Improving responsiveness to intervention for English-language learners: A comparison of instructional pace on letter naming rates

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 131-147

  Gilbertson, Donna ^a   Bluck, John ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic intervention; Early literacy; English Language learners; Instructional pace

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749031564     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9013-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Educating language minority students. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1985). The effects of teacher presentation rate and praise on LD students' oral reading performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 295-303.
3. Del Vecchio, A., & Guerreo, M. (1995). Handbook of english language proficiency tests. Albuquerque, NM: Evaluation Assistance Center, Western Region.
4. Donovan, S. M., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Elliot, S. N., Witt, J. C., Galvin, G. A., & Moe, G. L. (1986). Children's involvement in intervention selection: Acceptability of interventions for misbehaving peers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 235-241.
6. Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-second language learners' cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 65, 145-190.
7. Fuchs, L. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172-186.
8. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implication for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
9. García, G. E. (2000). Bilingual children's reading. In M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 813-834). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454-470.
11. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2003). English-language learners with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson & K. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 94-109). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Gersten, R., & Marks, S. U. (1998). Strategies for teaching English-language learners. In K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Teaching every child every day: Learning in diverse schools and classrooms (pp. 208-249). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
13. Gersten R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language-minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60, 310-322.
14. Good, R. H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. (2001). Best practices using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 679-700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologist.
15. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6th Edition (DIBELS). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available at http:///dibels.uoregon.edu.
16. Good, R. H., & Shinn, M. R (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 179-193.
17. Good, R., Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E., Kaminski, R., & Wallin, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Technical Report No. 11). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
18. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley & L. Danielson (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Hall, J. W., & Tinzmann, M. B. (1989). Sources of improved recall during the school years. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 315-316.
20. Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 90-112.
21. Koegel, R. L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. (1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91-99.
22. Martella, R. C., Nelson, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). Research methods: Learning to become a critical consumer, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
23. McCray, A., & García, S. B. (2002). The stories we must tell: Developing a research agenda for multicultural and bilingual special education. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 559-612.
24. Rohena, E. I., Jitendra, A. K., & Browder, D. M. (2002). Comparison of the effects of Spanish and English constant time delay instruction on sight word reading by Hispanic learners with mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 169-184.
25. Skinner, C., Adamson, K. L., Woodward, J. R., Jackson, R. R., Atchison, L. A., & Mims, J. W. (1993). A comparison of fast-rate, slow-rate, and silent previewing interventions on reading performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 674-681.
26. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., & Williams-Wilson, S. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64.
27. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student response rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313-325.
28. Skinner, C., Smith, E. S., & McLean, J. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 98-107.
29. Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69-95.
30. VanderHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2006). Effect of a problem-solving model on identification of children for special education. Manuscript accepted in Journal of School Psychology.
31. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and pitfalls. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
32. Watson, T. S., & Ray, K. P. (1997). The effects of different units of measurement on instructional decision making. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 42-53.