Discovering interacting domains and motifs in protein-protein interactions

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 939, Issue , 2013, Pages 9-20

  Hugo, Willy ^a   Sung, Wing Kin ^a   Ng, See Kiong ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Domain SLiM interactions; Protein structural mining; Protein protein interactions; Short linear motifs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871868863     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-107-3_2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ng SK et al (2003) InterDom: a database of putative interacting protein domains for validating predicted protein interactions and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:251-2544
2. Berman HM et al (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):235-2422
3. Finn RD, Marshall M, Bateman A (2005) iPfam: visualization of protein-protein interactions in PDB at domain and amino acid resolutions. Bioinformatics 21(3):410-4122
4. Stein A, Céol A, Aloy P (2011) 3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D718-D7233
5. Kim WK et al (2006) The many faces of protein-protein interactions: a compendium of interface geometry. PLoS Comput Biol 2(9): e1244
6. Jefferson ER et al (2007) SNAPPI-DB: a database and API of structures, iNterfaces and alignments for protein-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Database Issue): D580-D5899
7. Pawson T, Scott JD (1997) Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 278(5346):2075-20800
8. Sudol M(1998) From Src homology domains to other signaling modules: proposalofthe 'protein recognition code'. Oncogene 17:1469-14744
9. Neduva V, Russell RB (2005) Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett 579(15):3342-33455
10. Neduva V, Russell RB (2006) Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17(5):465-4711
11. Diella F et al (2008) Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Front Biosci 13:6580-66033
12. Fox-Erlich S, Schiller MR, Gryk MR (2009) Structural conservation of a short, functional, peptide-sequence motif. Front Biosci 14:1143-11511
13. Vagner J, Qu H, Hruby VJ (2008) Peptidomi-metics, a synthetic tool of drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12:1-55
14. Puntervoll P et al (2003) ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3625-36300
15. Rajasekaran S et al (2009) Minimotif miner 2nd release: a database and web system for motif search. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database Issue):D185-D1900
16. Neduva V et al (2005) Systematic discovery of new recognition peptides mediating protein interaction networks. PLoS Biol 3(12):e4055
17. Davey NE, Shields DC, Edwards RJ (2006) SLiMDisc: short, linear motif discovery, correcting for common evolutionary descent. Nucleic Acids Res 34(12):3546-35544
18. Edwards RJ, Davey NE, Shields DC (2007) SLiMFinder: a probabilistic method for identifying over-represented, convergently evolved, short linear motifs in proteins. PLoS One 2(10): e9677
19. Tan SH et al (2006) A correlated motif approach for finding short linear motifs from protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinfor-matics 7:5022
20. Leung HC et al (2009) Clustering-based approach for predicting motif pairs from protein interaction data. J Bioinform Comput Biol 7(4):701-7166
21. Boyen P et al (2009) SLIDER: mining correlated motifs in protein-protein interaction networks. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ninth IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM) Miami, FL, USA, on December 6-9, pp. 716-7211
22. Aloy P, Russell RB (2006) Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:188-1977
23. von Mering C et al (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417(6887):399-4033
24. Hugo W et al (2010) SLiM on Diet: finding short linear motifs on domain interaction interfaces in Protein Data Bank. Bioinformatics 26 (8):1036-10422
25. Eddy SR (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14:755-7633
26. Finn RD et al (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database Issue):D281-D2888
27. Andreeva A et al (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database Issue):419-4255
28. Cuff AL et al (2009) The CATH classification revisited-architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database Issue): D310-D3144
29. Stark C et al (2011) The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res 39 (Database Issue):D698-D7044
30. Dafas P et al (2004) Using convex hulls to extract interaction interfaces from known structures. Bioinformatics 20(10):1486-14900
31. Alexandrov NN, Fischer D (1996) Analysis of topological and nontopological structural similarities in the PDB: new examples with old structures. Proteins 25(3):354-3655
32. Aung Z, Tan K (2006) MatAlign: precise protein structure comparison by matrix alignment. J Bioinform Comput Biol 4 (6):1197-12166
33. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG (2005) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 (22):10915-109199
34. Stein A, Aloy P (2010) Novel peptide-mediated interactions derived from highresolution 3-dimensional structures. PLoS Comput Biol 6(5):e10007899
35. Torrance JW et al (2005) Using a library of structural templates to recognise catalytic sites and explore their evolution in homologous families. J Mol Biol 347 (3):565-5811