The trialogical approach as a new form of mediation

Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Practices, Tools, Concepts

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-14

  Paavola, Sami ^a   Engeström, Ritva ^a   Hakkarainen, Kai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879517047     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-004-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Béguin, P. & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173-190.
2. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73-85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bodker, S. & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353-402.
5. Brockmeier, J. & Olson, D. R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6. Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Engeström, R (2009). Who is acting in an Activity System? In A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. Gutiérrez (Eds.) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
9. Enyedy, N. & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(4), 413-439.
10. Ewenstein, B. & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as 'epistemic objects'. Organization Studies 30(01), 7-30.
11. Hakkarainen, K. (2006). Scientific challenges of KP-Lab. Working papers of the KP-Lab.
12. Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Features of trialogical learning: An introduction of research and development of Knowledge-Practices Laboratory. Working papers of the KP-Lab.
13. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using a design principles database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(2), 187-201.
15. Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects. Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society 14(4), 1-30.
16. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In Schatzki T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. & von Savigny E. (eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. pp. 175-188. London and NY: Routledge.
17. KP-Lab (2007). Description of Work 2.1 Months 13-30, Part A. A project report, Developing Knowledge Practices Laboratory (project no.: KP-Lab; 027490).
18. Lakkala, M., Paavola, S., Kosonen, K., Muukkonen, H., Bauters, M., & Markkanen, H. (2009). Main functionalities of the Knowledge Practices Environment (KPE) affording knowledge creation practices in education. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 297-306). Rhodes, Creek: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
19. Lorino, P., Tricard, B. & Clot, Y. (2011). Research Methods for Non-Representational Approaches to Organizational Complexity: The Dialogical Mediated Inquiry. Organization Studies, 32(6), 769-801.
20. Markkanen, H., Holi, M., Benmergui, L., Bauters, M., & Richter, C. (2008). The Knowledge Practices Environment: a Virtual Environment for Collaborative Knowledge Creation and Work around Shared Artefacts. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 5035-5040). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
21. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The Three P's of Pedagogy for the Networked Society: Personalization, Participation, and Productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20(1), 10-27.
22. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24. Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts: A trialogical approach to CSCL. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 83-92). Rhodes, Creek: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
25. Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K. & Karlgren, K. (2011). The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. Research in Learning Technology 19(3), 233-246.
26. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological Foundations for CSCL: A Comparison of Three Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 24-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning. Review of Educational Research 74(4), 557-576.
28. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-6, Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., eds.; vols. 7-8, Burks, A. W., ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. [marked as: CP volume.paragraph].
29. Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665-691.
30. Rheinberger, H.J. (1997) Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Scardamalia, M. (2002) Collective Cognitive Responsibility for the Advancement of Knowledge. In B. Smith (ed.). Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67-98). Open Court, Chicago.
32. Schmidt, K. & Wagner, I. (2002). Coordinative Artifacts in Architectural Practice. In Blay-Fornarino et al. (Eds.): Cooperative Systems Design: A Challenge of the Mobility Age (pp. 257-274). [Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP 2002), Saint Raphaël, France, 4-7 June 2002], IOS Press, Amsterdam etc., 2002.
33. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27, 4-13.
34. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Suchman, L. (1994). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer-Supported Cooperation Work 2, 21-39.
36. Tynjälä, P. & Häkkinen, P. (2005). E-learning at work: Theoretical underpinnings and pedagogical challenges. The Journal of Workplace Learning 17(5/6), 318-336.
37. Van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledgecreation discourses. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4, 259-287.
38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.