The Case for Open Radical Prostatectomy

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 49-55

  Schaeffer, Edward M ^a   Loeb, Stacy ^a   Walsh, Patrick C ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic prostatectomy; Outcome; Prostate cancer; Radical retropubic prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

C REACTIVE PROTEIN; INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 6; SERUM AMYLOID A;

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONVALESCENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FROZEN SECTION; GOLD STANDARD; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PALPATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; URINE INCONTINENCE; WORK RESUMPTION;

HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 75249089920     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.11.008     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Walsh P.C. 2008 Whitmore lecture: radical prostatectomy-where we were and where we are going. Urol Oncol 27 3 (2009) 246-250
2. Walsh P.C., Lepor H., and Eggleston J.C. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4 5 (1983) 473-485
3. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate 39 1 (1999) 71-75
4. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Tewari A., et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168 3 (2002) 945-949
5. Hu J.C., Wang Q., Pashos C.L., et al. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 26 14 (2008) 2278-2284
6. Stolzenburg J.U., Aedtner B., Olthoff D., et al. Anaesthetic considerations for endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98 3 (2006) 508-513
7. Awad H., Santilli S., Ohr M., et al. The effects of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 109 2 (2009) 473-478
8. Cooperberg M.R., Kane C.J., Cowan J.E., et al. Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int (2009) [Epub ahead of print]
9. Feicke A., Baumgartner M., Talimi S., et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases. Eur Urol 55 4 (2009) 876-883
10. Van Velthoven R.F., Ahlering T.E., Peltier A., et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61 4 (2003) 699-702
11. Ghavamian R. The urologic oncologist, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: the need to look through the hype and propaganda and serve our patients. Urol Oncol 27 3 (2009) 233-235
12. Jurczok A., Zacharias M., Wagner S., et al. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 99 6 (2007) 1461-1466
13. Fracalanza S., Ficarra V., Cavalleri S., et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101 9 (2008) 1145-1149
14. Rocco B., Matei D.V., Melegari S., et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int (2009) [Epub ahead of print]
15. Farnham S.B., Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., et al. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 67 2 (2006) 360-363
16. Gianino M.M., Galzerano M., Tizzani A., et al. Critical issues in current comparative and cost analyses between retropubic and robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 101 1 (2008) 2-3
17. Steinberg P.L., Merguerian P.A., Bihrle III W., et al. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 72 5 (2008) 1068-1072
18. Steinberg P.L., Merguerian P.A., Bihrle III W., et al. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS 12 1 (2008) 9-12
19. Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G., et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177 3 (2007) 929-931
20. Emanuel E.J., Fuchs V.R., and Garber A.M. Essential elements of a technology and outcomes assessment initiative. JAMA 298 11 (2007) 1323-1325
21. Erickson B.A., Meeks J.J., Roehl K.A., et al. Bladder neck contracture after retropubic radical prostatectomy: incidence and risk factors from a large single-surgeon experience. BJU Int (2009) [Epub ahead of print]
22. Kundu S.D., Roehl K.A., Egginer S.E., et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172 6 Pt 1 (2004) 2227-2231
23. Stephenson A.J., Kattan M.W., Eastham J.A., et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol 27 26 (2009) 4300-4305
24. Thompson I.M., Tangen C.M., Paradelo J., et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 181 3 (2009) 956-962
25. Chuang A.Y., Nielsen M.E., Hernandez D.J., et al. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178 4 Pt 1 (2007) 1306-1310
26. Smith Jr. J.A., Chan R.C., Chang S.S., et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178 6 (2007) 2385-2389 [discussion: 2389-90]
27. Atug F., Castle E.P., Srivastav S.K., et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49 5 (2006) 866-871 [discussion: 871-2]
28. Yee D.S., Narula N., Amin M.B., et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. J Endourol 23 9 (2009) 1461-1465
29. Tewari A., Rao S., Martinez-Salamanca J.I., et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 101 8 (2008) 1013-1018
30. Patel V.R., Shah S., and Arend D. Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy. Scientific World Journal 6 (2006) 2566-2572
31. Badani K.K., Kaul S., and Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110 9 (2007) 1951-1958
32. Van der Kwast T.H., Bolla M., Van Poppel H., et al. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 25 27 (2007) 4178-4186
33. Vickers A.J., Bianco F.J., Serio A.M., et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 99 15 (2007) 1171-1177
34. Vickers A.J., Savage C.J., Hruza M., et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 10 5 (2009) 475-480
35. Drouin S.J., Vaessen C., Hupertan V., et al. Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 27 5 (2009) 599-605
36. Pound C.R., Partin A.W., Eisenberger M.A., et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281 17 (1999) 1591-1597
37. Stanford J.L., Feng Z., Hamilton A.S., et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. JAMA 283 3 (2000) 354-360
38. Raman J.D., Dong S., Levinson A., et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve. JSLS 11 1 (2007) 1-7
39. Walsh P.C., and Marschke P.L. Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 59 6 (2002) 934-938
40. Rocco F., Carmignani L., Acquati P., et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175 6 (2006) 2201-2206
41. Tewari A., Bigelow K., Rao S., et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 69 4 (2007) 726-731
42. Menon M., Muhletaler F., Campos M., et al. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 180 3 (2008) 1018-1023
43. Kaul S., Savera A., Badani K., et al. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97 3 (2006) 467-472
44. Nielsen M.E., Schaeffer E.M., Marschke P., et al. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 180 6 (2008) 2557-2564 [discussion: 2564]
45. Schroeck F.R., Krupski T.L., Sun L., et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54 4 (2008) 785-793