The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 250, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1851-1861

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b   Demirel, Shaban ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; Glaucoma; Perimetry; Simulation; Structure function relationship; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUP VOLUME; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLAUCOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIM AREA; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEST VARIABILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84871287606     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: 1435702X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2005-9     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson D, Patella V (1999) Automated static perimetry. Mosby, St. Louis
2. Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G (2005) Assessment of visual fieldsshields' textbook of glaucoma. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 116- 142
3. Artes P, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan B (2002) Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2654-2659
4. Kass MA, Gordon MO, Gao F, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JK, Miller JP, Parrish RK, Wilson MR, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study G (2010) Delaying treatment of ocular hypertension: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 128:276-287. doi:10.1001/ archophthalmol.2010.20
5. Chen P, Cady R, Mudumbai R, Ngan R (2010) Continued visual field progression in eyes with prior visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 19:598-603
6. Gardiner S, Demirel S, Johnson C (2011) Perimetric indices as predictors of future glaucomatous functional change. Optom Vis Sci 88:56-62
7. Henson D, Chaudry S, Artes P, Faragher E, Ansons A (2000) Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:417-421
8. Hood D, Anderson S, Wall M, Kardon R (2007) Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3662-3668. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1401
9. Garway-Heath D, Caprioli J, Fitzke F, Hitchings R (2000) Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1774-1782
10. Gardiner S, Demirel S (2008) Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 115:2127-2131
11. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA (2005) Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3712-3717
12. Johnson C, Cioffi G, Liebmann J, Sample P, Zangwill L, Weinreb R (2000) The relationship between structural and functional alterations in glaucoma: a review. Semin Ophthalmol 15:221-233
13. Garway-Heath D, Holder G, Fitzke F, Hitchings R (2002) Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2213-2220
14. Xin D, Greenstein VC, Ritch R, Liebmann JM, De Moraes CGV, Hood DC (2011) A comparison of functional and structuralmeasures for identifying progression of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(1):519-526. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5174
15. Artes P, Chauhan B (2005) Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 24:333-354
16. Jampel HD, Vitale S, Ding Y, Quigley H, Friedman D, Congdon N, Zeimer R (2006) Test-retest variability in structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage in the glaucoma imaging longitudinal study. J Glaucoma 15:152-157
17. Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Hoffmann EM, Zangwill LM (2006) Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113:1593-1602
18. Weinreb R, Kaufman P (2009) The glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future: a report from the NEI/FDA CDER glaucoma clinical trial design and endpoints symposium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1497-1505. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2843
19. Crabb DP, Owen VMF, Garway-Heath DF (2007) Poor agreement between current tests of structural and functional progression in glaucoma can be explained by measurement noise (E-abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1615
20. Vesti E, Spry P, Chauhan B, Johnson C (2002) Sensitivity differences between real-patient and computer-simulated visual fields. J Glaucoma 11:35-45
21. Gordon M, Beiser J, Brandt J, Heuer D, Higginbotham E, Johnson C, Keltner J, Miller J, Parrish R II, Wilson M, Kass M, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:714-720. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
22. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E, Group EMGT (2003) Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121:48-56. doi:10.1001/archopht. 121.1.48
23. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, Morbio R, Varotto A (2000) Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 107:1287-1293
24. Drance S, Anderson DR, Schulzer M (2001) Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 131:699-708
25. Chopra V, Varma R, Francis BA, Wu J, Torres M, Azen SP (2008) Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the risk of open-angle glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 115:227-232.e221
26. Broadway DC, Drance SM (1998) Glaucoma and vasospasm. Br J Ophthalmol 82:862-870. doi:10.1136/bjo.82.8.862
27. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Wu S-Y, Hyman LG, Schachat AP, Barbados Eye Study G (1995) Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma: The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 113:918-924. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070092031
28. Spry P, Johnson C, Mansberger S, Cioffi G (2005) Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma 14:11-18
29. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H (1997) A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol 75:368-375
30. Fingeret M, Flanagan JG, Liebmann JM (2005) The essential HRT primer. Jocoto Advertising, Inc, San Ramon
31. Hood D, Kardon R (2007) A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 26:688-710
32. Hot A, Dul M, Swanson W(2008) Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:3049-3057. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1205
33. Deming W (1943) Statistical adjustment of data. Wiley, New York
34. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, Quigley HA, Budenz DL, Parrish RK, Kass MA, Gordon MO (2006) The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 113:1603-1612
35. DeLeon Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Kakati B, McGwin G, Monheit BE, Arthur SN, Girkin CA (2007) Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1156-1163. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0921
36. Zhu H, Crabb DP, Schlottmann PG, Lemij H, Reus NJ, Healey PR, Mitchell P, Ho T, Garway-Heath DF (2010) Predicting visual function from the measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(11):5657-5666. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5239
37. Gardiner S, Swanson W, Demirel S, McKendrick A, Turpin A, Johnson C (2008) A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry. Vis Res 48:1859-1869
38. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH (2009) A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure-function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:4254-4266. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2697
39. Harwerth R, Vilupuru A, Rangaswamy N, Smith E III (2007) The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:763-773
40. Quigley H, Dunkelberger G, Green W (1987) Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 107:453-464
41. Harwerth R, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith E, Crawford M (1999) Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2242-2250
42. Harwerth R, Crawford M, Frishman L, Viswanathan S, Smith E, Carter-Dawson L (2002) Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:91-125
43. Harwerth R, Quigley H (2006) Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 124:853-859. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.6.853
44. Harwerth RS, Wheat JL, Fredette MJ, Anderson DR (2010) Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Prog Ret Eye Res 29:249-271
45. SwansonW, Felius J, Pan F (2004) Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:466-472
46. Strouthidis N, Scott A, Peter N, Garway-Heath D (2006) Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2904-2910. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1584
47. Hudson CJW, Kim LS, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA, Wild JM (2007) Some dissociating factors in the analysis of structural and functional progressive damage in open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 91:624-628. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005. 087213
48. Heijl A, Leske M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268-1279
49. Gardiner S, Crabb D, Fitzke F, Hitchings R (2004) Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter. Vision Res 44:839-848
50. Strouthidis N, Scott A, Viswanathan A, Crabb D, Garway-Heath D (2007) Monitoring glaucomatous visual field progression: the effect of a novel spatial filter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:251- 257. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0576
51. Morales J, Weitzman M, Gonzalez de la Rosa M (2000) Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 107:134-142
52. Garway-Heath D, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke F, Hitchings R (2000) Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 107:1809-1815
53. Strouthidis N, Vinciotti V, Tucker A, Gardiner S, Crabb D, Garway-Heath D (2006) Structure and function in glaucoma; the relationship between a functional visual field map and an anatomical retinal map. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5356-5362
54. Bowd C, Zangwill L, Medeiros F, Tavares I, Hoffmann E, Bourne R, Sample P, Weinreb R (2006) Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2889-2895. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1489
55. Yang H, Downs JC, Girkin C, Sakata L, Bellezza A, Thompson H, Burgoyne CF (2007) 3-D Histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: lamina cribrosa and peripapillary scleral position and thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4597-4607. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0349
56. Weber A, Harman C (2005) Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3197-3207
57. Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood D, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger S, Cioffi G, Johnson C (2007) Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1173-1180. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0561
58. Harwerth R, Wheat J, Rangaswamy N (2008) Age-related losses of retinal ganglion cells and axons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4437-4443. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1753