Design-oriented pedagogy for technology-enhanced learning to cross over the borders between formal and informal environments

Journal of Universal Computer Science

Volumn 18, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 2097-2119

  Vartiainen, Henriikka ^a   Liljeström, Anu ^a   Enkenberg, Jorma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Design oriented pedagogy; Learning by collaborative designing; Learning object; Pedagogical model; Project based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871313803     PISSN: 0948695X     EISSN: 09486968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Appleton, J., Christenson, S. & Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 396-386.
2. Balsamo, A. (2010). Design. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 1-10.
3. Bandura A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
4. Banks, J.A., Au, K.H., Ball, A.F., Bell, P., Gordon, E.W., Gutierrez, K.D., Heath, S.B., Lee, C.D., Lee, Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N.S., Valdes, G. & Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Report from the LIFE Center (The Learning in Informal and Formal Learning Environments Center and the Center for Multicultural Education), University of Washington, Stanford University and SRI International.
5. Bielaczyc, K. & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-292). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M. & Rumble, M. (2011). Defining 21st century skills. In Griffin, P., McGaw, B. & Care, E. (Eds.) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp.17-66), New York: Springer.
7. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
8. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
9. Churchill, D. (2005). Learning object: An interactive representation and a mediating tool in a learning activity. Educational Media International, 42(4), 333-349.
10. Churchill, D. (2008). Towards useful classification of learning objects. Education Technology Research & Development, 55(5), 479-497.
11. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
12. Cocharane, T. (2005). Interactive quicktime. Developing and evaluating multimedia learning objects to enhance both face-to-face and distance e-learning environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1(1), 33-54.
13. Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
14. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Designbased research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
15. Edelson, D. & Reiser, B. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners. In K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335-354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5-6), 495-506.
17. Fischer, G. & Redmiles, D. (2008). Transdisciplinary education and collaboration. Meeting of the Human Computer Interaction Consortium (HCIC) February 2008. Frasier, CO.
18. Forman, E. & Sink, W. (2006). Sociocultural approaches to learning science in classrooms. Final Draft of a Report to the National Research Council Committee on Science Learning K-8. University of Pittsburgh 1/16/2006. Retrieved October, 2011 from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Forman_Commissioned_Paper.pdf
19. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
20. Harel, I. & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as a learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 41-84). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
21. Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K. & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P (in press). Socio-cultural perspectives on collaborative learning: Towards collaborative knowledge creation. A draft of a book chapter submitted to be published in C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O'Donnell, C. Chan & C. Chinn (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. Retrieved 6th Desember, 2012, from http://utu.academia.edu/KaiHakkarainen/Papers/316810/Draft_of_Hakkarainen_K._Paavola_S._Kangas_K._and_Seitamaa-Hakkarainen_P_submitted_Sociocultural_perspectives_on_collaborative_learning_Towards_collaborative_knowledge_creation
22. Hennessy, S. & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1-36.
23. Herrington, J., Oliver, R. & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59-71.
24. st century. Chicago: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved 3th Desember, 2012, from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2713.
25. Jonassen, D. (2000). Learning: as activity. The meaning of learning project. Learning development institute. Retrieved 25th January, 2011, from http://www.learndev.org/.
26. Jonassen, D & Churchill, D. (2004). Is there learning orientation in learning objects? International Journal of E-Learning (April-May) 32-42.
27. Johnson, R. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), 14-26.
28. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. & Hakkarainen K. (2011). Design expert's participation in elementary students' collaborative design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (11 May 2011), pp.1-18.
29. Kirschner, P. A, Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
30. th February, 2009, from http://www.well.com/~art/PDF%20Files/s%Bb42002cm.pdf.
31. Kodoner, J. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lesson learned from an inquiry in science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 1-31.
32. Krajcik, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317-333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lehtinen, E. (2003). Computer supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle & J. Van Merriëboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 35-53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J. & Pöllänen, S. (in press). Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Online First June 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11422-012-9416-0
35. Marsden, P. V. (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
36. National Education Technology Plan. (2010). Learning powered by technology. Retrieved 7th November, 2011, from www.ed.cov/technology/netp-2010.
37. Paavola, S., Engeström, R. & Hakkarainen, K. (in press). Trialogical approach as a new form of mediation. In A. Morsh, A. Moen & S. Paavola (Eds.), Collaborative knowledge creation: Practices, tools, and concepts (pp. 9-23).
38. Phelps, E. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27-53.
39. Perkins, D. N. (2009). Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning and Leading with Technology (December 2007), 18-22.
41. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. Roth, W.-M. & Lee, Y. J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232.
43. Sandoval, W. A. & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
44. Salomon, G. (1997). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R. & Quellmalz, E. (2011). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In Griffin, P., McGaw, B. & Care, E. (Eds.) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp.231-300), New York: Springer.'
46. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M. & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative design: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 109-136.
47. Thomas, D. & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
48. Vartiainen, H. & Enkenberg, J. (2011). Enlargement of Educational Innovation: An Instructional Model of the Case Forest Pedagogy. Proceedings of the 4th International Network-Based Education 2011 Conference The Social Media in the Middle of Nowhere. University of Lapland Publications in Education 25, pp. 76-86.
49. Vartiainen, H., Enkenberg, J. & Liljeström, A. (2009). Oppimisen kokeminen ja sitoutuminen oppimisaihioiden ja tutkimusprosessin suunnittelua painottavissa oppimisprojekteissa. Interaktiivinen tekniikka koulutuksessa 2009 -konferenssin tutkijatapaamisen artikkelit. Tampere University Press, Interaktiivisen median tutkimuksia - Research of Interactive Media 2, pp. 46-57.
50. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51. Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 597-621.
52. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved 15th August, 2011, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.
54. Wiley, D. & Edwards, E. (2002). Online self-organizing social systems: The decentralized future of online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(1), 33-46.
55. Zhang, J. (2010). Technology supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 229-243.