Science literacy and academic identity formulation

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1111-1144

  Reveles, John M ^a   Cordova, Ralph ^b   Kelly, Gregory J ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC IDENTITY FORMULATION; COMMUNICAL SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE LITERACY;

COMMUNICATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 10844288035     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20041     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, F.H. (1934). The argument of Plato (pp. 6-56). London: J.M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
3. Apple, M.W. (1998). The politics of official knowledge: Does national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Record, 95, 222-241.
4. Ballenger, C. (1997). Social identities, moral narratives, scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education, 11, 1-13.
5. Brickhouse, N.W. & Potter, J.T. (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980.
6. Brilliant-Mills, H. (1993). Becoming a mathematician: Building a situated definition of mathematics. Linguistics and Education, 5, 301-334.
7. Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. Wertch (Ed.), Culture communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Crawford, T., Chen, C., & Kelly, G.J. (1997). Creating authentic opportunities for presenting science: The influence of audience on student talk. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 1-13.
9. DeBoer, G.E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. DeBoer, G.E., (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
11. Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teacher's College Press.
12. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
13. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Milroy, & J. Preissle(Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education, (pp. 202-224). San Diego, CA: Academic.
14. Gee, J.P. (2002). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
15. Green, J.L. & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations: A sociolinguistic ethnography. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Gumperz, J.J. (Ed.) (1982). Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (1972). Introduction, directions in sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and Discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
19. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83, 775-796.
20. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin.
21. Kelly, G.J. & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
22. Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., & Crawford T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Science Education, 28, 23-49.
23. Kelly, G.J. & Duschl, R.A. (2002). Toward a research agenda for epistemological studies in science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
24. Kelly, G.J. & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145-181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasely (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 63-82.
27. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
30. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Norris, S. (1997). Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education, 81(2), 239-258.
32. Norris, S.P. & Phillips, L.M., (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
33. Penuel, W.R. & Wertsch, J.V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30, 83-92.
34. Reveles, J.M., Tuyay, S., & Kelly, G.J. (2002). Constructing access to science in bilingual elementary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
35. Roth, W.M. & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 1-24.
36. Slobin, D. (1979). Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
37. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. 1: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
41. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.