Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 242-256

  Roskes, Marieke ^a   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a   Nijstad, Bernard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Approach; Avoidance; Creativity; Depletion; Motivation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CREATIVITY; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; CREATIVITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871694348     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028442     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
2. Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141-1152. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00104-6
3. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338-375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338
4. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
5. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011a). Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1107-1115. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.009
6. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011b). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794-809. doi:10.1037/a0022981
7. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839. doi:10.1038/nrn1201
8. Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2011). Category assignment and relatedness in the group ideation process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1070-1077. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.007
9. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B.,& Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33-68. doi:10.1080/14792779443000003
10. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high- functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499
11. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2009). Influence of peripheral and motivational cues on rigid-flexible functioning: Perceptual, behavioral, and cognitive aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 201-217. doi:10.1037/a0015379
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
14. De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
15. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648-661. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.648
16. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased flexibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 72- 80. doi:10.1177/1948550610381789
17. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad., B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656-669. doi:10.1177/ 0146167211435795
18. Diehl, M. (1991). Kollektive Kreativität: Zur Quantität und Qualität der Ideenproduktion in Kleingruppen [Collective creativity: To the quantity and quality of the idea production in small groups]. Unpublished postdoctoral thesis, University of Tübingen.
19. Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 746-761. doi:10.1016/ j.concog.2004.07.002
20. Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822-848. doi:10.1037/a0019749
21. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, i-113.
22. Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 652-663. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.72.3.652
23. Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728-741. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.728
24. Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111-116. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
25. Elliot, A. J. (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
26. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461- 475. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
27. Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Binser, M. J., Friedman, R., & Pekrun, R. (2009). The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 365-375. doi: 10.1177/0146167208328330
28. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
29. Evans, J. S. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
30. Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 381-393. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0024
31. Fishbach, A., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2011). How feedback influences persistence, disengagement, and change in goal pursuit. In J. Forgas & A. Kruglanski (Series Eds.), H. Aarts, & A. J. Elliot (Vol. Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology: Goal-directed behavior (pp. 203-230). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32. Fishbach, A., Zhang, Y., & Koo, M. (2009). The dynamics of selfregulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 315-344. doi: 10.1080/10463280903275375
33. Förster, J., Epstude, K., & Ozelsel, A. (2009). Why love has wings and sex has not: How reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1479-1491. doi:10.1177/0146167209342755
34. Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
35. Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115- 1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115
36. Friedman, R. S. (2009). Reinvestigating the effects of promised reward on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 258-264. doi:10.1080/ 10400410902861380
37. Friedman, R., & Elliot, A. J. (2008). The effect of arm crossing on persistence and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 449-461. doi:10.1002/ejsp.444
38. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
39. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41-55. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1488
40. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2005a). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 263- 275. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.263
41. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2005b). The influence of approach and avoidance cues on attentional flexibility. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 69-81. doi:10.1007/s11031-005-7954-4
42. Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999, September 3). Creative sparks. Science, 285, 1495-1496. doi:10.1126/science.285.5433.1495
43. Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63-76.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.63
44. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
45. Harkins, S. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436-455. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.436
46. Haselton, M. G., & Miller, G. R. (2006). Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17, 50-73. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0
47. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
48. Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood- cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.214
49. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
50. Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 3-13. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.3
51. Koch, S., Holland, R. W., Hengstler, M., & van Knippenberg, A. (2009). Body locomotion as regulatory process: Stepping backward enhances cognitive control. Psychological Science, 20, 549-550. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2009.02342.x
52. Koch, S., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions. Cognition, 109, 133-142. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.014
53. Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2008). Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un) accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 183-195. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.183
54. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210-216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x
55. Liberman, N., Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2007). Completed vs. interrupted priming: Reduced accessibility from post-fulfillment inhibition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 258-264. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2006.01.006
56. McFall, S. R., Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2009). Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 135-154. doi:10.1037/a0012878
57. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
58. Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. (2009, February 5). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323, 1226-1229.doi:10.1126/science.1169144
59. Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2007). The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 876-891. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876
60. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34-77. doi:10.1080/10463281003765323
62. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00040-4
63. Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36, 641- 652. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.01.007
64. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
65. Peterson, D. J., & Mulligan, N. W. (2010). Enactment and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 38, 233-243. doi:10.3758/MC.38.2.233
66. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
67. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
68. Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influenceof fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855-866. doi:10.1177/0146167207301017
69. Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45-48. doi:10.1037/h0031355
70. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657- 687. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
71. Sagiv, L., Arieli, S., Goldenberg, J., & Goldschmidt, A. (2009). Structure and freedom in creativity: The interplay between externally imposedstructure and personal cognitive style. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1086-1110. doi:10.1002/job.664
72. Scholer, A. A., Zou, X., Fujita, K., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 215-231. doi:10.1037/a0019715
73. Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, M. Steven, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97-133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.36
75. Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 164-168. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9001-5
76. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66
77. Sligte, D. J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 891-897. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.009
78. Smith, R. W., & Kounios, J. (1996). Sudden insight: All-or-none processing revealed by speed-accuracy decomposition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1443-1462. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1443
79. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability-and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261-288. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00100-3
81. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptation and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375-424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z
82. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.
83. Van Dillen, L. F., & Koole, S. L. (2007). Clearing the mind: A working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion, 7, 715-723. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.715
84. Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1042-1048. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-X
85. Walczyk, J. J., Runco, M. A., Tripp, S. M., & Smith, C. E. (2008). The creativity of lying: Divergent thinking and ideational correlates of the resolution of social dilemmas. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 328- 342. doi:10.1080/10400410802355152
86. Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 1-9. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_1
87. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.