What counts as response and intervention in RTI? a sociocultural analysis;¿Qué se considera como Respuesta e Intervención en RTI? Una perspectiva sociocultural

Psicothema

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 949-954

  Artiles, Alfredo J ^a   Kozleski, Elizabeth B ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CULTURAL FACTOR; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TEACHING; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78549265123     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Artiles, A.J. (2005, November). RTI for all: Reflections on sociocultural questions & challenges. Commemoration of P.L. 94-142. Loyola Marymount University. Los Angeles, CA.
2. Banks, J.A., Au, K.H., Ball, A.F., Bell, P., Gordon, E.W., Gutiérrez, K.D., Heath, S.B., Lee, C.D., Lee, Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N.S., Valdes, G., & Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life deep. Seattle, WA: The Life Center.
3. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A.W., & Feder, M.A. (Eds.) (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, D. C.: National Research Council.
4. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
6. Brunswik, E. (1958). Representative design in the planning of psychological research. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Cole, M., & Bruner, J. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about psychological processes. American Psychologist, 26, 867-876.
9. Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R.P. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.): Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 49-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
11. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Stecker, P. (2010). The «blurring» of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301-323.
12. Gerber, M. (2005). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 516-524.
13. Gibson, M.A. (1991). Minorities and schooling: Some implications. In M.A. Gibson & J.U. Ogbu (Eds.): Minority status and schooling (pp. 357-381). New York: Garland.
14. Greeno, L. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
15. Greeno, J. (2005). Learning in activity. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.): The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gresham, F., MacMillan, D., Beebe-Frankenberger, M., & Bocian, K. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198-205.
17. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. London: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Levin, J.R., Chung, W.H., Hsieh, Y.P., Kim, H., Thomas, G., You, J., & Robinson, D.H. (2005). Is educational intervention research on the decline? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 523-529.
19. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. 1400-87.
20. Jimerson, S.R., Burns, M.K., & VanDerHeyden, A. (Eds.) (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
21. Kavale, K.A., Kauffman, J.M., Bachmeier, R.J., & LeFever, G.B. (2008). Response-to-Intervention: Separating the rhetoric of self-congratulation from the reality of specific learning disability identification. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 135-150.
22. Klingner, J.K., & Edwards, P. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108-117.
23. Lave, J. (1997). What's special about experiments as contexts for thinking. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.): Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 57-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mastropieri, M. (2003, December). What are the feasibility and consequences of response to intervention? Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium. Kansas City, MO.
25. Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284-288.
26. NCCRESt (2005). Cultural Considerations and Challenges in Response-to-Intervention Models: An NCCRESt Position Statement. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
27. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
28. Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81, 6-22.
29. Scribner, S. (1997). The practice of literacy: Where mind and society meet. In E. Tobach, R.J. Falmagne, M.B. Parlee, L.M.W. Martin, & A.S. Kapelman (Eds.): Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner (pp. 190-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Southeast Comprehensive Center (2009, December). Rapid Response-Response to Intervention (RtI) Policy. Rapid Response Request Number 000102. Metairie, LA.
31. Sawyer, R.K. (2005). The new science of learning. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.): The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Seethaler, P.M., & Fuchs, L.S. (2005). A drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 98-102.
33. Swanson, L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.