Behavioral and anatomical consequences of early versus late symbol training in macaques

Neuron

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 608-619

  Srihasam, Krishna ^a   Mandeville, JosephB ^b   Morocz, IstvanA ^c   Sullivan, KevinJ ^a   Livingstone, MargaretS ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; JUVENILE ANIMAL; LEARNING; MACACA; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYMBOLISM; TEMPORAL LOBE;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEARNING; MACACA MULATTA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84856759813     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anstis S. Last but not least. Perception 2005, 34:237-240.
2. Baker C.I., Liu J., Wald L.L., Kwong K.K., Benner T., Kanwisher N. Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:9087-9092.
3. Bell A.H., Hadj-Bouziane F., Frihauf J.B., Tootell R.B., Ungerleider L.G. Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J.Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:688-700.
4. Blasdel G., Campbell D. Functional retinotopy of monkey visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2001, 21:8286-8301.
5. Boussaoud D., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. J.Comp. Neurol. 1991, 306:554-575.
6. Boynton G.M., Engel S.A., Glover G.H., Heeger D.J. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J.Neurosci. 1996, 16:4207-4221.
7. Cantlon J.F., Brannon E.M. How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)?. J.Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2007, 33:32-41.
8. Castro-Caldas A., Nunes M.V., Maestu F., Ortiz T., Simoes R., Fernandes R., de La Guia E., Garcia E., Goncalves M. Learning orthography in adulthood: a magnetoencephalographic study. J.Neuropsychol. 2009, 3:17-30.
9. Changizi M.A., Zhang Q., Ye H., Shimojo S. The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:E117-E139.
10. Cohen L., Dehaene S. Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2004, 22:466-476.
11. Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., Lehéricy S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hénaff M.A., Michel F. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 2000, 123:291-307.
12. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
13. Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999, 9:179-194.
14. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56:384-398.
15. Dehaene S., Pegado F., Braga L.W., Ventura P., Nunes Filho G., Jobert A., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Kolinsky R., Morais J., Cohen L. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 2010, 330:1359-1364.
16. Denys K., Vanduffel W., Fize D., Nelissen K., Peuskens H., Van Essen D., Orban G.A. The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J.Neurosci. 2004, 24:2551-2565.
17. Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Neural mechanism of visual processing in monkeys. Handbook of Neuropsychology 1989, Elsivier Science Publishers, New York. E. Boller, B.V. Grafman (Eds.).
18. Farah M.J. Is face recognition 'special'? Evidence from neuropsychology. Behav. Brain Res. 1996, 76:181-189.
19. Farah M.J., Wilson K.D., Drain M., Tanaka J.N. What is "special" about face perception?. Psychol. Rev. 1998, 105:482-498.
20. Farah M.J., Rabinowitz C., Quinn G.E., Liu G.T. Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2000, 17:117-123.
21. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999, 9:195-207.
22. Fize D., Vanduffel W., Nelissen K., Denys K., Chef d'Hotel C., Faugeras O., Orban G.A. The retinotopic organization of primate dorsal V4 and surrounding areas: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in awake monkeys. J.Neurosci. 2003, 23:7395-7406.
23. Fukushima K., Miyake S., Ito T. Neocognitron: a neural network model for a mechanism of visual pattern recognition. Computer Society Press Technology Series Neural Networks 1988, 136-144. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
24. Gauthier I., Behrmann M., Tarr M.J. Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition?. J.Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:349-370.
25. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:191-197.
26. Glezer L.S., Jiang X., Riesenhuber M. Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the "visual word form area" Neuron 2009, 62:199-204.
27. Goren C.C., Sarty M., Wu P.Y. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 1975, 56:544-549.
28. Hebb D.O. The Organization of Behavior; a Neuropsychological Theory 1949, Wiley, New York.
29. Hensch T.K. Critical period regulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:549-579.
30. Hubel D.H., Freeman D.C. Projection into the visual field of ocular dominance columns in macaque monkey. Brain Res. 1977, 122:336-343.
31. Hubel D.H., Livingstone M.S. Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18. J.Neurosci. 1987, 7:3378-3415.
32. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1977, 198:1-59.
33. Johnson M.H., Dziurawiec S., Ellis H., Morton J. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 1991, 40:1-19.
34. Kanwisher N.G., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J.Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
35. Kanwisher N., Tong F., Nakayama K. The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition 1998, 68:B1-B11.
36. Kolster H., Mandeville J.B., Arsenault J.T., Ekstrom L.B., Wald L.L., Vanduffel W. Visual field map clusters in macaque extrastriate visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:7031-7039.
37. Kourtzi Z., DiCarlo J.J. Learning and neural plasticity in visual object recognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16:152-158.
38. Leite F.P., Tsao D., Vanduffel W., Fize D., Sasaki Y., Wald L.L., Dale A.M., Kwong K.K., Orban G.A., Rosen B.R., et al. Repeated fMRI using iron oxide contrast agent in awake, behaving macaques at 3 Tesla. Neuroimage 2002, 16:283-294.
39. Livingstone M.S., Hubel D.H. Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 1984, 4:309-356.
40. Livingstone M.S., Srihasam K., Morocz I.A. The benefit of symbols: monkeys show linear, human-like, accuracy when using symbols to represent scalar value. Anim. Cogn. 2010, 13:711-719.
41. Mandeville J.B., Marota J.J., Ayata C., Zaharchuk G., Moskowitz M.A., Rosen B.R., Weisskoff R.M. Evidence of a cerebrovascular postarteriole windkessel with delayed compliance. J.Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999, 19:679-689.
42. McCarthy G., Puce A., Gore J.C., Allison T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J.Cogn. Neurosci. 1997, 9:605-610.
43. McLaren D.G., Kosmatka K.J., Oakes T.R., Kroenke C.D., Kohama S.G., Matochik J.A., Ingram D.K., Johnson S.C. A population-average MRI-based atlas collection of the rhesus macaque. Neuroimage 2009, 45:52-59.
44. Moeller S., Freiwald W.A., Tsao D.Y. Patches with links: a unified system for processing faces in the macaque temporal lobe. Science 2008, 320:1355-1359.
45. Op de Beeck H.P., Deutsch J.A., Vanduffel W., Kanwisher N.G., DiCarlo J.J. A stable topography of selectivity for unfamiliar shape classes in monkey inferior temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:1676-1694.
46. Polk T.A., Farah M.J. Brain localization for arbitrary stimulus categories: a simple account based on Hebbian learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:12370-12373.
47. Price C.J., Moore C.J., Friston K.J. Subtractions, conjunctions, and interactions in experimental design of activation studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1997, 5:264-272.
48. Rolls E.T., Tovee M.J. The responses of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the macaque when more than one stimulus is present in the receptive field. Exp. Brain Res. 1995, 103:409-420.
49. Saleem K.S., Logothetis N. A Combined MRI and Histology Atlas of the Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2007, Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
50. Sawamura H., Georgieva S., Vogels R., Vanduffel W., Orban G.A. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptationandsize invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys. J.Neurosci. 2005, 25:4294-4306.
51. Sereno M.I., Dale A.M., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1995, 268:889-893.
52. Sohal V.S., Hasselmo M.E. A model for experience-dependent changes in the responses of inferotemporal neurons. Network 2000, 11:169-190.
53. Srihasam K., Sullivan K., Savage T., Livingstone M.S. Noninvasive functional MRI in alert monkeys. Neuroimage 2010, 51:267-273.
54. Sugita Y. Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:394-398.
55. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q.J. Exp. Psychol. A 1993, 46:225-245.
56. Tootell R.B., Silverman M.S., De Valois R.L., Jacobs G.H. Functional organization of the second cortical visual area in primates. Science 1983, 220:737-739.
57. Tsao D.Y., Livingstone M.S. Mechanisms of face perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 31:411-437.
58. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A., Knutsen T.A., Mandeville J.B., Tootell R.B. Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:989-995.
59. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A., Tootell R.B., Livingstone M.S. A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science 2006, 311:670-674.
60. Van der Loos H., Woolsey T.A. Somatosensory cortex: structural alterations following early injury to sense organs. Science 1973, 179:395-398.
61. Vanduffel W., Fize D., Mandeville J.B., Nelissen K., Van Hecke P., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B., Orban G.A. Visual motion processing investigated using contrast agent-enhanced fMRI in awake behaving monkeys. Neuron 2001, 32:565-577.
62. Wiesel T.N. Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. Nature 1982, 299:583-591.
63. Wiesel T.N., Hubel D.H. Ordered arrangement of orientation columns in monkeys lacking visual experience. J.Comp. Neurol. 1974, 158:307-318.
64. Yin R. Looking at upside-down faces. J.Exp. Psychol. 1969, 81:141-145.
65. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 2004, 44:889-898.