Consequential validity and science identity research

Identity Construction and Science Education Research: Learning, Teaching, and Being in Multiple Contexts

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 173-188

  Johnson, Angela ^a  

^a ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872286269     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Barman, C. R. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children, 34(1), 30-33.
2. Barman, C. R. (1999). Students' views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 43-54.
3. Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
4. Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 68-103.
5. Basu, S. J., Barton, A. C., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 345-371.
6. Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 466-489.
7. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441-458.
8. Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980.
9. Brown, B., Reveles, J., & Kelly, G. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89, 779-802.
10. Brown, S. W. (2002). Hispanic students majoring in science or engineering: What happened in their educational journeys? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 123.
11. Buxton, C. A. (2010). Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 120-135.
12. Carlone, H. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls' participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 17-34.
13. Carlone, H., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge-and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459-485.
14. Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218.
15. Carlone, H., Kimmel, J., Lowder, C., Rockford, J., & Scott, C. (2011). Exploring the scope and limit of agency in the figured worlds of school science learning: A longitudinal study of students' identities. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
16. Ceglie, R. (2011). Support in the science pipeline: Support factors and persistence of women of color in the sciences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
17. College Board. (2010). Summary reports: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/ testing/ap/exgrd_sum/2010.html
18. Elmesky, R., & Seiler, G. (2007). Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re)shaping of African American students' scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 73-103.
19. EPI. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers: Economic Policy Institute briefing paper #278. Retrieved from www.epi.org
20. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
21. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
22. Haun-Frank, J. (2011). Altruism as an entry point: An examination of African American students' science trajectories. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
23. Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Johnson, A. (2006). Policy implications of supporting women of color in the sciences. Women, Politics and Policy, 27, 135-150.
25. Johnson, A. (2007a). Graduating underrepresented African American, Latino, and American Indian students in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 13, 1-22.
26. Johnson, A. (2007b). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805-821.
27. Johnson, A., Anderson, S. C., & Norlock, K. (2009). A moral imperative: Retaining women of color in science education. Atlantis: A Women's Studies Journal, 33(2), 72-82.
28. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 339-366.
29. Jones, C. P. (2000). Levels of racism: A theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1212-1215.
30. Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation. NY: Crown Publishing.
31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lee, C., & Orfield, G. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA.
33. Manning, K. (1989). Roger Arliner Young, scientist. Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women, 6(2), 3-7.
34. McDuffie, T. E., Jr. (2001). Scientists-geeks and nerds? Science and Children, 38(8), 16-19.
35. NCES. (2009). Figure 14-2: Average science scale scores, by grade and race/ethnicity: 2009. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Education: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/figures/figure-scp-2.asp
36. NSF. (2010). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1997-2006. Detailed statistical table NSF 10300. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/
37. NSF. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Special report NSF 11-309. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
38. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172-209.
39. Popham, J. (2005). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Pearson.
40. Rahm, J. (2007). Urban youths' identity projects and figured worlds: Case studies of youths' hybridization in science practices at the margin. Paper presented at the The Chicago Springer Forum, Science Education in an Age of Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.educ.uvic. ca/faculty/mroth/chicago/
41. Reveles, J. M., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1111-1144.
42. Roth, W.-M. (2006). Making and remaking of self in urban schooling: Identity as dialectic. In J. L. Kinceloe, K. Hayes, K. Rose & P. M. Anderson (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of urban education (pp. 143-153). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
43. Russell, M. L., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 691-715.
44. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving. Boulder: Westview Press.
45. Shah, N. (2011). Federal data shed light on education disparities. Retrieved from http://www. edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/07/01/36data.h30.html?tkn=LMTFFMD%2BTllQa1SJ8YED0zIql2%2 F6Cb6xdm8n&cmp=clp-sb-ascd
46. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
47. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48. Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2008). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginnie. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 43-71.
49. Tonso, K. L. (1999). Engineering gender-gender engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 365-404.
50. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 237-307.
51. Upadhyay, B. (2010). Middle school science teachers' perceptions of social justice: A study of two female teachers. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 56-71.
52. Zahur, R., Barton, A. C., & Upadhyay, B. R. (2002). Science education for empowerment and social change: A case study of a teacher educator in urban Pakistan. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 899-917.