Connections between the medial temporal cortex and the CA1 subfield of the hippocampal formation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata)

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 423, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 282-298

  Yukie, Masao ^a  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ammon's horn; Inferotemporal cortex; Memory; Perirhinal cortex; Posterior parahippocampal cortex

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA; MEMORY; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; FLUORESCENT DYES; HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONS; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; TEMPORAL LOBE; WHEAT GERM AGGLUTININ-HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE CONJUGATE;

EID: 0034710312     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000724)423:2<282::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alvarado MC, Mishkin M, Bachevalier J. 1998. Neurotoxic lesions of the hippocampal formation impair monkey's acquisition of the transverse patterning problem. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:928.
2. Alvarez P, Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. 1995. Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting impairment in monkeys. J Neurosci 15:3796-3807.
3. Amaral DG, Insausti R, Cowan WM. 1983. Evidence for a direct projection from the superior temporal gyrus to the entorhinal cortex in the monkey. Brain Res 275:263-277.
4. Amaral DG, Insausti R, Cowan WM. 1987. The entorhinal cortex of the monkey. I. Cytoarchitectonic organization. J Comp Neurol 264:326-355.
5. Angeli SJ, Murray EA, Mishkin M. 1993. Hippocampectomized monkeys can remember one place but not two. Neuropsychologia 31:1021-1030.
6. Bachevalier J, Meunier M. 1996. Cerebral ischemia: are the memory deficits associated with hippocampal cell loss? Hippocampus 6:553-560.
7. Beason-Held LL, Rosene DL, Killiany J, Moss MB. 1999. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 9:562-574.
8. Blatt GJ, Rosene DL. 1998. Organization of direct hippocampal efferent projections to the cerebral cortex of the rhesus monkey: projections from CA1, prosubiculum, and subiculum to the temporal lobe. J Comp Neurol 392:92-114.
9. Bonin G von, Bailey P. 1947. The neocortex of Macaca mulatta. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10. Boussaoud D, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. 1991. Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. J Comp Neurol 306:554-576.
11. Brodmann K. 1909. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig: Barth.
12. Buzsáki G, Penttonen M, Bragin A, Nádasdy Z, Chrobak JJ. 1995. Possible physiological role of the perforant path-CA1 projection. Hippocampus 5:141-146.
13. Cahusac PMB, Miyashita Y, Rolls ET. 1989. Responses of hippocampal formation neurons in the monkey related to delayed spatial response and object-place memory tasks. Behav Brain Res 33:229-240.
14. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H. 1994. Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
15. Colombo M, Fernandez T, Nakamura K, Gross CG. 1998. Functional differentiation along the anterior-posterior axis of the hippocampus in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 80:1002-1005.
16. Distler C, Boussaoud D, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG.1993. Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 334:125-150.
17. Gaffan D, Harrison S. 1989. Place memory and scene memory: effects of fornix transection in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 74:202-212.
18. Gaffan D, Murray EA. 1992. Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. Behav Neurosci 106:30-38.
19. George PJ, Horel JA, Cirillo RA. 1989. Reversible cold lesions of the parahippocampal gyrus in monkeys result in deficits on the delayed match-to-sample and other visual tasks. Behav Brain Res 34:163-178.
20. Gower EC. 1982. A Nissl stain for glutaraldehyde-perfused tissue. In: Mesulam M-M, editor: Tracing neural connections with horseradish peroxidase. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p 131-132.
21. Higuchi S, Miyashita Y. 1996. Formation of mnemonic neuronal responses to visual paired associates in inferotemporal cortex is impaired by perirhinal and entorhinal lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:739-743.
22. Insausti R, Amaral DG, Cowan WM. 1987. The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 264:356-395.
23. Itaya SK, Van Hoesen GW, Barnes CL. 1986. Anterograde transsynaptic transport of WGA-HRP in the limbic system of rat and monkey. Brain Res 398:397-402.
24. Iwai E, Yukie M. 1987. Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modality-specific visual cortical areas in macaques (Macaca fuscata, M. mulatta and M. fascicularis). J Comp Neurol 261:362-387.
25. Iwai E, Yukie M. 1988. A direct projection from hippocampal field CA1 to ventral area TE of the inferotemporal cortex in the monkey. Brain Res 444:397-401.
26. Kosel KC, Van Hoesen GW, Rosene DL. 1983. A direct projection from the perirhinal cortex to the subiculum in the rat. Brain Res 269:347-351.
27. Liu P, Bilky DK. 1996. Direct connection between perirhinal cortex and hippocampus is a major constituent of the lateral perforant path. Hippocampus 6:125-134.
28. Lorente de Nó R. 1934. Studies on the structure of the cerebral cortex. II. Continuation of the study of the ammonic system. J Psychol Neurol 46:113-177.
29. Mesulam M-M. 1982. Principles of horseradish peroxidase neurohistochemistry and their applications for tracing neural pathways: axonal transport, enzyme histochemistry, and light microscopic analysis. In: Mesulam M-M, editor: Tracing neuronal connections with horseradish peroxidase. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. p 1-51.
30. Meunier M, Bachevalier J, Mishkin M, Murray EA. 1993. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 13:5418-5432.
31. Meunier M, Hadfield W, Bachevalier J, Murray EA. 1996. Effects of rhinal cortical lesions combined with hippocampectomy on visual recognition memory in rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 75:1190-1205.
32. Mishkin M. 1978. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 273: 297-298.
33. Mishkin M. 1982. A memory system in the monkey. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 298:85-95.
34. Miyashita Y, Rolls ET, Cahusac PMB, Niki H, Feigenbaum JD. 1989. Activity of hippocampal neurons in the monkey related to a conditional spatial response task. J Neurophysiol 61:669-678.
35. Ono T, Nakamura K, Nishijo H, Eifuku S. 1993. Monkey hippocampal neurons related to spatial and nonspatial functions. J Neurophysiol 70:1516-1529.
36. Parkinson JK, Murray EA, Mishkin M. 1988. A selective mnemonic role for the hippocampus in monkeys: memory for the location of objects. J Neurosci 8:4159-4167.
37. Pohl W. 1973. Dissociation of spatial discrimination deficits following frontal and parietal lesions in monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 82:227-239.
38. Rempel-Clower NL, Zola SM, Squire LR, Amaral DG. 1996. Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci 16:5233-5255.
39. Ridley RM, Timothy CJ, Maclean CJ, Baker HF. 1995. Conditional learning and memory impairments following neurotoxic lesion of the CA1 field of the hippocampus. Neuroscience 67:263-275.
40. Rockland KS, Van Hoesen GW. 1999. Some temporal and parietal connections converge in CA1 of the primate hippocampus. Cereb Cortex 9:232-237.
41. Rolls ET. 1990. Functions of neural networks in the hippocampus and of back projections within and to the cerebral cortex in memory. In: Squire LR, Mishkin M, Shimamura A, editors: Learning and memory, discussions in neuroscience, vol VI, nos 3 and 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 81-85.
42. Rolls ET. 1996. A theory of hippocampal function in memory. Hippocampus 6:601-620.
43. Rolls ET, Miyashita Y, Cahusac PMB, Kesner RP, Niki H, Feigenbaum JD, Bach L. 1989. Hippocampal neurons in the monkey with activity related to the place in which a stimulus is shown. J Neurosci 9:1835-1845.
44. Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. 1977. Hippocampal efferents reach widespread areas of the cerebral cortex and amygdala in the rhesus monkey. Science 198:315-317.
45. Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. 1983. Architectonics and connections of the posterior parahippocampal gyrus in the rhesus monkey. Soc Neurosci Abstr 9:222.
46. Rosene DL, Van Hoesen GW. 1987. The hippocampal formation of the primate brain: a review of some comparative aspects of cytoarchitecture and connections. In: Jones EG, Peters A, editors: Cerebral cortex, vol 6: Further aspects of cortical function, including hippocampus. New York: Plenum Press. p 345-456.
47. Sakata H, Shibutani H, Kawano K, Harrington TL. 1985. Neural mechanisms of space vision in the parietal association cortex of the monkey. Vision Res 25:453-463.
48. Saleem KS, Hashikawa T. 1998. Connections of anterior inferotemporal area TE and perirhinal cortex with the hippocampal formation in the macaque monkey. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:898.
49. Saleem KS, Tanaka K. 1996. Divergent projections from the anterior inferotemporal area TE to the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 16:4757-4775.
50. Saunders RC, Rosene DL. 1988. A comparison of the efferents of the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey: I. Convergence in the entorhinal, prorhinal and perirhinal cortices. J Comp Neurol 271:153-184.
51. Schwerdtfeger WK. 1979. Direct efferent and afferent connections of the hippocampus with the neocortex in the marmoset monkey. Am J Anat 156:77-83.
52. Scoville WB, Milner B. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:11-21.
53. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. 1976. Some cortical projections to the parahippocampal area in the rhesus monkey. Exp Neurol 50:146-160.
54. Shi C-J, Rockland KS, Van Hoesen GW. 1994. Non-perforant projections from visual association cortex to the hippocampus in the macaque. Soc Neurosci Abstr 20:356.
55. Squire LR. 1987. Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan SM. 1991. The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science 253:1380-1385.
57. Squire LR, Zola SM. 1996. Ischemic brain damage and memory impairment: a commentary. Hippocampus 6:546-552.
58. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1990. Cortical inputs to the CA1 field of the monkey hippocampus originate from the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex but not from area TE. Neurosci Lett 115:43-48.
59. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994a. Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices. J Neurosci 14:1856-1877.
60. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994b. The perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 350:497-533.
61. Tranel D, Brady DR, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR. 1988. Parahippocampal projections to posterior auditory association cortex (area Tpt) in Old World monkeys. Exp Brain Res 70:406-416.
62. Van Hoesen GW. 1982. The parahippocampal gyrus: new observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey. Trends Neurosci 5:345-350.
63. Van Hoesen GW. 1990. Hippocampal cortical and subcortical neural systems: their origins and targets in the monkey. In: Squire LR, Mishkin M, Shimamura A, editors: Discussions in neuroscience, vol VI, nos 3 and 4, Learning and memory. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 20-28.
64. Van Hoesen GW, Pandya DN. 1975a. Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents. Brain Res 95:1-24.
65. Van Hoesen GW, Pandya DN. 1975b. Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections. Brain Res 95:39-59.
66. Van Hoesen GW, Pandya DN, Butter N. 1972. Cortical afferents to the entorhinal cortex of the rhesus monkey. Science 175:1471-1473.
67. Van Hoesen GW, Rosene DL, Mesulam M-M. 1979. Subicular input from temporal cortex in the rhesus monkey. Science 205:608-610.
68. Watanabe T, Niki H. 1985. Hippocampal unit activity and delayed response in the monkey. Brain Res 325:241-254.
69. Webster MJ, Ungerleider LG, Bachevalier J. 1991. Connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO with medial temporal structures in infant and adult monkeys. J Neurosci 11:1095-1116.
70. Wellman BJ, Rockland KS. 1997. Divergent cortical connections to entorhinal cortex from area TF in the macaque. J Comp Neurol 389:361-376.
71. Witter MP, Amaral DG. 1991. Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: V. Projections to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subicular complex. J Comp Neurol 307:437-459.
72. Witter MP, Van Hoesen GW, Amaral DG. 1989. Topographical organization of the entorhinal projection to the dentate gyrus of the monkey. J Neurosci 9:216-228.
73. Yukie M. 1993. Organization of the hippocampal projections to the parahippocampal and inferotemporal cortices in the macaque monkey. Soc Neurosci Abstr 19:357.
74. Yukie M, Iwai E. 1988. Direct projections from the ventral TE area of the inferotemporal cortex to hippocampal field CA1 in the monkey. Neurosci Lett 88:6-10.
75. Yukie M, Konagaya H. 1996. Laminar distribution of terminals of projections from area TF and the posterior ventral part of area TE to anterior inferior temporal gyrus in Japanese monkeys. Neurosci Res Suppl 20:S198.
76. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. 1986. Memory impairment in monkeys following lesions limited to the hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 100:155-160.
77. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG. 1986. Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. J Neurosci 6:2950-2967.
78. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG, Suzuki WA. 1989. Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J Neurosci 9:4355-4370.
79. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Rempel NL, Clower RP, Amaral DG. 1992. Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci 12:2582-2596.
80. Zola SM, Squire LR, Teng E, Stefanacci L, Buffalo WA, Clark RE. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J Neurosci 20:451-463.