Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A review of current outcomes

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1428-1435

  Coelho, Rafael F ^a,b   Chauhan, Sanket ^a   Palmer, Kenneth J ^a   Rocco, Bernardo ^a,c   Patel, Manoj B ^a   Patel, Vipul R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Erectile dysfunction; Laparoscopy robotics; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOSIS STRICTURE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; GENITAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDLINE; ONCOLOGY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENIS ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SHORT SURVEY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; IMPOTENCE, VASCULOGENIC; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 72349089279     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08895.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (51)

1. Hayat HJ, Howlander N, Reichman ME, Edwards BK. Cancer statistics, trends and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 2007 12 : 20 37
2. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al. Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study, 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2005 12 : 1977 1984
3. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases 1905. J Urol 2002 168 : 914 921
4. Reiner WB, Walsh PC. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol 1979 121 : 198 200
5. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997 50 : 854 857
6. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000 163 : 418 422 (Pubitemid 30060483)
7. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique. An analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001 166 : 2101 2108 (Pubitemid 33065229)
8. Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 2002 90 : 876 882
9. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001 87 : 408 410
10. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009 55 : 1037 1063
11. Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008 72 : 412 416
12. Berryhill R Jhaveri J, Yadav R et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008 72 : 15 23
13. Rocco R, Lorusso A, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Building a robotic program. Scand J Surg 2009 98 : 72 5
14. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 2006 175 : 541 546
15. Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 2006 175 : 945 950 KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007 110 : 1951 1958
16. Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 2007 52 : 746 750
17. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 2007 178 : 478 482
18. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 177 : 929 931
19. Borin JF, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007 70 : 173 178
20. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al. Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 2007 21 : 1341 1344
21. Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL et al. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007 70 : 945 949
22. Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008 102 : 28 32
23. Chan RC, Barocas DA, Chang SS et al. Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008 101 : 1140 1144
24. Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008 22 : 2299 2305
25. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2008 103 : 448 453
26. Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2009 55 : 1358 1367
27. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2009 103 : 448 453
28. Ham WS, Park SY, Rha KH, Kim WT, Choi YD. Robotic radical prostatectomy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer is feasible. Results of a single-institution study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009 19 : 329 332
29. Fischer B, Engel N, Fehr JL, John H. Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2008 26 : 595
30. Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol 2001 166 : 1729 1733
31. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004 240 : 205 213
32. Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 2008 102 : 1413 1418
33. Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006 49 : 866 871
34. Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 2008 101 : 871 877
35. Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU Int 2008 102 : 603 607
36. Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007 99 : 1109 1112
37. Smith JA Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 178 : 2385 2389
38. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007 51 : 648 657
39. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007 51 : 755 762
40. van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Joshi N, van Muilekom E. Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009 55 : 892 901
41. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003 92 : 205 210
42. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006 175 : 2201 2206
43. Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007 51 : 996 1003 (Pubitemid 46281421)
44. Coughlin G, Dangle PP, Patil NN et al. Surgery Illustrated - focus on details. Modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter: application to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008 102 : 1482 1485
45. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009 56 : 472 478
46. Walsh PC. Anatomical radical prostatectomy. Evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998 160 : 2418 2424
47. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008 180 : 1018 1023
48. Tewari A, Rao S, Martinez-Salamanca JL et al. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008 101 : 1013 1018
49. Finley DS, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing. BJU Int 2009 [Epub ahead of print]
50. van der Poel HG, de Block W. Role of extent of fascial preservation and erectile function after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2009 73 : 816 21
51. Coughlin G, Pankaj D, Palmer KJ, Samavedi S, Patel V. Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 2009 1 : 13 7