Insights from in situ analysis of TCR-pMHC recognition: Response of an interaction network

Immunological Reviews

Volumn 251, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-64

  Zhu, Cheng ^a,b   Jiang, Ning ^c   Huang, Jun ^d   Zarnitsyna, Veronika I ^a   Evavold, Brian D ^e  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell activation; Interaction network; T cells; T cell receptors; Two dimensional affinity and kinetics

Indexed keywords

CD8 ANTIGEN; HETERODIMER; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE 1; LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; PADGEM PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR;

ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELL; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; ANTIGEN SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CELLULAR IMMUNITY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HUMAN; LIPID BILAYER; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; THERMODYNAMICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, CELLULAR; LIPID BILAYERS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTOR CROSS-TALK; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

EID: 84871447669     PISSN: 01052896     EISSN: 1600065X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12016     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adams JJ, et al. T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. Immunity 2011;35:681-693.
2. Hahn M, Nicholson MJ, Pyrdol J, Wucherpfennig KW. Unconventional topology of self peptide-major histocompatibility complex binding by a human autoimmune T cell receptor. Nat Immunol 2005;6:490-496.
3. Garcia KC, Adams JJ, Feng D, Ely LK. The molecular basis of TCR germline bias for MHC is surprisingly simple. Nat Immunol 2009;10:143-147.
4. Marrack P, Scott-Browne JP, Dai S, Gapin L, Kappler JW. Evolutionarily conserved amino acids that control TCR-MHC interaction. Annu Rev Immunol 2008;26:171-203.
5. Wucherpfennig KW, Call MJ, Deng L, Mariuzza R. Structural alterations in peptide-MHC recognition by self-reactive T cell receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 2009;21:590-595.
6. Krogsgaard M, et al. Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. Mol Cell 2003;12:1367-1378.
7. Qi S, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM, Chakraborty AK. Molecular flexibility can influence the stimulatory ability of receptor-ligand interactions at cell-cell junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:4416-4421.
8. Willcox BE, et al. TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. Immunity 1999;10:357-365.
9. Puech PH, Nevoltris D, Robert P, Limozin L, Boyer C, Bongrand P. Force measurements of TCR/pMHC recognition at T cell surface. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e22344.
10. Kersh GJ, Kersh EN, Fremont DH, Allen PM. High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity 1998;9:817-826.
11. Matsui K, Boniface JJ, Steffner P, Reay PA, Davis MM. Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:12862-12866.
12. Corr M, et al. T cell receptor-MHC class I peptide interactions: affinity, kinetics, and specificity. Science 1994;265:946-949.
13. Lyons DS, et al. A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. Immunity 1996;5:53-61.
14. Holler PD, Kranz DM. Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. Immunity 2003;18:255-264.
15. Alam SM, et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 1996;381:616-620.
16. Rosette C, et al. The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. Immunity 2001;15:59-70.
17. Khilko SN, Jelonek MT, Corr M, Boyd LF, Bothwell AL, Margulies DH. Measuring interactions of MHC class I molecules using surface plasmon resonance. J Immunol Methods 1995;183:77-94.
18. Al-Ramadi BK, Jelonek MT, Boyd LF, Margulies DH, Bothwell AL. Lack of strict correlation of functional sensitization with the apparent affinity of MHC/peptide complexes for the TCR. J Immunol 1995;155:662-673.
19. Baker BM, Gagnon SJ, Biddison WE, Wiley DC. Conversion of a T cell antagonist into an agonist by repairing a defect in the TCR/peptide/MHC interface: implications for TCR signaling. Immunity 2000;13:475-484.
20. Sykulev Y, Vugmeyster Y, Brunmark A, Ploegh HL, Eisen HN. Peptide antagonism and T cell receptor interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity 1998;9:475-483.
21. Huppa JB, et al. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010;463:963-967.
22. Huang J, et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 2010;464:932-936.
23. Jiang N, et al. Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. Immunity 2011;34:13-23.
24. + T cell responses. J Exp Med 2011;208:81-90.
25. Edwards LJ, Zarnitsyna VI, Hood JD, Evavold BD, Zhu C. Insights into T cell recognition of antigen: significance of two dimensional kinetic parameters. Front Cell Biol 2012;3:86.
26. Zarnitsyna VI, Zhu C. T cell triggering: insights from 2D kinetics analysis of molecular interactions. Phys Biol 2012;9:045005.
27. Huang J, Meyer C, Zhu C. T cell antigen recognition at the cell membrane. Mol Immunol 2012;52:155-164.
28. Kuhns MS, Davis MM. TCR signaling emerges from the sum of many parts. Front Immunol 2012;3:159.
29. Robert P, Aleksic M, Dushek O, Cerundolo V, Bongrand P, van der Merwe A. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys J 2012;102:248-257.
30. Chesla SE, Selvaraj P, Zhu C. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys J 1998;75:1553-1572.
31. Evans E, Ritchie K, Merkel R. Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys J 1995;68:2580-2587.
32. Chen W, Zarnitsyna VI, Sarangapani KK, Huang J, Zhu C. Measuring receptor-ligand binding kinetics on cell surfaces: from adhesion frequency to thermal fluctuation methods. Cell Mol Bioeng 2008;1:276-288.
33. Chen W, Evans EA, McEver RP, Zhu C. Monitoring receptor-ligand interactions between surfaces by thermal fluctuations. Biophys J 2008;94:694-701.
34. Yago T, Zarnitsyna VI, Klopocki AG, McEver RP, Zhu C. Transport governs flow-enhanced cell tethering through L-selectin at threshold shear. Biophys J 2007;92:330-342.
35. Dustin ML, Ferguson LM, Chan PY, Springer TA, Golan DE. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J Cell Biol 1996;132:465-474.
36. Dustin ML, et al. Low affinity interaction of human or rat T cell adhesion molecule CD2 with its ligand aligns adhering membranes to achieve high physiological affinity. J Biol Chem 1997;272:30889-30898.
37. Grakoui A, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999;285:221-227.
38. Tolentino TP, Wu J, Zarnitsyna VI, Fang Y, Dustin ML, Zhu C. Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP. Biophys J 2008;95:920-930.
39. Wu J, Fang Y, Zarnitsyna VI, Tolentino TP, Dustin ML, Zhu C. A coupled diffusion-kinetics model for analysis of contact-area FRAP experiment. Biophys J 2008;95:910-919.
40. Zhu DM, Dustin ML, Cairo CW, Golan DE. Analysis of two-dimensional dissociation constant of laterally mobile cell adhesion molecules. Biophys J 2007;92:1022-1034.
41. Chen W, Lou J, Zhu C. Forcing switch from short- to intermediate- and long-lived states of the alphaA domain generates LFA-1/ICAM-1 catch bonds. J Biol Chem 2010;285:35967-35978.
42. Aleksic M, et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor-peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 2010;32:163-174.
43. Mehta P, Cummings RD, McEver RP. Affinity and kinetic analysis of P-selectin binding to P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1. J Biol Chem 1998;273:32506-32513.
44. Shimaoka M, et al. Reversibly locking a protein fold in an active conformation with a disulfide bond: integrin alpha L I domains with high affinity and antagonist activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:6009-6014.
45. Klopocki AG, et al. Replacing a lectin domain residue in L-selectin enhances binding to P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 but not to 6-sulfo-sialyl Lewis x. J Biol Chem 2008;283:11493-11500.
46. Dustin ML, Bromley SK, Davis MM, Zhu C. Identification of self through two-dimensional chemistry and synapses. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2001;17:133-157.
47. Davis MM, et al. Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 1998;16:523-544.
48. Gascoigne NR, Zal T, Alam SM. T-cell receptor binding kinetics in T-cell development and activation. Expert Rev Mol Med 2001;2001:1-17.
49. Stone JD, Chervin AS, Kranz DM. T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology 2009;126:165-176.
50. McKeithan TW. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:5042-5046.
51. Rabinowitz JD, Beeson C, Lyons DS, Davis MM, McConnell HM. Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:1401-1405.
52. Bell GI. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells Science 1978;200:618-627.
53. Judokusumo E, Tabdanov E, Kumari S, Dustin ML, Kam LC. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys J 2012;102:L5-L7.
54. Kim ST, et al. TCR mechanobiology: torques and tunable structures linked to early T cell signaling. Front Immunol 2012;3:76.
55. Kim ST, et al. The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J Biol Chem 2009;284:31028-31037.
56. Li YC, et al. Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. J Immunol 2010;184:5959-5963.
57. Lim TS, Mortellaro A, Lim CT, Hammerling GJ, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Mechanical interactions between dendritic cells and T cells correlate with T cell responsiveness. J Immunol 2011;187:258-265.
58. Ma Z, Finkel TH. T cell receptor triggering by force. Trends Immunol 2010;31:1-6.
59. Ma Z, Janmey PA, Finkel TH. The receptor deformation model of TCR triggering. FASEB J 2008;22:1002-1008.
60. Ma Z, Sharp KA, Janmey PA, Finkel TH. Surface-anchored monomeric agonist pMHCs alone trigger TCR with high sensitivity. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e43.
61. Bell GI, Dembo M, Bongrand P. Cell adhesion. Competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding. Biophys J 1984;45:1051-1064.
62. Huang J, Edwards LJ, Evavold BD, Zhu C. Kinetics of MHC-CD8 interaction at the T cell membrane. J Immunol 2007;179:7653-7662.
63. Garcia KC, et al. CD8 enhances formation of stable T-cell receptor/MHC class I molecule complexes. Nature 1996;384:577-581.
64. Wyer JR, et al. T cell receptor and coreceptor CD8 alphaalpha bind peptide-MHC independently and with distinct kinetics. Immunity 1999;10:219-225.
65. Dustin ML, Springer TA. T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1. Nature 1989;341:619-624.
66. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 2005;202:1031-1036.
67. Schamel WW, et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med 2005;202:493-503.
68. Yokosuka T, et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 2005;6:1253-1262.
69. Lillemeier BF, Mortelmaier MA, Forstner MB, Huppa JB, Groves JT, Davis MM. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat Immunol 2010;11:90-96.
70. Wu Y, Vendome J, Shapiro L, Ben-Shaul A, Honig B. Transforming binding affinities from three dimensions to two with application to cadherin clustering. Nature 2011;475:510-513.
71. Xu C, et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 2008;135:702-713.
72. Chesla SE, Li P, Nagarajan S, Selvaraj P, Zhu C. The membrane anchor influences ligand binding two-dimensional kinetic rates and three-dimensional affinity of FcgammaRIII (CD16). J Biol Chem 2000;275:10235-10246.
73. Bromley SK, et al. The immunological synapse and CD28-CD80 interactions. Nat Immunol 2001;2:1159-1166.
74. Dustin ML, et al. Quantification and modeling of tripartite CD2-, CD58FC chimera (alefacept)-, and CD16-mediated cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2007;282:34748-34757.