EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid

New Phytologist

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 165-170

  Sterck, Lieven ^a   Rombauts, Stephane ^a   Jansson, Stefan ^b   Sterky, Fredrik ^b   Rouzé, Pierre ^c   Van De Peer, Yves ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b ALBANOVA UNIVERSITY CENTER   (Sweden)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

EST (expressed sequence tag) data; Evolution; Fossil record; Genome duplication; KS dating; Polyploidy; Populus (poplar)

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENOME; POLYPLOIDY;

ARTICLE; ASPEN; EVOLUTION; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY;

EVOLUTION; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; POPULUS;

POPULUS;

EID: 21244483590     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01378.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 3389-3402.
2. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667-1678.
3. Boguski MS, Lowe TM, Tolstoshev CM. 1993. dbEST - database for 'expressed sequence tags'. Nature Genetics 4: 332-333.
4. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422: 433-438.
5. Brunner AM, Busov VB, Strauss SH. 2004. Poplar genome sequence: functional genomics in an ecologically dominant plant species. Trends in Plant Science 9: 49-56.
6. Eckenwalder JE. 1996. Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, eds. Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, 7-32.
7. Gaut BS. 1998. Molecular clocks and n ucleotide substitution rates in higher plants. In: Hecht MK, Macintyre RJ, Clegg MT, eds. Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 30. New York, USA: Plenum Press, 93-120.
8. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. Acodon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 725-736.
9. Koch MA, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2000. Comparative evolutionary analysis of chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci in Arabidopsis, Arabis, and related genera (Brassicaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 1483-1498.
10. Leskinen E, Alström-Rapaport C. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of Salicaceae and closely related Flacourtiaceae: evidence from 5.8 S, ITS 1 and ITS 2 of the rDNA. Plant Systematic Evolution 215: 209-227.
11. Li WH. 1997. Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
12. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151-1155.
13. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics 3: 35-44.
14. Rudd S. 2003. Expressed sequence tags: alternative or complement to whole genome sequences? Trends in Plant Science 8: 321-329.
15. Schiex T, Gouzy J, Moisan A, de Oliveira Y. 2003. FRAMED: a flexible program for quality check and gene prediction in prokaryotic genomes and noisy matured eukaryotic sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 3738-3741.
16. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu M, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 13627-13632.
17. Sterky F, Bhalerao RR, Unneberg P, Segerman B, Nilsson P, Brunner AM, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Lindvall JJ, Tandre K, Strauss SH, Sundberg B, Gustafsson P, Uhlen M, Bhalerao RP, Nilsson O, Sandberg G, Karlsson J, Lundeberg J, Jansson S. 2004. A Populus EST resource for plant functional genomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 13951-13956.
18. Taylor G. 2002. Populus: arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? Annals of Botany (London) 90: 681-689.
19. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
20. Van de Peer Y. 2004. Computational approaches to unveil ancient genome duplications. Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 752-763.
21. Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Van de Peer Y. 2003. Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids. Plant Cell 15: 2192-2202.
22. Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 2211-2220.
23. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 13: 555-556.