A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 322-328

  D'Alonzo, Richard C ^a   Gan, Tong J ^a   Moul, Judd W ^b   Albala, David M ^b   Polascik, Thomas J ^b   Robertson, Cary N ^b   Sun, Leon ^b   Dahm, Philipp ^c   Habib, Ashraf S ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Robot assisted prostatectomy; Robot assisted surgery

Indexed keywords

ANTIEMETIC AGENT; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; CLONIDINE; CREATININE; EPHEDRINE; FENTANYL; HYDRALAZINE; KETOROLAC; LABETALOL; METOPROLOL; MORPHINE; PHENYLEPHRINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG USE; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIQUID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RECOVERY ROOM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

AGED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 69349104587     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Shackley D. A century of prostatic surgery. BJU Int 83 (1999) 776-782
2. Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy. A new extravesical technique. Report on 20 cases. Lancet 2 (1945) 693-696
3. Walsh P.C. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160 6 Pt 2 (1998) 2418-2424
4. Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50 (1997) 854-857
5. Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Barret E., Rozet F., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 36 (1999) 14-20
6. Abbou C.C., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 55 (2000) 630-634
7. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163 (2000) 1643-1649
8. Rassweiler J., Schulze M., Teber D., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients. J Urol 173 (2005) 761-764
9. Trabulsi E.J., and Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173 (2005) 1072-1079
10. Jacobsen N.E., Moore K.N., Estey E., and Voaklander D. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates. J Urol 177 (2007) 615-619
11. Lepor H. Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 24 (2006) 91-93
12. Gettman M.T., and Blute M.L. Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost. Curr Urol Rep 7 (2006) 193-199
13. Ahlering T.E., Skarecky D., Lee D., and Clayman R.V. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170 (2003) 1738-1741
14. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Tewari A., et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168 (2002) 945-949
15. Loulmet D., Carpentier A., d'Attellis N., et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118 (1999) 4-10
16. Rassweiler J., Safi K.C., Subotic S., Teber D., and Frede T. Robotics and telesurgery-an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14 (2005) 109-122
17. Binder J., Bräutigam R., Jonas D., and Bentas W. Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?. BJU Int 94 (2004) 1183-1187
18. Patel V.R., Tully A.S., Holmes R., and Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174 (2005) 269-272
19. Ficarra V., Cavalleri S., Novara G., Aragona M., and Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 45-56
20. Anderson R., Saiers J.H., Abram S., and Schlicht C. Accuracy in equianalgesic dosing. Conversion dilemmas. J Pain Symptom Manage 21 (2001) 397-406
21. Pereira J., Lawlor P., Vigano A., Dorgan M., and Bruera E. Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. A critical review and proposals for long-term dosing. J Pain Symptom Manage 22 (2001) 672-687
22. Reich D.L., Konstadt S.N., Raissi S., Hubbard M., and Thys D.M. Trendelenburg position and passive leg raising do not significantly improve cardiopulmonary performance in the anesthetized patient with coronary artery disease. Crit Care Med 17 (1989) 313-317
23. Wilcox S., and Vandam L.D. Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 67 (1988) 574-578
24. Molloy B.L., Watson C.B., Moriber N., Longchamp C., and Gelinas M. Severe intraocular hypertension and decreased ocular perfusion pressure (MAP-IOP) during steep head-down position during robotic prostatectomy [Abstract]. Anesthesiology 105 (2006) A1693
25. Winter R., and Munro M. Lingual and buccal nerve neuropathy in a patient in the prone position: a case report. Anesthesiology 71 (1989) 452-454
26. Stolzenburg J.U., Aedtner B., Olthoff D., et al. Anaesthetic considerations for endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98 (2006) 508-513
27. Tokics L., Hedenstierna G., Strandberg A., Brismar B., and Lundquist H. Lung collapse and gas exchange during general anesthesia: effects of spontaneous breathing, muscle paralysis, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Anesthesiology 66 (1987) 157-167
28. Kendall A.P., Bhatt S., and Oh T.E. Pulmonary consequences of carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Anaesthesia 50 (1995) 286-289
29. Gerges F.J., Kanazi G.E., and Jabbour-Khoury S.I. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth 18 (2006) 67-78
30. Smith I. Anesthesia for laparoscopy with emphasis on outpatient laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North America 19 (2001) 21-41
31. Dunn M.D., and McDougall E.M. Renal physiology. Laparoscopic considerations. Urol Clin North Am 27 (2000) 609-614
32. Joseph J.V., Vicente I., Madeb R., Erturk E., and Patel H.R. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?. BJU Int 96 (2005) 39-42
33. Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S., et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J Urol 174 (2005) 912-914
34. Le C.Q., and Gettman M.T. Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6 (2006) 1003-1011