How position dependent is visual object recognition?

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 114-122

  Kravitz, Dwight J ^a   Vinson, Latrice D ^a   Baker, Chris I ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

POSITION INDEPENDENT OBJECT RECOGNITION; VISUAL OBJECT RECOGNITION;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIOR; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RECOGNITION; RETINA FOVEA; REVIEW; TRAINING; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISION; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 39649107956     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.006     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Edelman S. Representations and Recognition in Vision (1999), MIT Press
2. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 3 Suppl (2000) 1199-1204
3. Ullman S. High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition (1997), MIT Press
4. DiCarlo J.J., and Cox D.D. Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 (2007) 333-341
5. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 1019-1025
6. Marr D., and Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 200 (1978) 269-294
7. Marr D. Vision (1982), W.H. Freeman
8. Cox D.D., et al. 'Breaking' position-invariant object recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1145-1147
9. Graf M. Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychol. Bull. 132 (2006) 920-945
10. Dill M., and Edelman S. Imperfect invariance to object translation in the discrimination of complex shapes. Perception 30 (2001) 707-724
11. Dill M., and Fahle M. The role of visual field position in pattern-discrimination learning. Proc. Biol. Sci. 264 (1997) 1031-1036
12. Dill M., and Fahle M. Limited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition. Percept. Psychophys. 60 (1998) 65-81
13. Foster D.H., and Kahn J.I. Internal representations and operations in the visual comparison of transformed patterns: effects of pattern point-inversion, position symmetry, and separation. Biol. Cybern. 51 (1985) 305-312
14. Nazir T.A., and O'Regan J.K. Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system. Spat. Vis. 5 (1990) 81-100
15. Cavanagh P. Size and position invariance in visual-system. Perception 7 (1978) 167-177
16. Biederman I., and Cooper E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20 (1991) 585-593
17. Fiser J., and Biederman I. Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere. Vision Res. 41 (2001) 221-234
18. Ullman S., and Soloviev S. Computation of pattern invariance in brain-like structures. Neural Netw. 12 (1999) 1021-1036
19. Ellis R., et al. Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 41 (1989) 775-796
20. DiCarlo J.J., and Maunsell J.H. Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. J. Neurophysiol. 89 (2003) 3264-3278
21. Hummel J.E., and Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99 (1992) 480-517
22. Olshausen B.A., et al. A multiscale dynamic routing circuit for forming size-invariant and position-invariant object representations. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2 (1995) 45-62
23. Serre T., et al. A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 165 (2007) 33-56
24. Serre T., et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 6424-6429
25. Edelman S., and Intrator N. (Coarse coding of shape fragments) plus (retinotopy) approximate to representation of structure. Spat. Vis. 13 (2000) 255-264
26. Ullman S. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 (2007) 58-64
27. Edelman S., and Intrator N. Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations. Cogn. Sci. 27 (2003) 73-109
28. Ullman S., and Evgeniy B. Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features. Neural Netw. 17 (2004) 833-848
29. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two Cortical Visual Systems (1982), MIT Press
30. Logothetis N.K., and Sheinberg D.L. Visual object recognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19 (1996) 577-621
31. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19 (1996) 109-139
32. Boussaoud D., et al. Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 306 (1991) 554-575
33. Kobatake E., and Tanaka K. Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral-cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 71 (1994) 856-867
34. Tanaka K., et al. Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 66 (1991) 170-189
35. Desimone R., and Gross C.G. Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. 178 (1979) 363-380
36. Gross C.G., et al. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 35 (1972) 96-111
37. Richmond B.J., et al. Visual responses of inferior temporal neurons in awake rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 50 (1983) 1415-1432
38. Ito M., et al. Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 73 (1995) 218-226
39. Lueschow A., et al. Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. Cereb. Cortex 4 (1994) 523-531
40. Schwartz E.L., et al. Shape-recognition and inferior temporal neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80 (1983) 5776-5778
41. Op De Beeck H., and Vogels R. Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 426 (2000) 505-518
42. Logothetis N.K., et al. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5 (1995) 552-563
43. Larsson J., and Heeger D.J. Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 13128-13142
44. Brewer A.A., et al. Visual field maps and stimulus selectivity in human ventral occipital cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1102-1109
45. Merriam E.P., et al. Remapping in human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2006) 1738-1755
46. Aggelopoulos N.C., and Rolls E.T. Scene perception: inferior temporal cortex neurons encode the positions of different objects in the scene. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22 (2005) 2903-2916
47. Rolls E.T., et al. The receptive fields of inferior temporal cortex neurons in natural scenes. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 339-348
48. Hung C.P., et al. Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 310 (2005) 863-866
49. Lavidor M., and Walsh V. The nature of foveal representation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 729-735
50. Seacord L., et al. Role of inferior temporal cortex in interhemispheric transfer. Brain Res. 167 (1979) 259-272
51. Gross C.G., and Mishkin M. The neural basis of stimulus equivalence across retinal translation. In: Haxnad R.W., et al. (Ed). Lateralization in the Nervous System (1977), Academic Press 109-122
52. Biederman I., et al. High level object recognition without an anterior inferior temporal lobe. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 271-287
53. Chelazzi L., et al. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 80 (1998) 2918-2940
54. Sato T. Effects of attention and stimulus interaction on visual responses of inferior temporal neurons in macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 60 (1988) 344-364
55. Sato T. Interactions of visual stimuli in the receptive fields of inferior temporal neurons in awake macaques. Exp. Brain Res. 77 (1989) 23-30
56. Hemond C.C., et al. A preference for contralateral stimuli in human object- and face-selective cortex. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e574
57. Niemeier M., et al. A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. Cereb. Cortex 15 (2005) 325-331
58. McKyton A., and Zohary E. Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 17 (2007) 1164-1172
59. Merigan W.H., and Saunders R.C. Unilateral deficits in visual perception and learning after unilateral inferotemporal cortex lesions in macaques. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 863-871
60. Malach R., et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92 (1995) 8135-8139
61. Curcio C.A., et al. Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236 (1987) 579-582
62. Sereno M.I., et al. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268 (1995) 889-893
63. Van Essen D.C., et al. The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability. Vision Res. 24 (1984) 429-448
64. Hasson U., et al. Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas. Neuron 34 (2002) 479-490
65. Levy I., et al. Center-periphery organization of human object areas. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 533-539
66. Bar M., and Biederman I. Subliminal visual priming. Psychol. Sci. 9 (1998) 464-469
67. Bar M., and Biederman I. Localizing the cortical region mediating visual awareness of object identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 1790-1793
68. McAuliffe S.P., and Knowlton B.J. Long-term retinotopic priming in object identification. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 953-959
69. Newell F.N., et al. The interaction of shape- and location-based priming in object categorisation: Evidence for a hybrid "what plus where" representation stage. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 2065-2080
70. Dill M., and Fahle M. Display symmetry affects positional specificity in same-different judgment of pairs of novel visual patterns. Vision Res. 39 (1999) 3752-3760
71. Cave K.R., et al. The representation of location in visual images. Cognit. Psychol. 26 (1994) 1-32
72. Kahn J.I., and Foster D.H. Visual comparison of rotated and reflected random-dot patterns as a function of their positional symmetry and separation in the field. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 33 (1981) 155-166
73. Bricolo E., and Bulthoff H.H. Translation-invariant features for object recognition. Perception 21 (1992) 59
74. Henderson J.M., and Macquistan A.D. The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Percept. Psychophys. 53 (1993) 221-230
75. Leopold D.A., et al. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 89-94
76. Kovacs G., et al. Position-specificity of facial adaptation. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 1945-1949
77. Afraz, S-R. and Cavanagh, P. Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Res. (in press)
78. Yang T., and Maunsell J.H. The effect of perceptual learning on neuronal responses in monkey visual area V4. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 1617-1626
79. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 457-464
80. Fahle M. Perceptual learning: A case for early selection. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 879-890
81. Kanwisher N. Face and places: of central (and peripheral) interest. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 455-456
82. Wallis G., and Rolls E.T. Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system. Prog. Neurobiol. 51 (1997) 167-194
83. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12 (2002) 162-168
84. Edelman S. Constraining the neural representation of the visual world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 125-131
85. Rousselet G.A., et al. How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 363-370
86. Oliva A., and Torralba A. The role of context in object recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 (2007) 520-527
87. Biederman I., et al. Scene perception: detection and judging object undergoing relational violations. Cognit. Psychol. 14 (1982) 143-177
88. Suzuki S., and Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 1315-1341
89. Olshausen B.A., et al. A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J. Neurosci. 13 (1993) 4700-4719