Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 839-848

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Crabb, David P ^a   Fitzke, Fred W ^b   Hitchings, Roger A ^c  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Optic nerve head; Perimetry; Statistics; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FILTER; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; NOISE REDUCTION; OPTIC NERVE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 1142297498     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00474-7     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson D.R., Patella V.M. Automated static perimetry. 2nd ed. 1999;Mosby, St. Louis, MO. pp. 147-159.
2. Artes P.H., Iwase A., Ohno Y., Kitazawa Y., Chauhan B.C. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43:2002;2654-2659.
3. Bengtsson B., Olsson J., Heijl A., Rootzén H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry SITA. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 75:1997;368-375.
4. Budenz D.L. Atlas of visual fields. 1997;Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 146-155.
5. Chauhan B.C., House P.H. Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology. 98:1991;79-83.
6. Chauhan B.C., Johnson C.A. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 40:1999;648-656.
7. Crabb D.P., Edgar D.F., Fitzke F.W., McNaught A.I., Wynn H.P. New approach to estimating the variability in visual field data using an image processing technique. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 79:1995;213-217.
8. Crabb D.P., Fitzke F.W., McNaught A.I., Edgar D.F., Hitchings R.A. Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;517-524.
9. Fitzke F.W., Crabb D.P., McNaught A.I., Edgar D.F., Hitchings R.A. Image processing of computerised visual field data. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 79:1995;207-212.
10. Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A., Poinoosawmy D.P., McNaught A.I., Crabb D.P. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 80:1996;40-48.
11. Flammer J., Drance S.M., Zulauf M. Differential light threshold: short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology. 102:1984;704-706.
12. Gardiner S.K., Crabb D.P. Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 86:2002;560-564.
13. Gardiner S.K., Crabb D.P. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43:2002;1400-1407.
14. Garway-Heath D.F., Poinoosawmy D., Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;1809-1815.
15. Glass E., Schaumberger M., Lachenmayr B.J. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full threshold strategy of the Humphrey field analyser. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36:1995;1847-1854.
16. Heijl A., Lindgren G., Lindgren A., Olsson J., Asman P., Myers S., Patella M. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: Statpac 2. Mills R.P., Heijl A. Perimetry update 1990/1991. 1991;303-315 Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam.
17. Heijl A., Lindgren G., Olsson J. Test retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 108:1989;130-135.
18. Henson D.B., Chaundry S., Artes P.H., Faragher E.B., Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41:2000;417-421.
19. Johnson C.A., Chauhan B.C., Shapiro L.R. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 33:1992;2966-2974.
20. Katz J., Gilbert D., Quigley H.A., Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;1017-1025.
21. Lachenmayr B.J., Vivell P.M.O. Perimetry and its clinical correlations. 1993;Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.
22. Membrey W.L., Bunce C., Poinoosawmy D.P., Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A. Glaucoma surgery with or without adjunctive antiproliferatives in normal tension glaucoma: 2. Visual field progression. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 85:2001;696-701.
23. Nouri-Mahdavi K., Brigatti L., Weitzman M., Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;1228-1236.
24. Sakai T., Kuniyoshi S., Tsuzuki K., Makoto U., Kawamura Y. Temporal raphe of the retinal nerve fiber layer revealed by medullated fibers. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. 31:1987;655-658.
25. Smith S.D., Katz J., Quigley H.A. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;1419-1428.
26. Spenceley S.E., Henson D.B. Visual field test simulation and error in threshold estimation. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 80:1996;304-308.
27. Spry P.G.D., Bates A.B., Johnson C.A., Chauhan B.C. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41:2000;2192-2200.
28. Spry P.G.D., Johnson C.A. Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Survey of Ophthalmology. 47:2002;158-173.
29. Spry P.G.D., Johnson C.A., Bates A.B., Turpin A., Chauhan B.C. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Archives of Ophthalmology. 120:2002;173-180.
30. Vesti E., Spry P.G.D., Chauhan B.C., Johnson C.A. Sensitivity differences between real-patient and computer-simulated visual fields. Journal of Glaucoma. 11:2002;35-45.
31. Viswanathan A.C., McNaught A.I., Poinoosawmy D., Fontana L., Crabb D., Fitzke F., Hitchings R. Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Archives of Ophthalmology. 117:1999;450-454.
32. Vrabec F. The temporal raphe of the human retina. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 62:1966;926-938.
33. Wild J.M., Hutchings N., Hussey M.K., Flanagan J.G., Trope G.E. Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;808-815.
34. Wild J.M., Pacey I.E., O'Neill E.C., Cunliffe I.A. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 40:1999;1998-2009.
35. Wild J.M., Searle A.E.T., Dengler-Harles M., O'Neill E.C. Long-term follow-up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 69:1991;210-216.