Structure versus function in glaucoma: An application of a linear model

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 3662-3668

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Anderson, Susan C ^b   Wall, Michael ^b   Kardon, Randy H ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE FIBER; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL FIELD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DISEASE COURSE; MIDDLE AGED; MYELINATED NERVE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NERVE FIBERS, MYELINATED; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34648831745     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-1401     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. The multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.
2. Garway-Heath DF. Comparison of structural and functional methods. In: Weinreb RN, Greve EL, eds. Glaucoma Diagnosis. Structure and Function. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications: 2004:135-143.
3. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2889-2895.
4. Hood DC. Relating retinal nerve fiber thickness to behavioral sensitivity in patients with glaucoma: the application of a linear model. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007;24:1426-1430.
5. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence for a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1672-1681.
6. Zangwill LM, Williams J, Berry CC, Knauer S, Weinreb RN. A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1309-1315.
7. El Beltagi TA, Bowd C, Boden C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography is related to visual function in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2185-2191.
8. Kanamori A, Nakamira M, Escano MFT, Seya R, Maeda H, Negi A. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:513-520.
9. Leung CK, Yung WH, Ng AC, Woo J, Tsang MK, Tse KK. Evaluation of scanning resolution on retinal nerve fiber layer measurement using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:479-485.
10. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, Dada T, Singh R. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2006-2010.
11. Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:115-137.
12. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809-1815.
13. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL 3rd, Crawford ML. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2242-2250.
14. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL 3rd, Barnes G, Holt WF, Crawford ML. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3152-3160.
15. Harwerth RS, Quigley HA. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:853-859.
16. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-363.
17. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
18. Garway-Heath DF, Viswanathan A, Westcott M, Kamal D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between perimetric light sensitivity and optic disc neuroretinal rim area. In: Wall M Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1999;381-389.
19. Swanson WH, Felius J, Pan F. Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: Interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:466-472.
20. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:648-656.