Robotic approach for cervical cancer: Comparison with laparotomy. A case control study

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 60-64

  Maggioni, Angelo ^a   Minig, Lucas ^a,b   Zanagnolo, Vanna ^a   Peiretti, Michele ^a   Sanguineti, Fabio ^a   Bocciolone, Luca ^a   Colombo, Nicoletta ^a   Landoni, Fabio ^a   Roviglione, Giovanni ^a   Vélez, Jorge Ivan ^c  

^a EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Laparotomic radical hysterectomy; Robotic radical hysterectomy; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; ROBOTICS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 69249218936     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.039     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abu-Rustum N.R., et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 91 (2003) 402-409
2. Renaud M.C., et al. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 79 (2000) 59-63
3. Malur S., et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg. Endosc. 15 (2001) 289-292
4. Querleu D., et al. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol. Oncol. 85 (2002) 154-158
5. Spirtos N.M., et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 187 (2002) 340-348
6. Hertel H., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 90 (2003) 505-511
7. Steed H., et al. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 93 (2004) 588-593
8. Gil-Moreno A., et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J. Minim. Invasiv. Gynecol. 12 (2005) 113-120
9. Ramirez P., et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 102 (2006) 252-255
10. Magrina J.F. Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 17 (2005) 343-346
11. Magrina J.F., et al. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer: morbidity and survival. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 181 (1999) 376-381
12. Stylopoulos N., et al. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 83 (2003) 1321-1337
13. Moorthy K., et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 18 (2004) 790-795
14. Ko E., et al. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol. Oncol. 111 (2008) 425-443
15. Patel V.R., et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J. Urol. 174 (2005) 269-272
16. Kho R.M., et al. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 197 (2007) e1-e4113
17. Fanning J., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 198 (2008) 649-651
18. Kim T.K., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol. Oncol. 108 (2008) 312-316
19. Persson J., et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol. Oncol. 113 2 (2009) 185-190
20. Oleszczuk A., et al. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results. Int. J. Med. Robotics Comput. Assist. Surg. 5 (2009) 38-44
21. Lowe M., et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 113 2 (2009) 191-194
22. Nezhat F.R., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 12 3 (2008) 227-237
23. Sert B., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. The future is now. Int. J. Med. Robot. 3 3 (2007) 224-228
24. Boggess J.F., et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 357 199 (2008) e1-e7
25. Magrina J.F., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 109 (2008) 86-91
26. Estape R., et al. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol. Oncol. (2009) 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.009
27. Querleu D. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet. Oncol. 9 3 (2008) 297-303
28. Magrina J., et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects. Gynecol. Oncol. 113 1 (2009) 28-31
29. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
30. Michael Lapsley and from Oct 2002 Brian Ripley (2009). RODBC: ODBC Database Access. R package version 1.2-6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RODBC".
31. Tinn-R Development Team (2004). Tinn-R: an editor for R language and environment statistical computing. URL http://www.sciviews.org/Tinn-R/.
32. Sert B.M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection-case report. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 27 5 (2006) 531-533
33. Hur H.C., et al. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. 14 3 (2007) 311-317
34. Ramirez P., et al. Vaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: a literature review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 57 (2002) 462-467
35. De Iaco P., et al. Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: is vaginal cuff closure associated with a reduced risk?. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 125 (2006) 134-138
36. Zullo F., et al. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193 4 (2005) 1344-1352
37. Obermair A. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J. Minim. Invasiv. Gynecol. 15 5 (2008) 584-588