Selective role of lingual/parahippocampal gyrus and retrosplenial complex in spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to the environmental reference frame

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 242, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 62-75

  Sulpizio, Valentina ^a,b   Committeri, Giorgia ^a   Lambrey, Simon ^c,d   Berthoz, Alain ^c   Galati, Gaspare ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Frames of reference; Lingual parahippocampal gyrus; Perspective change; Retrosplenial complex; Spatial memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; SPATIAL MEMORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ENVIRONMENT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; OXYGEN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872402691     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.031     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Rieser J.J. Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:1157-1165.
2. Easton R.D., Sholl M.J. Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:483-500.
3. Diwadkar V.A., McNamara T.P. Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science 1997, 8:302-307.
4. Maguire E.A., Frith C.D., Burgess N., Donnett J.G., O'Keefe J. Knowing where things are parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:61-76.
5. Simons D.J., Wang R.F. Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science 1998, 9:315-320.
6. Simons D.J., Wang R.F. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition 1999, 70:191-210.
7. Wang R.F., Simons D.J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition 1999, 70:191-210.
8. Mou W., McNamara T.P. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:162-170.
9. King J.A., Burgess N., Hartley T., Vargha-Khadem K., O'Keefe J. The human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory. Hippocampus 2002, 12:811-820.
10. Burgess N., Maguire E.A., Spiers H.J., O'Keefe J. A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. Neuroimage 2001, 14:439-453.
11. McNamara T.P., Rump B., Werner S. Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:589-595.
12. Amorim M.-A. What is my avatar seeing? The coordination of " out-of-body" and " embodied" perspectives for scene recognition across views. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:157-199.
13. Burgess N., Spiers H.J., Paleologou E. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 2004, 94:149-166.
14. Burgess N. Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:551-557.
15. Neggers S.F., Van der Lubbe R.H., Ramsey N.F., Postma A. Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space. Neuroimage 2006, 31:320-331.
16. Schmidt D., Krause B.J., Weiss P.H., Fink G.R., Shah N.J., Amorim M.A., et al. Visuospatial working memory and changes of the point of view in 3D space. Neuroimage 2007, 3:955-968.
17. Lambrey S., Amorim M.A., Samson S., Noulhiane M., Hasboun D., Dupont S., et al. Distinct visual perspective-taking strategies involve the left and right medial temporal lobe structures differently. Brain 2008, 131:523-534.
18. Keehner M., Guerin S.A., Miller M.B., Turk D.J., Hegarty M. Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations. Neuroimage 2006, 33:391-398.
19. Wraga M., Creem S.H., Proffitt D.R. Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:151-168.
20. Wraga M., Shephard J.M., Church J.A., Inati S., Kosslyn S.M. Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1351-1361.
21. Zacks J.M., Michelon P. Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2005, 4:96-118.
22. Hegarty M., Waller D. A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence 2004, 32:175-191.
23. Kozhevnikov M., Hegarty M. A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory and Cognition 2001, 29:745-756.
24. Kozhevnikov M., Motes M.A., Rasch B., Blajenkova O. Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006, 20:397-417.
25. Galati G., Pelle G., Berthoz A., Committeri G. Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 206:109-120.
26. Committeri G., Galati G., Paradis A.L., Pizzamiglio L., Berthoz A., LeBihan D. Reference frames for spatial cognition: different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgments about object location. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1517-1535.
27. Bastin J., Committeri G., Kahane P., Galati G., Minotti L., Lachaux J.P., et al. Timing of posterior parahippocampal gyrus activity reveals multiple scene processing stages. Human Brain Mapping 2012, doi: 10. 1002/hbm.21515.
28. Epstein R.A. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:388-396.
29. Lambrey S., Doeller C., Berthoz A., Burgess N. Imagining being somewhere else: neural basis of changing perspective in space. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 22:166-174.
30. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
31. Galati G., Committeri G., Spitoni G., Aprile T., Di Russo F., Pitzalis S., et al. A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1274-1286.
32. Pitzalis S., Galletti C., Huang R.S., Patria F., Committeri G., Galati G., et al. Wide-field retinotopy defines human cortical visual area V6. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:7962-7973.
33. Pitzalis S., Sereno M.I., Committeri G., Fattori P., Galati G., Patria F., et al. Human v6: the medial motion area. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:411-424.
34. Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Chesler D.A. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992, 89:5675-5679.
35. Tosoni A., Galati G., Romani G.L., Corbetta M. Sensory-motor mechanisms in human parietal cortex underlie arbitrary visual decisions. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1446-1453.
36. Mazziotta J.C., Toga A.W., Evans A., Fox P., Lancaster J. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). NeuroImage 1995, 2:89-101.
37. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain 1988, Thieme, New York.
38. Burock M.A., Dale A.M. Estimation and detection of event-related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: a statistically efficient and unbiased approach. Human Brain Mapping 2000, 11:249-260.
39. Ollinger J.M., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. Neuroimage 2001, 13:210-217.
40. Friston K.J., Josephs O., Rees G., Turner R. Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1998, 39:41-52.
41. Poldrack R.A. Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 2007, 2:67-70.
42. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12:535-540.
43. Friston K.J., Rotshtein P., Geng J.J., Sterzer P., Henson R.N. A critique of functional localisers. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1077-1087.
44. Amorim M., Glasauer S., Corpinot K., Berthoz A. Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: a comparison between two processing modes. Perception and Psychophysics 1997, 59:404-418.
45. Aguirre G.K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to " building" stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron 1998, 21:373-383.
46. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
47. Maguire E.A. The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2001, 42:225-238.
48. Vann S.D., Aggleton J.P., Maguire E.A. What does the retrosplenial cortex do?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 11:792-802.
49. Kobayashi Y., Amaral D.G. Macaque monkey retrosplenial cortex: II. Cortical afferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2003, 466:48-79.
50. Kobayashi Y., Amaral D.G. Macaque monkey retrosplenial cortex: III. Cortical efferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2007, 502:810-833.
51. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:1680-1693.
52. Sylvester C., Wager T., Lacey S., Jonides J., Smith E., Hernandez L., et al. Switching attention and resolving interference: Fmri measures of executive functions. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:357-370.
53. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D.C., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280:747-749.
54. Dehaene S., Kerszberg M., Changeux J.P. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 24:14529-14534.
55. MacDonald A.W., Cohen J.D., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 2000, 288:1835-1838.
56. Aguirre G.K., Detre J.A., Alsop D.C., D'Esposito M. The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex 1996, 6:823-829.
57. Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 1999, 122:1613-1628.
58. Hartley T., Maguire E., Spiers H., Burgess N. The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 2003, 37:877-888.
59. Fletcher P.C., Frith C.D., Baker S.C., Shallice T., Frackowiak R.S.J., Dolan R.J. The mind's eye: precuneus activation in memory-related imagery. Neuroimage 1995, 2:195-200.
60. Berthoz A. Parietal, hippocampal contribution to topokinetic, topographic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 1997, 352:1437-1448.
61. Byrne P., Becker S., Burgess N. Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. The Psychological Review 2007, 114:340-375.
62. Kravitz D.J., Saleem K.S., Baker C.I., Mishkin M. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011, 12:217-230.
63. Margulies D.S., Vincent J.L., Kelly C., Lohmann G., Uddin L.Q., Biswas B.B., et al. Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:20069-20074.
64. Mars R.B., Jbabdi S., Sallet J., O'Reilly J.X., Croxson P.L., Olivier E., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human parietal cortex and comparison with human and macaque resting-state functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:4087-4100.
65. Ino T., Doi T., Hirose S., Kimura T., Ito J., Fukuyama H. Directional disorientation following left retrosplenial hemorrhage: a case report with fMRI studies. Cortex 2007, 43:248-254.
66. Diekmann V., Jurgens R., Becker W. Deriving angular displacement from optic flow: a fMRI study. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 195:101-116.
67. Baumann O., Mattingley J.B. Medial parietal cortex encodes perceived heading direction in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:12897-12901.
68. Park S., Chun M.M. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1747-1756.
69. Habib M., Sirigu A. Pure topographical disorientation: a definition and anatomical basis. Cortex 1987, 23:73-85.
70. Epstein R.A., Parker W.E., Feiler A.M. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:6141-6149.
71. Sugiura M., Shah N.J., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Cortical representation of personally familiar objects and places: functional organization of the human posterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:183-198.
72. Janzen G., van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:673-677.
73. Van Essen D.C.A. Population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage 2005, 28:635-662.