Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 359-366

  Martin, Arno ^a   Sheinkop, Mitchell B ^b   Langhenry, Mary M ^b   Widemschek, Mark ^a   Benesch, Thomas ^c   von Strempel, Archibald ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Knee; Minimal invasive; Navigation; Osteoarthritis; Outcome

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 77951296188     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0957-z     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 682-687.
2. Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, Sensi L (2005) Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440: 82-87.
3. Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB (2008) Case report: femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 1499-1502.
4. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2): 26-32.
5. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 372-377.
6. Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2007) Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22: 800-806.
7. Coon TM (2007) Quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive technique for total knee arthroplasty: a new classification. Orthopäde 36: 1113-1119.
8. Dalury DF, Dennis DA (2005) Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440: 77-81.
9. Dalury DF, Mulliken BD, Adams MJ, Lewis C, Sauder RR, Bushey JA (2009) Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 1339-1343.
10. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC (2008) Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 2-9.
11. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 68-73.
12. Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 112-116.
13. Hart R, Janecek M, Cizmar I, Stipcak V, Kucera B, Filan P (2006) Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results. Orthopade 35: 552-557.
14. Hube R, Keim M, Mayr HO (2009) The mini-midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Oper Orthop Traumatol 21: 3-13.
15. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
16. Keblish PA (1991) The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 271: 52-62.
17. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 14-19.
18. King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC, Leopold SS (2007) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 1497-1503.
19. Laskin RS (2007) Surgical exposure for total knee arthroplasty: for everything there is a season. J Arthroplasty 22: 12-14.
20. Lüring C, Beckmann J, Haibock P, Perlick L, Grifka J, Tingart M (2008) Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16: 928-934.
21. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16: 635-640.
22. Martin A, Sheinkop MB, Langhenry MM, Oelsch C, Widemschek M, von Strempel A (2009) Accuracy of side-cutting implantation instruments for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17: 374-381.
23. Martin A, von Strempel A (2006) Two-year Outcomes of Computed Tomography-based and Computed Tomography Free Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 449: 275-282.
24. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M, Oelsch C, Strempel A (2007) Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460: 178-184.
25. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 236-243.
26. Moreland JR (1988) Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226: 49-64.
27. Paley D, Pfeil J (2000) Principles of deformity correction around the knee. Orthopäde 29: 18-38.
28. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW (2002) Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17: 698-705.
29. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 153-156.
30. Rosenberger RE, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C (2008) Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16: 249-257.
31. Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty 21: 777-782.
32. Siston RA, Goodman SB, Patel JJ, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2006) The high variability of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 65-69.
33. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 2276-2280.
34. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM (2003) Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 185-190.
35. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428: 131-139.
36. Wysocki RW, Sheinkop MB, Virkus WW, Della Valle CJ (2008) Femoral fracture through a previous pin site after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23: 462-465.