Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 589-595

  McNamara, Timothy P ^a   Rump, Björn ^a   Werner, Steffen ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347533705     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196519     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BRYANT, D. J., & TVERSKY, B. (1999). Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 137-156.
2. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S. Y., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
3. COLLETT, T. S., & BARON, J. (1994). Biological compasses and the coordinate frame of landmark memories in honeybees. Nature, 368, 137-140.
4. COLLETT, T. S., & CARTWRIGHT, B. A. (1983). Eidetic images in insects: Their role in navigation. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 101-105.
5. DIWADKAR, V. A., & McNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
6. EASTON, R. D., & SHOLL, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483-500.
7. ETIENNE, A. S. (1992). Navigation of a small mammal by dead reckoning and local cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 48-52.
8. EVANS, G. W., & PEZDEK, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 13-24.
9. FEIGENBAUM, J. D., & ROLLS, E. T. (1991). Allocentric and egocentric spatial information processing in the hippocampal formation of the behaving primate. Psychobiology, 19, 21-40.
10. FRANKLIN, N., & TVERSKY, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63-76.
11. GALLISTEL, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. GOTHARD, K. M., SKAGGS, W. E., & McNAUGHTON, B. L. (1996). Dynamics of mismatch correction in the hippocampal ensemble code for space: Interaction between path integration and environmental cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 8027-8040.
13. KLATZKY, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1-17). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. LEVINSON, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneaux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. LOOMIS, J. M., KLATZKY, R. L., GOLLEDOE, R. G., CICINELLI, J. G., PELLEGRINO, J. W., & FRY, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
16. MATSUMURA, N., NISHIJO, H., TAMURA, R., EIFUKU, S., ENDO, S., & ONO, T. (1999). Spatial- and task-dependent neuronal responses during real and virtual translocation in the monkey hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2381-2393.
17. MONTELLO, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment & Behavior, 23, 47-69.
18. MOU, W., & McNAMARA, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162-170.
19. MÜLLER, M., & WEHNER, R. (1988). Path integration in the desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85, 5287-5290.
20. PALMER, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation, In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 121-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. PANI, J. R., & DUPREE, D. (1994). Spatial reference systems in the comprehension of rotational motion. Perception, 23, 929-946.
22. RICHARDSON, A. E., MONTELLO, D. R., & HEGARTY, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 741-750.
23. ROCK, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
24. RONACHER, B., & WEHNER, R. (1995). Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 177, 21-27.
25. SHELTON, A. L., & McNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
26. SHELTON, A. L., & McNAMARA, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310.
27. SHOLL, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 615-628.
28. SHOLL, M. J., & NOLIN, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.
29. SRINIVASAN, M. V., ZHANG, S., ALTWEIN, M., & TAUTZ, J. (2000). Honeybee navigation: Nature and calibration of the "odometer." Science, 287, 851-853.
30. TVERSKY, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407-433.
31. VALIQUETTE, C. M., McNAMARA, T. P., & SMITH, K. (2003). Locomotion, incidental learning, and the selection of spatial reference systems. Memory & Cognition, 31, 479-489.
32. WEHNER, R., MICHEL, B., & ANTONSEN, P. (1996). Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 129-140.
33. WEHNER, R., & RÄBER, F. (1979). Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia, 35, 1569-1571.
34. WERNER, S., & SCHMIDT, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large scale spaces. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 1, 447-473.