Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 438-442

  Geisler, John P ^a   Orr, Curtis J ^a   Khurshid, Naumann ^a   Phibbs, Garth ^a   Manahan, Kelly J ^a  

^a Division of Gynecologic Oncology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic; Radical hysterectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINE RETENTION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; ROBOTICS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77952160088     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181cf5c2c     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hockel M. New concepts for surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma. Pathologe. 2005;26:276-282. (Pubitemid 40956542)
2. Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am J Obstet. 1912;66:169-232.
3. Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;33:335-341.
4. Meigs JV. Carcinoma of the cervix-the Wertheim operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1944;78:195-198.
5. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:265-272.
6. Rodriguez M, Guimares O, Rose PG. Radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and subsequent pregnancy in the treatment of early invasive cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:370-374.
7. Smith JR, Boyle DC, Corless DJ, et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma. BJOG. 1997;104:1196-1200.
8. Ishioka S, Endo T, Hayashi T, et al. Successful delivery after vaginal radical trachelectomy for invasive uterine cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006;11:146-149.
9. Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Schlaerth AC. Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:29-34.
10. Del Priore G, Ungar L, Smith JR. Complications after fertility-preserving radical trachelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:227.
11. Plante M, Renaud MC, Francois H, et al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:614-623. (Pubitemid 39194451)
12. Cibula D, Ungar L, Palfalvi L, et al. Laparoscopic abdominal radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:707-709.
13. Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, et al. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage Ib1 cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:111-115.
14. Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, et al. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2000;88:1877-1882.
15. Geisler JP, Linnemeier GC, Manahan KJ. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;98:39-43.
16. Geisler JP, Geisler HE. Radical hysterectomy in patients sixty-five years of age and older. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;53:208-211.
17. Geisler JP, Geisler HE. Radical hysterectomy in the elderly female: a comparison to patients age fifty or younger. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:258-261.
18. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:502-506.
19. Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection-case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27:531-533.
20. Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28:77-82.
21. Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;108:312-316.
22. Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:649.e1-649.e4.
23. Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:96-102.
24. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus class iii radical hysterectomy in stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3-12.
25. Bose P, Regan AF, Paterson-Brown AS. Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. BJOG. 2006;113:919-924.
26. Mendivil A, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, et al. Robotic surgery training in gynecologic oncology: a comparison of fellow and attending surgical times. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112: S8.
27. Ayhan A, Dursun P, Gultekin M, et al. Comparison of midline and Pfannenstiel incision for radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33:161-165.
28. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:679.e1-679.e9.
29. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:86-91.