusion: key insights and lessons learned for policy and practice. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 331-341.
39. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) Introduction and chapter summaries. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp ix-xxvi.
40. Carayannis EG, Sipp C (2006) E-development toward the knowledge economy: leveraging technology, innovation and entrepreneurship for "smart development". Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills.
41. Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (eds) (2007) Rediscovering Schumpeter. Creative destruction evolving into "mode 3". Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills.
42. Carayannis EG, Spillan JE, Ziemnowicz C (2007) Introduction: why Joseph Schumpeter's creative destruction? Everything has changed. In: Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (eds) Rediscovering Schumpeter. Creative destruction evolving into "mode 3". Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills, pp 1-5.
43. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2009) "Mode 3" and "quadruple helix": toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46(3/4): 201-234. http://www. inderscience. com/browse/index. php?journalID=27& year=2009& vol=46& issue=3/4.
44. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2010) Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A Proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1(1): 41-69. http://www. igi-global. com/bookstore/article. aspx?titleid=41959.
45. Carayannis, Elias G (2012). The knowledge of culture and the culture of knowledge. Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills (in press).
46. Cardullo MW (1999) Technology life cycles. In: Dorf RC (ed) The technology management handbook. CRC, Boca Raton (3-44 until 3-49).
47. Colapinto C, Porlezza C (2012) Innovation in creative industries: from the quadruple helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) (in press). http://www. springerlink. com/content/rx725r81u9l199g5/.
48. Cesaroni F, Gambardella A, Garcia-Fontes W, Mariani M (2004) The chemical sectoral system: firms, markets, institutions and the processes of knowledge creation and diffusion. In: Malerba F (ed) Sectoral systems of innovation. Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 121-154.
49. Danilda I, Lindberg M, Torstensson B-M (2009) Women Resource Centres. A quattro helix innovation system on the European Agenda. Paper. http://www. hss09. se/own_documents/Papers/3-11%20-%20Danilda%20Lindberg%20&%20Torstensson%20-%20paper. pdf.
50. De Geus A (1988) Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review 66: 2, 70 (Winter).
51. Drucker P (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship. Penguin Press, New York.
52. Dubina IN, Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2012) Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) (in press). http://www. springerlink. com/content/t5j8l12136h526h5/.
53. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29: 109-123.
54. Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as "quasi-firms": the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32: 109-121.
55. Ferlie E, Musselin C, Andresani G (2008) The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education 56(3): 325-348. http://www. springerlink. com/content/n22v78885l377144/fulltext. pdf.
56. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (eds) (2007) Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
57. Florida R (2004) The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. Basic Books, Cambridge.
58. Gerybadze A, Reger G (1999) Globalization of R& D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy 28: 251-274.
59. Geuna A, Martin BR (2003) University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva 41: 277-304.
60. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London.
61. Gleick J (1987) Chaos: making a new science. Viking, New York.
62. Godoe H (2007) Doing innovative research: "mode 3" and methodological challenges in leveraging the best of three worlds. In: Carayannis EG, Ziemnowicz C (eds) Rediscovering Schumpeter. Creative destruction evolving into "mode 3". Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills, pp 344-361.
63. Hall PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain Comparative Politics 25: 257-296.
64. Hemlin S, Allwood CM, Martin BR (2004) Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
65. Hooghe L, Marks G (2001) Multi-level governance and european integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
66. Kaiser R, Prange H (2004) The reconfiguration of national innovation systems-the example of German biotechnology. Research Policy 33: 395-408.
67. Killman R (1985) Gaining control of the corporate culture. McGraw-Hill, New York.
68. Kline SJ, Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenburg N (eds) The positive sum strategy. National Academy Press, Washington.
69. Kuhlmann S (2001) Future governance of innovation policy in Europe-three scenarios. Research Policy 30: 953-976.
70. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
71. Krücken G (2003) Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the "third academic mission" at German universities. Int J Technol Manag 25(1/2): 18-33.
72. Krücken G (2003) Learning the "new, new thing": on the role of path dependency in university structures. High Educ 46(3): 315-339.
73. Krücken G, Meier F, Müller A (2007) Information, cooperation, and the blurring of boundaries-technology transfer in German and American discourses. High Educ 53(6): 675-696.
74. Leydesdorff L (2012) The triple helix, quadruple helix, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) (in press). http://www. springerlink. com/content/x543613918677871/.
75. Lindberg M, Danilda I, Torstensson B-M (2012) Women Resource Centres-a creative knowledge environment of quadruple helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) (forthcoming). http://www. springerlink. com/content/t47q129240051g31/.
76. Lindblom CE (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19: 79-88.
77. Lindblom CE (1965) The intelligence of democracy. The Free Press, New York.
78. Lindblom CE, Cohen DK (1979) Usable knowledge: social science and social problem solving. Yale University Press, New Haven.
79. Lundvall B-Å (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
80. Malerba F (ed) (2004) Sectoral systems of innovation. Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
81. McKelvey M, Orsenigo L, Pammolli F (2004) Pharmaceuticals analyzed through the lens of a sectoral innovation system. In: Malerba F (ed) Sectoral systems of innovation. Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73-120.
82. McNiff S (1998) Art-based research. Jessica Kingsley, London.
83. McNiff S (2008) Art-based research. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 29-40.
84. Milbergs E (2005) Innovation ecosystems and prosperity. Center for Accelerating Innovation. http://www. innovationecosystems. com.
85. Miyata Y (2003) An analysis of research and innovative activities of universities in the United States. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 715-738.
86. Müller WC, Strøm K (2000) Conclusion: coalition governance in Western Europe. In: Strøm K (ed) WC Müller. Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 559-592.
87. National Science Board (2010) Science and engineering indicators 2010. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/seind10/pdfstart. htm.
88. Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
89. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) Dynamics of technological change. Columbia University Press, New York.
90. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge.
91. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2003) Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41: 179-194.
92. O'Donnell G (2004) Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy. In: O'Donnell G, Cullell JV, Iazzetta OM (eds) The quality of democracy. Theory and applications. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp 9-92.
93. OECD (1994) Frascati manual. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. OECD, Paris.
94. OECD (1998) Science, technology and industry outlook. OECD, Paris.
95. OECD (2002) Frascati manual 2002. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. OECD, Paris. http://www. oecdbookshop. org/oecd/display. asp?CID=& LANG=EN& SF1=DI& ST1=5LMQCR2K61JJ.
96. OECD (2006) Research and development statistics. OECD, Paris (Online database).
97. Pfeffer T (2006) Virtualization of research universities. Raising the right questions to address key functions of the institution. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 307-330.
98. Plasser F (ed) (2004) Politische kommunikation in Österreich. Ein praxisnahes Handbuch. WUV-Universitätsverlag, Vienna.
99. Plasser F, Plasser G (2002) Global political campaigning. A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practices. Praeger, Westport.
100. Polanyi M (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54-74. http://sciencepolicy. colorado. edu/students/envs_5100/polanyi_1967. pdf and http://fiesta. bren. ucsb. edu/~gsd/595e/docs/41.%20Polanyi_Republic_of_Science. pdf.
101. Resetarits R, Resetarits-Tincul A-M (2012) Fuzzy concepts-a new approach in the description of boundaries as creative knowledge environments in educational sciences. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1) (in press). http://www. springerlink. com/content/j463335233513170/.
102. Rycroft RW, Kash DE (1999) The complexity challenge. Technological innovation for the 21st century. Pinter, London.
103. Ritterman J, Bast G, Mittelstraß J (eds) (2011) Art and research. Can artists be researchers? Springer, Vienna.
104. Saward M (ed) (2006) Democratic innovation: deliberation, representation and association. Routledge, London.
105. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York.
106. Shapira P, Kuhlmann S (eds) (2003) Learning from science and technology policy evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
107. Shavinina LV (2003) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Amsterdam.
108. Steinmueller WE (2004) The European software sectoral system of innovation. In: Malerba F (ed) Sectoral systems of innovation. Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 193-242.
109. Tassey G (2001) R& D Policy Models and Data Needs. In: Feldman MP, Link AN (eds) Innovation policy in the knowledge-based economy. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 37-71.
110. Umpleby SA (1997) Cybernetics of conceptual systems. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 28: 635-652.
111. Umpleby SA (2002) Should knowledge of management be organized as theories or as methods? In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems 2002. Proceedings of the 16th European meeting on cybernetics and systems research, vol 1. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, pp 492-497.
112. Umpleby SA (2005) What I learned from Heinz von Foerster about the construction of science. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 278-294.
113. Volkens A, Klingemann H-D (2002) Parties, ideologies, and issues. Stability and change in fifteen European party systems 1945-1998. In: Luther KR, Müller-Rommel F (eds) Political parties in the New Europe. Political and analytical challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 143-167.
114. Von Hippel E (1995) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
115. Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge.
116. Von Zedtwitz M, Gassmann O (2002) Market versus technology drive in R& D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy 31(4): 569-588.
117. Von Zedtwitz M, Heimann P (2006) Innovation in clusters and the liability of foreignness of international R& D. In: Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (eds) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, Westport, pp 101-122.
118. Yau LFC (2012) The arts in a knowledge economy: creation of other knowledges. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3 (1) (in press). http://www. springerlink. com/content/n38t14j275250376/.