Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 327, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 273-284

  Ramani, Arun K ^a   Marcotte, Edward M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Co evolution; Interaction specificity; Phylogeny; Protein interactions

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; ACETYL COENZYME A CARBOXYLASE; BINDING PROTEIN; CHEA KINASE; CHEMOKINE; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR; CIT TYPE REGULATOR PROTEIN; CIT TYPE SENSOR PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING) A; DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING) B; ISOPROTEIN; LYT TYPE REGULATOR PROTEIN; LYT TYPE SENSOR PROTEIN; NAR TYPE REGULATOR PROTEIN; NAR TYPE SENSOR PROTEIN; NTR TYPE REGULATOR PROTEIN; NTR TYPE SENSOR PROTEIN; OMP TYPE REGULATOR PROTEIN; OMP TYPE SENSOR PROTEIN; PROTEIN CHEB; PROTEIN CHEY; PROTEIN PARC; PROTEIN PARE; PYRUVATE DEHYDROGENASE; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SUCCINYL COENZYME A SYNTHETASE; TWO COMPONENT REGULATOR PROTEIN; TWO COMPONENT SENSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 0037436412     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00114-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pruitt K.D., Maglott D.R. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucl. Acids Res. 29:2001;137-140.
2. Hsu S.Y., Nakabayashi K., Nishi S., Kumagai J., Kudo M., Sherwood O.D., Hsueh A.J. Activation of orphan receptors by the hormone relaxin. Science. 295:2002;671-674.
3. Saito Y., Nothacker H.P., Wang Z., Lin S.H., Leslie F., Civelli O. Molecular characterization of the melanin-concentrating-hormone receptor. Nature. 400:1999;265-269.
4. Chambers J., Ames R.S., Bergsma D., Muir A., Fitzgerald L.R., Hervieu G., et al. Melanin-concentrating hormone is the cognate ligand for the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor SLC-1. Nature. 400:1999;261-265.
5. Sprinzak E., Margalit H. Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 311:2001;681-692.
6. Pazos F., Valencia A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47:2002;219-227.
7. Lockless S., Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science. 286:1999;295-299.
8. Lichtarge O., Bourne H., Cohen F. An evoloutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;342-358.
9. Jones S., Thornton J. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272:1997;133-143.
10. Huynen M., Snel B., Lathe W., Bork P. Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitive evaluation and qualitative inferences. Genome Res. 10:2000;1204-1210.
11. Dandekar T., Snel B., Huynen M., Bork P. Conservation of gene order: a finger print of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:1998;324-328.
12. Overbeek R., Fonstein M., D'Souza M., Pusch G.D., Maltsev N. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96:1999;2896-2901.
13. Enright A., Iliopopulos I., Kyrpides N., Ouzounis C. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature. 402:1999;86-90.
14. Marcotte E., Pellegrini M., Ng H., Rice D., Yeates T., Eisenberg D. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 285:1999;751-753.
15. Pellegrini M., Marcotte E.M., Thompson M.J., Eisenberg D., Yeates T.O. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96:1999;4285-4288.
16. Fryxell K.J. The coevolution of gene family trees. Trends Genet. 12:1996;364-369.
17. Goh C., Bogan A., Joachimiak M., Walther D., Cohen F. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299:2000;283-293.
18. Koretke K., Lupas A., Warren P., Rosenberg M., Brown J. Evolution of two-component signal transduction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:2000;1956-1970.
19. Pazos F., Valencia A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14:2001;609-614.
20. Hughes A.L., Yeager M. Coevolution of the mammalian chemokines and their receptors. Immunogenetics. 49:1999;115-124.
21. Kanehisa M. Toward pathway engineering: a new database of genetic and molecular pathways. Sci. Technol. Jpn. 59:1996;34-38.
22. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:1948;379-423.
23. Fraser H.B., Hirsh A.E., Steinmetz L.M., Scharfe C., Feldman M.W. Evolutionary rate in protein interaction network. Science. 296:2002;750-752.
24. Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL. Nucl. Acids Res. 25:1997;31-36.
25. Thompson J., Higgins D., Gibson T. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
26. Kimura M. The Natural Theory of Molecular Evolution. 1983;Cambridge University Press.
27. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP 3.5c (Phylogeny Inference Package). 1993;University of Washington, Seattle.
28. Oppenheim J.J., Feldmann M. Cytokine reference, a compendium of cytokines and other mediators of host defense. Chemokine Reference. 2001;Academic Press, San Diego.
29. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D., Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 220:1983;671-680.
30. Guex N., Diemant A., Peitsch M.C. Protein modelling for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;364-367.
31. Dayhoff M.O., Schwartz R.M., Orcutt B.C. Dayhoff M.O. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. vol. 5:1978;345-352 National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington DC.