A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 368-375

  Bengtsson, Boel ^a   Olsson, Jonny ^b   Heijl, Anders ^a   Rootzén, Holger ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Glaucoma; Threshold computerized perimetry; Visual field testing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRONEUROLOGY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

EID: 0030817329     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00392.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bebié H, Fankhauser F & Spahr J (1976): Static perimetry: strategies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 54: 325-338.
2. Bengtsson B, Heijl A & Olsson J (1997): Evaluation of a new interactive threshold strategy in normal subject. In: Wall & Heijl (eds). Perimetry Update, Proceedings of the 12th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1996, Kugler, Amsterdam (in press).
3. de Boer RW, van den Berg TJ & Greve EL (1982): Concepts for automatic perimetry, as applied to the Scoperimeter, an experimental automatic perimeter. Int Ophthalmol 5: 181-191.
4. Chaplin GBB, Edwards JH, Gedye JL & Marlows S (1973): Automated system for testing visual fields. Proc. IIE 120: 1321-1327.
5. Cornsweet TN (1962): The staircase method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol 75: 485-491.
6. Fankhauser F, Koch P & Roulier A (1972): On automation of perimetry. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 184: 126-150.
7. Fankhauser F. Spahr J & Bebié H (1977): Some aspects of the automation of perimetry. Surv Ophthalmol 22: 131-141.
8. Flammer J, Drance SM & Schultzer M (1984): Covariates of long-term fluctuation of differential threshold. Arch Ophthalmol 102: 880-882.
9. Flanagan JG, Wild JM & Trope GE (1993): Evaluation of Fastpac, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 100: 949-954.
10. Glass E, Schaumberger M & Lachenmayr BJ (1995): Simulations for Fastpac and the standard 4-2 dB Full-Threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 1847-2105.
11. Green DM (1993): A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yesno task. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 2096-2105.
12. Haley MJ (1986): The Field Analyzer primer. Allergan Humphrey, San Leandro, CA.
13. Heijl A (1977): Computer test logics for automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55: 15-31.
14. Heijl A (1985): The Humphrey Field Analyzer, construction and concepts. In: Heijl & Greve (eds). Documenta Ophthalmol. Proc. series 42: 77-84. Proceedings of the 6th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1984. Junk Publishers. Dordrecht.
15. Heijl A (1995): Improved test algorithms for automated perimetry. In: Kriegelstaien (ed). Glaucoma Update V: 168-173. Kaden Verlag, Heidelberg.
16. Heijl A & Krakau CET (1975): An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53: 293-310.
17. Heijl A & Åsman P (1989): Clustering of depressed points in the normal visual field. In: Heijl (ed). Perimetry Update pp 185-189, Proceedings of the 8th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988, Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam.
18. Heijl A, Lindgren A & Lindgren G (1989): Inter-point correlations of deviations of threshold values in normal and glaucomatous visual fields. In: Heijl (ed). Perimetry Update pp 177-183, Proceedings of the 8th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam.
19. Heijl A, Lindgren A & Lindgren G (1989): Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol 108: 130-135.
20. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987): A package for the statistical analysis of computerized visual fields. In: Greve & Heijl (eds). Documenta Ophthalmol proc series 49: 153-168, Proceedings of the 7th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
21. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987): Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 1544-1549.
22. Holmin C & Krakau CET (1979): Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 210: 235-250.
23. Johnson CA, Chauhan BC & Shapiro LR (1992): Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:2966-2974.
24. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC & Supowit A (1994): Efficient and unbiased modifications of the Quest threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res 34: 885-912.
25. Mills RP, Barnebey HS, Migliazzo CV & Li Y (1994): Does saving time using Fastpac or supra threshold testing reduce quality of visual fields? Ophthalmology 101: 1596-1603.
26. O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy D, Wu J & Hitchings R (1994): Evaluation of the Humphrey Fastpac threshold program in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 78: 513-514.
27. Olsson J (1991) Thesis: Statistics in perimetry. Dept of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, Sweden, p 20.
28. Olsson J & Rootzén H (1994): An image model for quantal response analysis in perimetry. Scand J Stat 21:375-387.
29. Olsson J, Rootzén H & Heijl A (1988): Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of false positive and false negative answers from the up-and-down staircases of computerized threshold perimetry. In: Heijl (ed). Perimetry Update 1988/89 pp 245-251, proceedings of the 8th International Perimetric Society Meeting. Kugler & Ghedini Publications, Amsterdam.
30. Olsson J, Bengtsson B, Heijl A & Rootzén H (1995): New algorithms for automated static perimetry. In: Mills & Wall (eds). Perimetry Update 1994/95 p. 265, Proceedings of the 11th International Perimetric Society Meeting. Kugler & Ghedini Publications, Amsterdam.
31. Olsson J, Bengtsson B, Heijl A & Rootzén H (1997): An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75: 181-183.
32. Olsson J, Heijl A. Bengtsson B & Rootzén H (1993): Frequency-of-seeing in computerized perimetry. In: Mills (ed). Perimetry Update pp. 551-556. Proceedings of the 10th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1992. Kugler, Amsterdam.
33. Schaumberger M, Schafer B & Lachenmayr BJ (1995): Glaucomatous visual fields. Fastpac versus Full Threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 1390-1397.
34. Statpac, Users Guide (1986). Allergan Humphrey, San Leandro, CA.
35. Vivell PM Lachenmayr BJ & Zimmerman P (1991): Comparative study of various per imetry strategies. Fortschr Ophthalmol 88: 819-823.
36. Watson AB & Pelli DG (1983): Quest: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics 33: 113-120.
37. Weber J (1990): A new strategy for automated perimetry. Fortschr Ophthalmol 87: 37-40.
38. Weber J & Klimaschka T (1994): Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry. Ger J Ophthalmol 4: 25-31.
39. Weber J & Rau S (1992): The properties of perimetric thresholds in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ger J Ophthalmol 1:79-85.
40. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Davis P, Krupin T, Petrig B & Sherman C (1987): Visual field variability in stable glaucoma patients. In: Greve & Heijl (eds). Documenta Ophthalmol proc series 49: 77-84, Proceedings of the 7th International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.