Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gynecologic and Urologic Oncology: An Evidence-Based Analysis

Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Volumn 10, Issue 27, 2010, Pages 1-118

 

^a ONTARIO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG TERM CARE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873093207     PISSN: 19157398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Advincula AP, Wang K. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16(3):291-301.
2. Canadian Cancer Society's Steering Committee. Canadian cancer statistics 2009 [Internet]. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Cancer Society. 2009 [cited: 2010 Mar 31]. 124 p. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/cxhqgm
3. Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111(2 Pt 1):436-47.
4. Canadian Cancer Society. Causes of uterine cancer [Internet]. [updated 2009 Dec 10; cited 2010 Mar 31]. Available from: http://www.cancer.ca/Canada-wide/About%20cancer/Types%20of%20cancer/Causes%20of%20uterine%20cancer.aspx?sc_lang=en
5. Public Health Agency of Canada. Cervical cancer facts and figures [Internet]. [updated 2009 Feb 3; cited 2010 Apr 27]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/cancer/cervical_cancer_figures-cancer_du_col_uterus-eng.php
6. Health Canada. Screening for cervical cancer [Internet]. [updated 2006 Dec 6; cited 2010 Mar 31]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/iyh-vsv/diseases-maladies/cervical-uterus-eng.php
7. National Cancer Institute. Endometrial cancer treatment: general information about endometrial cancer [Internet]. [updated 2010 Nov 5; cited 2010 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/endometrial/Patient
8. Humphrey MM, Apte SM. The use of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Cancer Control 2009; 16(1):30-7.
9. National Cancer Institute. Endometrial cancer treatment: treatment option overview [Internet]. [updated 2010 Nov 5; cited 2010 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/endometrial/Patient/page4
10. National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer treatment: general information about cervical cancer [Internet]. [updated 2010 Apr 6; cited 2010 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/cervical/Patient
11. National Cancer Institute. Cervical cancer treatment: treatment option overview [Internet]. [updated 2010 Apr 6; cited 2010 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/cervical/Patient/page4
12. Medline Plus. Medical dictionary [Internet]. [updated 2010 May 6; cited 2010 May 6]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002915.htm
13. Bandera CA, Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21(1):25-30. Page 109
14. Laberge PY, Singh SS. Surgical approach to hysterectomy: introducing the concept of technicity J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31(11):1050-3.
15. Lefebvre G. Doing what's best. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31(5):397-400.
16. Elit, L., Kwon, J. S., Schultz, S. E., Przybysz, R., Wilton, A. S., Simunovic, M., and Urbach, D. R. Surgery for uterine cancer [Internet]. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. 2008 [cited: 2010 Apr 26]. 146 p. Available from: http://www.ices.on.ca/file/Cancer%20Surgery%20in%20Ontario,%20Chapter%206,%20Surgery%20for%20Uterine%20Cancer.pdf
17. Elit, L., Kwon, J. S., Schultz, S. E., Przybysz, R., Wilton, A. S., Simunovic, M., and Urbach, D. R. Surgery for cervical cancer [Internet]. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. 2008 [cited: 2010 Apr 26]. 188 p. Available from: http://www.ices.on.ca/file/Cancer%20Surgery%20in%20Ontario,%20Chapter%208,%20Surgery%20for%20Cervical%20Cancer.pdf
18. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009; 55(5):1037-63.
19. Public Health Agency of Canada. Prostate cancer [Internet]. [updated 2010 Mar 4; cited 2010 May 3]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/cancer/prostate_cancer-cancer_prostate-eng.php
20. Nickel JC, Herschorn S, Corcos J, Donnelly B, Drover D, Elhilali M et al. Canadian guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol 2005; 12(3):2677-83.
21. National Cancer Institute. Prostate cancer treatment: general information about prostate cancer [Internet]. [updated 2010 Nov 5; cited 2010 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/prostate/Patient
22. National Cancer Institute. Prostate cancer treatment: treatment option overview [Internet]. [updated 2010 Nov 5; cited 2010 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/prostate/Patient/page4
23. Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM, Su LM. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach. Surg Oncol 2009; 18(3):233-41.
24. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health indicators [Internet]. Ottawa, Ontario: CIHI. 2009 [cited: 2010 Apr 9]. 133 p. Available from: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/Healthindicators2009_en.pdf
25. Finelli, A., Sharir, S., Gunraj, N., and Simunovic, M. Surgery for prostate cancer [Internet]. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. 2008 [cited: 2010 Aug 9]. 52 p. Available from: http://www.ices.on.ca/file/Cancer%20Surgery%20in%20Ontario,%20Chapter%203,%20Surgery%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer.pdf
26. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs - the case of robotic-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(8):701-4.
27. Mettler L, Schollmeyer T, Boggess J, Magrina JF, Oleszczuk A. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 2008; 20(5):581-9.
28. Sharma NL, Shah NC, Neal DE. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Br J Cancer 2009; 101(9):1491-6.
29. Lin PS, Wakabayashi MT, Han ES. Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2009; 10(1-2):33-43.
30. Boggess JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg 2007; 1:31-7.
31. Mendivil A, Holloway RW, Boggess JF. Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114(2:Suppl):Suppl-31.
32. Cho JE, Liu C, Gossner G, Nezhat FR. Laparoscopy and gynecologic oncology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52(3):313-26.
33. Schaeffer EM, Loeb S, Walsh PC. The case for open radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2010; 37(1):49-55.
34. Borden LS, Jr., Kozlowski PM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an objective assessment and review of the literature. ScientificWorldJournal 2006; 6:2589-061.
35. Visco AG, Advincula AP. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(6):1369-84.
36. Brandina R, Berger A, Kamoi K, Gill IS. Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19(3):290-6.
37. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328(7454):1490.
38. Camberlin, C., Senn, A., Leys, M., and De Laet, C. Robot-assisted surgery: health technology assessment health services research [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre. 2009 [cited: 2010 Mar 31]. 135 p. Report No. 104C. Available from: http://www.kce.fgov.be/Download.aspx?ID=1462
39. Tooher, R. The da Vinci surgical robotics system: technology overview [Internet}. Adelaide, South Australia: ASERNIP-S. 2004 Jul 1 [cited: 2010 Mar 31]. 117 p. Report No. 45. Available from: http://www.surgeons.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=ASERNIP_S_Publications&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFileID=1887
40. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Computer-assisted surgery using telemanipulators: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser [Internet].2004 February [cited 2010 05 03] 4(1) 1-37. Available from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_teleman_020104.pdf. [cited 2010 Mar 31].
41. Llanos, Mendez A. and Villegas, Portero R. Robot-assisted surgery using da Vinci robot telemanipulation in prostatectomy. Sevilla: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. 2007 51 p.
42. Cho JE, Nezhat FR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16(6):669-81.
43. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(3):412-7.
44. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(3):407-11.
45. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(4):360-9.
46. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA, III. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198(6):679.
47. Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(1):41-5.
48. Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2008; 12(3):227-37.
49. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(4):357.
50. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(3):425-30.
51. Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007; 3(3):224-8.
52. Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Walz J, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Gurriet B et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2008; 22(12):2743-7.
53. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109(1):86-91.
54. Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15(6):673-6.
55. Smith AL, Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review. Minerva Ginecol 2009; 61(4):339-46.
56. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113(3):357-61.
57. Cho JE, Shamshirsaz AH, Nezhat C, Nezhat C, Nezhat F. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Minerva Ginecol 2010; 62(2):137-67.
58. Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15(5):584-8.
59. U.S.National Institutes of Health. Laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer [Internet]. [updated 2010 Feb 23; cited 2010 May 7]. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00614211?term=laparoscopic+robotic+radical+hysterectomy&rank=1
60. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117(2):260-5.
61. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117(2):224-8.
62. Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Khurshid N, Phibbs G, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010; 20(3):438-42.
63. Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim JW et al. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101(2):116-21.
64. Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A, Singh DK, Buttin BM, Lurain JR et al. The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5(4):392-7.
65. Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Peiretti M, Sanguineti F, Bocciolone L et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115(1):60-4.
66. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113(1):36-41.
67. bu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, Soslow RA, Hensley ML, Leitao MM, Jr. et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115(2):236-8.
68. Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery: SJS 2009; 98(2):76-88.
69. El-Hakim A, Tewari A. Robotic prostatectomy - a review. MedGenMed 2004; 6(4):20.
70. Berryhill J, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008; 72(1):15-23.
71. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 2009; 104(10):1428-35.
72. Tooher R, Swindle P, Woo H, Miller J, Maddern G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of comparative studies. J Urol 2006; 175(6):2011-7.
73. Tooher, R., Swindle, P., Woo, H., Miller, J., and Maddern, G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an accelerated systematic review. South Australia: Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical. 2005 118 p. Available from: http://www.surgeons.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=ASERNIP_S_Publications&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFileID=2681
74. Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72(2):412-6.
75. Rocco B, Matei D-V, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: A matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2009; 104(7):991-5.
76. Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN, Hou SS, To KF, Yip SK. Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16(1):31-5.
77. D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN et al. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21(5):322-8.
78. Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misrai V, Haertig A et al. Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2009; 27(5):599-605.
79. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104(4):534-9.
80. Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R. Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 2009; 73(1):119-23.
81. Ou Y-C, Yang C-R, Wang J, Cheng C-L, Patel VR. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. Anticancer Res 2009; 29(5):1637-42.
82. Zorn KC, Katz MH, Bernstein A, Shikanov SA, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology 2009; 74(2):296-302.
83. Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK, Saur R, Wolf JS, Jr. et al. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 70(5):945-9.
84. Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RH. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care 1998; 36(7):1002-12.
85. Ball AJ, Gambill B, Fabrizio MD, Davis JW, Given RW, Lynch DF et al. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution. J Endourol 2006; 20(10):723-31.
86. Hohwu L, Akre O, Pedersen KV, Jonsson M, Nielsen CV, Gustafsson O. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009; 43(4):259-64.
87. Ploussard G, Xylinas E, Paul A, Gillion N, Salomon L, Allory Y et al. Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 2009; 23(6):939-43.
88. Srinualnad S. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91(3):377-82.
89. Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 2010; 75(5):1092-7.
90. Polcari AJ, Hugen CM, Sivarajan G, Woods ME, Paner GP, Flanigan RC et al. Comparison of open and robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. J Endourol 2009; 23(8):1313-7.
91. Yates J, Haleblian G, Stein B, Miller B, Renzulli J, Pareek G. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience. Can J Urol 2009; 16(5):4842-6.
92. Laurila TA, Huang W, Jarrard DF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol Oncol 2009; 27(5):529-33.
93. Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Can J Urol 2008; 15(2):3994-9.
94. White MA, De Haan AP, Stephens DD, Maatman TK, Maatman TJ. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology 2009; 73(3):567-71.
95. Weizer AZ, Strope S, Wood DP, Jr. Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes? Urol Oncol 2010; 28(2):210-4.
96. O'Malley PJ, Van AS, Bouchier-Hayes DM, Crowe H, Costello AJ. Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience. World J Urol 2006; 24(2):165-70.
97. Singh I, Hemal AK. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010; 10(5):671-82.
98. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 2007; 178(2):478-82.
99. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Ramin SA, Lau C et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175(2):541-6.
100. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60(5):864-8.
101. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168(3):945-9.
102. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA, Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67(2):360-3.
103. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103(4):448-53.
104. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int 2005; 96(1):39-42.
105. Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Anderson LW et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J Urol 2005; 174(3):912-4.
106. Smith JA, Jr., Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178(6):2385-9.
107. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63(5):819-22.
108. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101(9):1145-9.
109. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92(3):205-10.
110. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):205-13.
111. Bernardini MQ, Murphy JK. Issues surrounding lymphadenectomy in the management of endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99(4):232-41.
112. Chan JK, Urban R, Cheung MK, Shin JY, Husain A, Teng NN et al. Lymphadenectomy in endometrioid uterine cancer staging: how many lymph nodes are enough? A study of 11,443 patients. Cancer 2007; 109(12):2454-60.
113. Skarecky DW, Brenner M, Rajan S, Rodriguez E Jr, Narula N, Melgoza F et al. Zero positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: is the end in sight. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5(6):709-17.
114. Smith J, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178(6):2385-90.
115. Patel VR, Shah K, Palmer KJ, Thaly R, Coughlin G. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007; 7(9):1269-78.
116. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49(6):822-30.
117. Sairam K, Dasgupta P. Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: current concepts. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2009; 61(2):115-20.
118. Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Mathe M, Palmer K, Patel VR. Erectile dysfunction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010; 10(5):747-54.
119. The SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery [Internet]. Los Angeles: Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. 2007 [cited: 2010 Apr 6]. 22 p. Available from: http://www.sages.org/publications/publication-pdf.php?id=ROBOT
120. Ontario Case Costing Initiatve. Ontario case costing initiative [Internet]. [updated 2009; cited 2009 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.occp.com/
121. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Classification of Health Interventions - ICD-10-CA/CCI, Version 2006.
122. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario schedule of benefits for physician services under the Health Insurance Act [Internet]. [updated 2010 Mar 24; cited 2010 Apr]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/ohip/sob/physserv/physserv_mn.html
123. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Intellihealth provincial health planning database [Internet]. [updated 2009; cited 2009 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.intellihealth.moh.gov.on.ca/SASWebReportStudio/logoff.do?forceLogoff=true
124. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57(3):453-8.
125. Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L, Robertson CN, Walther P, Albala D et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Urology 2007; 69(2):311-4.
126. Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20(10):827-30.
127. Scales CD, Jr., Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 174(6):2323-9.
128. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: Cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 2004; 172(4 I):1431-5.