(Coarse coding of shape fragments)+(retinotopy)≈representation of structure

Spatial Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 255-264

  Edelman, Shimon ^a   Intrator, Nathan ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE CODING; VISION;

OBJECT REPRESENTATION; RETINOTOPY;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; REVIEW; VISUAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RETINA; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0034514457     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856800741072     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bar, M. and Biederman, I. (1998). Subliminal visual priming, Psychological Science 9 (6), 464-469.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding, Psychol. Review 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1506-1514.
4. Bienenstock, E. and Geman, S. (1995). Compositionality in neural systems, in: The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Arbib, M. A. (Ed.), pp. 223-226. MIT Press.
5. Burl, M. C., Weber, M. and Perona, P. (1998). A probabilistic approach to object recognition using local photometry and global geometry, in: Proc. 4th Europ. Conf. Comput. Vision, Burkhardt, H. and Neumann, B. (Eds), LNCS-Series Vol. 1406-1407, pp. 628-641. Springer-Verlag.
6. Camps, O. I., Huang, C.-Y. and Kanungo, T. (1998). Hierarchical organization of appearance-based parts and relations for object recognition, in: Proc. ICCV, pp. 685-691. IEEE.
7. Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L. and Van Essen, D. C. (1997). Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4, J. Neurosci. 17, 3201-3214.
8. Dill, M. and Edelman, S. (1997). Translation invariance in object recognition, and its relation to other visual transformations, A. I. Memo No. 1610, MIT.
9. Duvdevani-Bar, S. and Edelman, S. (1999). Visual recognition and categorization on the basis of similarities to multiple class prototypes, Intern. J. Computer Vision 33, 201-228.
10. Edelman, S. (1994). Biological constraints and the representation of structure in vision and language, Psycoloquy 5 (57); FTP host: ftp.princeton.edu; FTP directory: /pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1994. volume.5/; file name: psyc.94.5.57.language-network.3.edelman.
11. Edelman, S. (1998). Representation is representation of similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 449-498.
12. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and Recognition in Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Edelman, S. and Intrator, N. (2000). A framework for object representation that is shallowly structural, recursively compositional, and effectively systematic (in preparation).
14. Edelman, S. and Newell, F. N. (1998). On the representation of object structure in human vision: evidence from differential priming of shape and location. CSRP 500, University of Sussex.
15. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
16. Hummel, J. E. (1999). Where view-based theories of human object recognition break down: the role of structure in human shape perception, in: Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual Change in Humans and Machines, Ch. 7, Dietrich, E. and Markman, A. (Eds). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Hummel, J. E. and Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition, Psychological Review 99, 480-517.
18. Kobatake, E. and Tanaka, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex, J. Neurophysiol. 71, 856-867.
19. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J. and Poggio, T. (1995). Shape recognition in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys, Current Biology 5, 552-563.
20. Logothetis, N. K. and Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 577-621.
21. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional structure, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 200, 269-294.
22. Nelson, R. C. and Selinger, A. (1998). Large-scale tests of a keyed, appearance-based 3-D object recognition system, Vision Research 38, 2469-2488.
23. Poggio, T. and Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects, Nature 343, 263-266.
24. Rainer, G., Asaad, W. and Miller, E. K. (1998). Memory fields of neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15008-15013.
25. Rolls, E. T. (1996). Visual processing in the temporal lobe for invariant object, recognition, in: Neurobiology, Torre, V. and Conti, T. (Eds), pp. 325-353. Plenum Press, New York.
26. Stainvas, I., Intrator, N. and Moshaiov, A. (1999). Improving recognition via reconstruction (preprint).
27. Stankiewicz, B. and Hummel, J. (1996). MetriCat: a representation for basic and subordinate-level classification, in: Proc. 18th Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Society, Cottrell, G. W. (Ed.), pp. 254-259, San Diego, CA.
28. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 109-139.
29. Tanaka, K., Saito, H., Fukada, Y. and Moriya, M. (1991). Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey, J. Neurophysiol. 66, 170-189.
30. Tarr, M. J. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1494-1505.
31. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6, 171-178.
32. Tsunoda, K., Nishizaki, M., Rajagopalan, U. and Tanifuji, M. (1998). Optical imaging of functional structure evoked by complex and simplified objects in Macaca area TE, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 24, 897.
33. Wallach, H. and Austin-Adams, P. (1954). Recognition and the localization of visual traces, Amer. J. Psychol. 67, 338-340.
34. Wang, G., Tanaka, K. and Tanifuji, M. (1996). Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey inferotemporal cortex, Science 272, 1665-1668.