Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 290-296

  Brandina, Ricardo ^a   Berger, Andre ^a   Kamoi, Kazumi ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPHOCELE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM INJURY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER INJURY; URINE INCONTINENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649739187     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329a356     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001; 165:1964-1966. (Pubitemid 32453508)
2. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pachos CL, et al. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 28:2278-2284. Analysis of oncological outcomes of RaRP.
3. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007; 51:755-762.
4. Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007; 99:1109-1112. (Pubitemid 46587913)
5. Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007; 110:1951-1958. Largest series of RaRP published so far. (Pubitemid 350036853)
6. Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 2008; 73:127-133.
7. Cadeddu JA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: is it feasible and reasonable? Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28:655-661.
8. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 2002; 167:51-56. (Pubitemid 34024496)
9. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 51:648-657. (Pubitemid 46097286)
10. Thompson RH, Blute ML, Slezak JM, et al. Is the GPSM scoring algorithm for patients with prostate cancer valid in the contemporary era? J Urol 2007; 178:459-463.
11. Hull GW, Fabbani F, Abbas F, et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy done in 1000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002; 167:528-534. (Pubitemid 34074521)
12. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, et al. Potency, continence, and complication rates in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162:433-438.
13. Frota R, Turna B, Barros R, Gill IS. Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted. Int Braz J Urol 2008; 34:259-268.
14. Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 2005; 174: 908-911. (Pubitemid 41140627)
15. Gettman MT, Blute ML. Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost. Curr Urol Rep 2006; 7:193-199.
16. Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003; 169:1261-1266. (Pubitemid 36323763)
17. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169:1689-1693. (Pubitemid 36443472)
18. Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61:601-606. (Pubitemid 36294199)
19. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2002; 43:123-133. (Pubitemid 34906734)
20. Nguyen MM, Kamoi K, Stein RJ, et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 101:1135.
21. Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51:996. (Pubitemid 46281421)
22. Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S, et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69:726. (Pubitemid 46574921)
23. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008; 180:1018-1023. Randomized trial assessing early continence after RaRP.
24. Eastham JA. Robotic-assisted prostatectomy: is there truth in advertising? Eur Urol 2008; 54:720-722.
25. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N, et al. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48:938-945. (Pubitemid 41641640)
26. Masterson TA, Serio AM, Mulhall JP, et al. Modified technique for neurovascular bundle preservation during radical prostatectomy: association between technique and recovery of erectile function. BJU Int 2008; 101:1217-1222.
27. Fischer B, Engel N, Fehr JL, John H. Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2008; 26:595-602.
28. Andonian S, Okeke Z, Deidre A, et al. Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDAMAUDE database. Can J Urol 2008; 15:3912-3916.
29. Borden LS Jr, Kozlowski PM, Porter CR, Corman JM. Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. Can J Urol 2007; 14:3499-3501.
30. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 2007; 21:1341-1344.
31. Hu JC, Nelson SA, Wilson TG, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175:541-546. (Pubitemid 43067348)
32. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 177:929-931. (Pubitemid 46216341)
33. Farnham SC, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic. Urology 2006; 67:360-363.
34. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54:785-793. Assessment of patient's opinion after RaRP and ORP.
35. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 2007; 178:478-482. (Pubitemid 47030491)
36. Blute ML. Radical prostatectomy by open or laparoscopic/robotic techniques: an issue of surgical device or surgical expertise? J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:2248-2249.
37. Hu JC, Hevelone ND, Ferreira MD, et al. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008; 180:1969-1974. Analysis of oncological outcomes of RaRP.
38. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 2004; 172 (4 Pt 1):1431-1435. (Pubitemid 39249737)
39. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 2005; 66:101-104. (Pubitemid 41356566)
40. Burges SC, Fatih A, Castle EP, Davis R, et al. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20:827-830. (Pubitemid 44736265)
41. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, et al. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72:1068-1072.
42. Ellison LM, Heaney JA, Birkmeyer JD. The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 163:867-869. (Pubitemid 30091633)
43. Denberg TD, Flanigan RC, Kim FJ, et al. Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA. BJU Int 2007; 99:339-343.