An Analysis of Research and Innovative Activities of Universities in the United States

The International Handbook on Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 715-738

  Miyata, Yukio ^a  

^a Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

Author keywords

Innovation; Innovative activities; Research; Technological change; United States; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849100416     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50049-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. AUTM licensing survey: FY 1996 1997, Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), AUTM Inc., Norwalk, Connecticut.
2. AUTM licensing survey: FY 1997 1998, Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), AUTM Inc., Norwalk, Connecticut.
3. AUTM licensing survey: FY 1998 1999, Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), AUTM Inc., Norwalk, Connecticut.
4. AUTM licensing survey: FY 1999 2000, Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), AUTM Inc., Norwalk, Connecticut.
5. Audretcsh D.B., Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 1996, 86(3):630-640.
6. Behrens T.R., Gray D.O. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy 2001, 30:179-199.
7. Blumenstyk G. Conflict-of-interest fears rise as university chase industry support. The Chronicle of Higher Education 1998, (May 22).
8. Blumenthal D., Campbell E.G., Causino N., Louis K.S. Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences-an industry survey. New England Journal of Medicine 1996, 334(6):368-373.
9. Blumenthal D., Cambell E.G., Anderson M.S., Causino N., Louis K.S. Withholding research results in academic life science. The Journal of the American Medical Association 1997, 277:1224-1228.
10. Burtless G., Noll R.G. Students and research universities. Challenges to Research Universities 1998, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. R.G. Noll (Ed.).
11. Campbell P.W. Pacts between universities and companies worry federal officials. The Chronicle of Higher Education 1998, (May 15).
12. Cho M.K., Shohara R., Schissel A. Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at U.S. universities. Journal of American Medical Association 2000, 284(17):2203-2208.
13. Cohen W.M., Florida R., Goe W.R. University-industry research centers in the United States 1994, Center for Economic Development, John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Cohen W.M., Florida R., Randazzese L., Walsh J. Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. Challenges to Research Universities 1998, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. R.G. Noll (Ed.).
15. Etzkowitz H. Bridging the gap: The evolution of industry-university links in the United States. Industrializing Knowledge 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L.M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, R. Florida (Eds.).
16. Feldman M.P. The geography of innovation 1994, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
17. Government-University-Industry-Research Roundtable Overcoming barriers to collaborative research 1998, http://www.nap.edu/html.
18. Kline S.J., Rosenberg N. An overview of innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy 1986, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. R. Landau, N. Rosenberg (Eds.).
19. Krimsky S., Rothenberg L.S., Stott P., Kyle G. Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: A pilot study of 14 publications. Science and Engineering Ethics 1996, 2:395-410.
20. Lee Y.S. The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer 2000, 25:111-133.
21. Lugar M.I., Goldstein H.A. Technology in the garden 1991, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
22. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy 1998, 26:773-776.
23. McKelvey M. Evolutionary innovations 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A. The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. university research and technology transfer. Industrializing Knowledge 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L.M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, R. Florida (Eds.).
25. Mowery D.C., Rosenberg N. Technology and the pursuit of economic growth 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Nelsen L. Remarks at secrecy in science: Exploring university, industry, and government relationships 1999, (March 29, 1999). At Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Noll R.G. The future of research universities. Challenges to Research Universities 1998, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. R.G. Noll (Ed.).
28. Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research with their own money?. Research Policy 1990, 19:165-174.
29. Rosenberg N., Nelson R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 1994, 23:323-348.
30. Schumpeter J.A. The theory of economic development 1934, (English ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Shapley D., Roy R. Lost at the frontier 1985, ISI Press, Philadelphia.
32. Siegel D., Waldman D., Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Working Paper 7256. 1999, National Bureau of Economic Research.
33. Sommer J.W. Introduction. The Academy in Crisis 1995, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick. J.W. Sommer (Ed.).
34. U.S.Congress Committee Report Unlocking our future; Toward a new national science policy 1998, House Committee on Science (September 24, 1998). http://www.house.gov/science:policy_report.htm.
35. U.S.Congress Committee Report American leadership in the innovation economy 1999, Staff of Connie Meck, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress. http://www.senate.gov/~jec/summitreport.htm.
36. U.S.Congressional Hearing Access by foreign companies to U.S. universities 1993, Subcommittee on Science, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, 103rd Congress, First Session, October 28., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
37. USGAO (General Accounting Office) University research: Controlling inappropriate access to federally funded research results 1992, GAO/RCED-92-104, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia.
38. USGAO (General Accounting Office) Technology transfer: Administration of the Bayh-Dole Act by research universities 1998, GAO/RCED-98-126. http://www.gao.gov.
39. USNSF (National Science Foundation) Science and engineering indicators, 2000 2000, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
40. USNSF (National Science Foundation) Science and engineering indicators, 2002 2002, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
41. USOTA (Office of Technology Assessment) Technology, innovation, and regional development: Encouraging high-technology development, background paper #2 1984, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
42. USPTO (Patent and Trademark Office) U.S. colleges and universities: Utility patent grants, 1969-1999 2000, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C.
43. Varga A. University research and regional innovation 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
44. Campus, Inc.: Corporate power in the Ivory Tower 2000, Tower Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York. G.D. White (Ed.).
45. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Armstrong J. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry 1998, XXXVI:65-86. (January).