Some dissociating factors in the analysis of structural and functional progressive damage in open-angle glaucoma

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 624-628

  Hudson, C J W ^a   Kim, L S ^b   Hancock, S A ^c   Cunliffe, I A ^c   Wild, J M ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c BIRMINGHAM HEARTLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; EYE EXAMINATION; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34248153134     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.087213     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:135-46.
2. Caprioli J. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:235-9.
3. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereo photograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2255-62.
4. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2006-10.
5. Saito H, Tomidokoro A, Sugimoto E, et al. Optic disc topography and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1340-4.
6. Cvenkel B. Retinal thickness at the posterior pole in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:920-5.
7. The AGIS Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
8. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology 1999;106:391-5.
9. Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A, et al. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:184-8.
10. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:573-83.
11. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:286-93.
12. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24:333-54.
13. Chauhon BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, et al. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1492-9.
14. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6.
15. Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Werner EB. Clinical evaluation of the optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer. In: Ritch R, Shields B, Krupin T, eds. The glaucomas basic sciences. 2nd edn. St Louis, Ml: Mosby-Year Book, 1996.
16. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. The asymptomatic patient with elevated pressure. In: Craven L, eds. Clinical decisions in Glaucoma. St Louis, Ml: Mosby-Year Book, 1993.
17. lester M, Mickelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology 1997;104:545-8.
18. Zangwill L, Irak I, Berry CC, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:983-90.
19. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2889-95.
20. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fifzke FW, et al. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1809-15.
21. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL III, et al. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3152-60.
22. Kim SH, Park KH. The relationship between recurrent optic disc hemorrhage and glaucoma progression. Ophthalmology 2006;113:598- 602.
23. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:714-20.
24. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaram M, et al. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005;14:337-43.
25. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanantion tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:85-7.