Co-fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars in a spent sulfite liquor matrix with genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 130, Issue , 2013, Pages 439-448

  Novy, Vera ^a   Krahulec, Stefan ^a   Longus, Karin ^a   Klimacek, Mario ^a   Nidetzky, Bernd ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Spent sulfite liquor; Xylose fermentation

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; BIOETHANOL; BYPRODUCTS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLYCEROL; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES; SUGARS;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; COFERMENTATION; COMPOUND DISTRIBUTIONS; DRY MATTER CONTENT; ETHANOL YIELD; GENETICALLY MODIFIED; METABOLIC PATHWAY ENGINEERING; PENTOSE FERMENTATION; PENTOSE SUGARS; PRE-TREATMENT; PROCESS CONDITION; PROCESS STAGES; PULP AND PAPER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SPENT SULFITE LIQUOR; UPTAKE RATE; XYLOSE FERMENTATION;

YEAST;

HEXOSE; PENTOSE; SULFITE;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INHIBITION; PH; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; SUBSTRATE; SUGAR; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT; EVOLUTION; FERMENTATION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84872247362     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.115     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Almeida J., Modig T., Roder A., Liden G., Gorwa-Grauslund M.-F. Pichia stipitis xylose reductase helps detoxifying lignocellulosic hydrolysate by reducing 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural (HMF). Biotechnol. Biofuels 2008, 1:12.
2. Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4851-4861.
3. Bellissimi E., Van Dijken J.P., Pronk J.T., Van Maris A.J.A. Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9:358-364.
4. Björling T., Lindman B. Evaluation of xylose-fermenting yeasts for ethanol production from spent sulfite liquor. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1989, 11:240-246.
5. Casey E., Sedlak M., Ho N.W., Mosier N.S. Effect of acetic acid and pH on the cofermentation of glucose and xylose to ethanol by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010, 10:385-393.
6. Chundawat S.P.S., Beckham G.T., Himmel M.E., Dale B.E. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 2011, 121-145. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto. J.M. Prausnitz (Ed.).
7. Eliasson A., Hofmeyr J.-H.S., Pedler S., Hahn-Hägerdal B. The xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase/xylulokinase ratio affects product formation in recombinant xylose-utilising Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2001, 29:288-297.
8. Esterbauer H., Steiner W., Labudova I., Hermann A., Hayn M. Production of Trichoderma cellulase in laboratory and pilot scale. Bioresour. Technol. 1991, 36:51-65.
9. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59:257-268.
10. Hahn-Hägerdal B., Galbe M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Lidén G., Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24:549-556.
11. Hahn-Hägerdal B., Karhumaa K., Fonseca C., Spencer-Martins I., Gorwa-Grauslund M. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74:937-953.
12. Helle S.S., Murray A., Lam J., Cameron D.R., Duff S.J.B. Xylose fermentation by genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae 259ST in spent sulfite liquor. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 92:163-171.
13. Helle S.S., Petretta R.A., Duff S.J.B. Fortifying spent sulfite pulping liquor with hydrolyzed reject knots. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:44-50.
14. Helle S.S., Lin T., Duff S.J.B. Optimization of spent sulfite liquor fermentation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2008, 42:259-264.
15. Holderby J.M., Moggio W.A. Utilization of spent sulfite liquor. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1960, 32:171-181.
16. Johansson E., Brandberg T., Larsson C. Influence of cultivation procedure for Saccharomyces cerevisiae used as pitching agent in industrial spent sulphite liquor fermentations. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38:1787-1792.
17. Kadam K.L., Newman M.M. Development of a low-cost fermentation medium for ethanol production from biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 47:625-629.
18. Kim S.R., Ha S.-J., Kong I.I., Jin Y.-S. High expression of XYL2 coding for xylitol dehydrogenase is necessary for efficient xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14:336-343.
19. Klimacek M., Krahulec S., Sauer U., Nidetzky B. Limitations in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae, made evident through comprehensive metabolite profiling and thermodynamic analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:7566-7574.
20. Koppram R., Albers E., Olsson L. Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:32.
21. Krahulec S., Klimacek M., Nidetzky B. Engineering of a matched pair of xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase for xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. J. 2009, 4:684-694.
22. Krahulec S., Petschacher B., Wallner M., Longus K., Klimacek M., Nidetzky B. Fermentation of mixed glucose-xylose substrates by engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the coenzyme specificity of xylose reductase, and effect of glucose on xylose utilization. Microb. Cell Fact. 2010, 9:16.
23. Krahulec S., Klimacek M., Nidetzky B. Analysis and prediction of the physiological effects of altered coenzyme specificity in xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase during xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 158:192-202.
24. Matsushika A., Inoue H., Kodaki T., Sawayama S. Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:37-53.
25. Olsson L., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 18:312-331.
26. Palmqvist E., Almeida J.S., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 62:447-454.
27. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:25-33.
28. Petschacher B., Leitgeb S., Kavanagh K.L., Wilson D.K., Nidetzky B. The coenzyme specificity of Candida tenuis xylose reductase (AKR2B5) explored by site-directed mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography. Biochem. J. 2005, 385:75-83.
29. Petschacher B., Nidetzky B. Altering the coenzyme preference of xylose reductase to favor utilization of NADH enhances ethanol yield from xylose in a metabolically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 2008, 7:9.
30. Sauer, U., 2001. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes metabolic engineering, in: Nielsen, J., Eggeling, L., Dynesen, J., Gárdonyi, M., Gill, R., de Graaf, A., Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Jönsson, L., Khosla, C., Licari, R., McDaniel, R., McIntyre, M., Miiller, C., Nielsen, J., Cordero Otero, R., Sahm, H., Sauer, U., Stafford, D., Stephanopoulos, G., Wahlbom, C., Yanagimachi, K., van Zyl, W. (Eds.), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 129-169.
31. Sims R.E.H., Mabee W., Saddler J.N., Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1570-1580.
32. van Maris A., Abbott D., Bellissimi E., van den Brink J., Kuyper M., Luttik M., Wisselink H., Scheffers W., van Dijken J., Pronk J. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2006, 90:391-418.
33. van Maris A., Winkler A., Kuyper M., de Laat W., van Dijken J., Pronk J. Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae xylose isomerase as a key component. Biofuels - Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 2007, 179-204. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. L. Olsson (Ed.).
34. Viikari L., Vehmaanperä J., Koivula A. Lignocellulosic ethanol: from science to industry. Biomass. Bioenerg. 2012, 46:13-24.
35. Yu S., Wayman M., Parekh S.K. Fermentation to ethanol of pentose-containing spent sulphite liquor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1987, 29:1144-1150.