Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 939-943

  Ploussard, Guillaume ^a   Xylinas, Evanguelos ^a   Paul, Alexandre ^a   Gillion, Norman ^a   Salomon, Laurent ^a   Allory, Yves ^a   Vordos, Dimitri ^a   Hoznek, Andreas ^a   Yiou, René ^a   Abbou, Claude Clément ^a   De La Taille, Alexandre ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67749086482     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0521     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000;163:418-422.
2. Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results. Urology 2000;55: 630-634.
3. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: An analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001; 166:2101-2108.
4. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 2006;49:612-624. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
5. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotassisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Are there any differences? BJU Int 2005;96:39-42.
6. Poulakis V, Dillenburg W, Moeckel M, de Vries R, Witzsch U, Zumbé J, Rassweiler J, Becht E. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Prospective evaluation of the learning curve. Eur Urol 2005;47:167-175.
7. Bollens R, Sandhu S, Roumeguere T, Quackels T, Schulman C. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:79-82.
8. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J; The VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289-2292.
9. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single institution experience. J Urol 2007;178:478-482.
10. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168: 945-949.
11. Schroeck FR, de Sousa CA, Kalman RA, et al. Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology 2008;71:597-601.
12. Castle EP, Atug F, Woods M, Thomas R, Davis R. Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2008;26:91-95.
13. El-Feel A, Davis JW, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 2003;62:314-318.
14. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Conventional and robotic. Urology 2005; 66(suppl 5):101-104.