Interrogating Instruction and Intervention in RTI Research With Students Identified as English Language Learners

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 64-88

  Thorius, Kathleen King ^a   Sullivan, Amanda L ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871866660     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2013.741953     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Abedi, J. (2006). Psychometric issues in ELL assessment and special education eligibility. Teachers College Record, 108, 2282-2303.
2. Andrews, E., & Harlen, W. (2006). Issues in synthesizing research in education. Educational Research, 48, 287-299.
3. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4. Artiles, A. J., Bal, A., & King Thorius, K. A. (2010). Back to the future: A critique of response to intervention's social justice views. Theory Into Practice, 49, 250-257.
5. Artiles, A. J., & Klingner, J. K. (2006). Forging a knowledge base on English language learners with special needs: Theoretical, population, and technical issues. Teachers College Record, 108, 2187-2194.
6. Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2010). What counts as response and intervention in RTI? A sociocultural analysis. Psicothema, 22, 949-954.
7. Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J. J., & Higareda, I. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71, 283-300.
8. Artiles, A. J., Sullivan, A., Fierros, E. G., & Klingner, J. (2008, March). The impact of restrictive language policies on special education placements of English learners. Presentation at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New York, NY.
9. Artiles, A. J., Trent, S. C., & Kuan, L. A. (1997). Special education research on ethnic minority students: A twenty-two year analysis of empirical reports in selected refereed journals. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12 (2), 82-91.
10. Artiles, A. J., Trent, S. C., & Palmer, J. D. (2004). Culturally diverse students in special education. In A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 716-735). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
11. Arzubiaga, A., Artiles, A. J., King, K. A., & Harris-Murri, N. J. (2008). Beyond culturally responsive research: Challenges and implications of research as cultural practice. Exceptional Children, 74, 309-327.
12. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Planty, W., Snyder, T., Bianco, K., Fox, M.,Drake, L. (2010). The Condition of Education 2010 (NCES 2010-028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
13. Banks, J. A. (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14. Brown, J. E., & Doolittle, J. (2008). A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for response to intervention with English language learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 66-72.
15. Coleman, M. R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at risk for learning disabilities. Full report. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
16. Connor, M. H., & Boskin, J. (2001). Overrepresentation of bilingual and poor children in special education classes: A continuing problem. Journal of Children & Poverty, 7, 23-32.
17. de Valenzuela, J. S., Copeland, S. R., Qi, C. H., & Park, M. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72, 425-441.
18. Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19. Education Commission of the States. (2003). Improving academic achievement in urban districts: What state policymakers can do. Denver, CO: Author.
20. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31 (8), 21-24.
21. Figueroa, R. A. (2005). Dificultades o desabidades de aprendizaje? [Learning difficulties or learning disabilities?] Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 163-167.
22. Figueroa, R. A., & Newsome, P. (2006). The diagnosis of LD in English learners: Is it nondiscriminatory? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 206-214.
23. Fry, R. (2007). How far behind in math and reading are English language learners? Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
24. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
25. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
26. Gándara, P., & Contreras, F. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11 (36). Retrieved fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/
28. Garcia, E. E., & Cuéllar, D. (2006). Who are these linguistically and culturally diverse students? Teachers College Record, 108, 2220-2246.
29. Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 363-385.
30. *Gerber, M. M., Jimenez, T., Leafstedt, J., Villaruz, J., Richards, C., & English, J. (2004). English reading effects of small-group intensive intervention in Spanish for K-1 English learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 239-251.
31. Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language minority student and special education: Issues, themes and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60, 310-322.
32. *Gilbertson, D., & Bluck, J. (2006). Evaluating responsiveness to intervention for English-language learners: A comparison of instructional pace on letter naming rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 131-147.
33. *Gilbertson, D., Maxfield, J., & Hughes, J. (2006). Evaluating responsiveness to intervention for English-language learners: A comparison of response modes on letter naming rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 259-279.
34. Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education, 22, 213-228.
35. Harn, B. A., Kame'enui, E. K., & Simmons, D. C. (2007). Essential features of interventions for kindergarten students most in need of accelerated learning: The nature and role of the third tier in a primary prevention model. In D. Haager, S. Vaughn & J. Klingner (Eds.), Validated reading practices for three tiers of intervention (pp. 161-184). New York, NY: Brookes.
36. Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
38. *Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Wills, H., Longstaff, J.,Walton, C. (2007). Use of evidence-based, small-group reading instruction for English language learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 153-168.
39. King, K. A., Kozleski, E. B., Artiles, A. J., Sullivan, A. L., Rueb, C., Duran, W.,Herron, B. (2008). Culturally responsive response to intervention models. Professional Learning Module Series. Tempe, AZ: National Center for Culturally Responsive Education Systems.
40. Klingner, J. K., & Edwards, P. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108-117.
41. Klingner, J. K., Sorrells, A. M., & Barrera, M. T. (2007). Considerations when implementing response to intervention with culturally and linguistically diverse students. In D. Haager, J. K. Klingner & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 223-244). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
42. *Koutsoftas, A. D., Harmon, M. T., & Gray, S. (2009). The effect of Tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 116-130.
43. Kovaleski, J. F., Tucker, J. A., & Duffy, D. J. (1995). School reform through instructional support: The Pennsylvania initiative (Part I). Communiqué, 23 (8) [insert].
44. Larson, J. (1994). Violence prevention in the schools: A review of selected programs and procedures. School Psychology Review, 23, 151-164.
45. Law, S., & Lane, D. (1987). Multicultural acceptance by teacher education students: A survey of attitudes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14 (1), 3-9.
46. *Leafstedt, J. M., Richards, C. R., & Gerber, M. M. (2004). Effectiveness of explicit phonological-awareness instruction for at-risk English learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 252-261.
47. Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Education Policy, 23, 767-795.
48. *Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P. T., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Determining English language learners' response to intervention: Questions and some answers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 185-195.
49. *Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390-398.
50. Lovett, M. W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N., & Lacerenza, L. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333-352.
51. MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teachers College Record, 108, 2304-2328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006. 00783.x
52. *McIntosh, A. S., Graves, A., & Gersten, R. (2007). The effects of response to intervention on literacy development in multiple language settings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 197-212.
53. *McMaster, K. L., Kung, S-H., Han, I., & Cao, M. (2008). Peer-assisted learning strategies: A "Tier 1" approach to promoting English learners' response to intervention. Exceptional Children, 74, 194-214.
54. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems. (2005). Cultural considerations and challenges in response-to-intervention models. Retrieved fromwww.nccrest.org/publications/position_statements.html
55. Nieto, S. (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. New York, NY: Longman.
56. Obiakor, F. E. (1999). Teacher expectations of minority exceptional learners: Impact on "accuracy" of self-concepts. Exceptional Children, 66, 39-53.
57. Paine, L. (1989). Orientation towards diversity: What do prospective teachers bring? (Research Report No. 89-9). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
58. Parrish, T., Merickel, A., Perez, M., & Linquanti, R. (2006). Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K-12: Findings from a five-year evaluation (final report). Palo Alto, CA, and San Francisco, CA: American Institutes for Research and WestEd.
59. *Richards, C., Leafstedt, J. M., & Gerber, M. M. (2006). Qualitative and quantitative examination of four low-performing kindergarten English learners: Characteristics of responsive and nonresponsive students. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 218-234.
60. Rubinstein-Avila, E. (2003). An adolescent English language learner struggling with later literacy development: A student's view of the multiple literacies in his life provide insights for teachers of struggling readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47, 290-301.
61. Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 231-247.
62. Schmid, C. L. (2001). Educational achievement, language-minority students, and the new second generation. Sociology of Education, 74, 71-87.
63. Shanahan, T., & August, D. (2006). Report of the National Literacy Panel: Research on teaching reading to English language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Shinn, M. R., & McConnell, S. (1994). Improving general education instruction: Relevance to school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 23, 351-371.
65. Smith, M., Dickinson, D., Sangeorge, A., & Anastasopoulos, L. (2002). Early Literacy and Language Classroom Observation Scale (ELLCO). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
66. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
67. St. Pierre, E. A. (2002). "Science" rejects postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 31, 25-27.
68. Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
69. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-166.
70. Vaughn, S. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
71. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
72. *Vaughn, S., Mathes, P. G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 58-67.
73. Verdugo, R. R., & Flores, B. (2007). English-language learners: Key issues. Education and Urban Society, 39, 167-193.
74. Wagner, R. K., Francis, D. J., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Identifying English language learners with learning disabilities: Key challenges and possible approaches. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 6-15.
75. Waxman, H. C., Tellez, K., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Improving teacher quality for English language learners: Reports and next step recommendations from a national invitational conference. The LSS Review: A Catalyst for Merging Research, Policy, and Practice, 3 (1), 1-3.
76. Welner, K. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
77. Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities: Policy report-Summary of findings related to LEP and SPED-LEP students. Washington, DC: Development Associates.
78. Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
79. Zirkel, P. A., & Krohn, N. (2008, January/February). RTI after IDEA: A survey of state laws. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 71-73.