Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

Volumn 49, Issue , 2008, Pages 209-246

  Ferreira, Victor S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049162367     PISSN: 00797421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00006-6     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., and van Rijn H. The celex lexical database (1993), Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia
2. Bever T.G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Hayes J.R. (Ed). Cognition and the development of language (1970), John Wiley, New York
3. Bock J.K. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89 (1982) 1-47
4. Bock J.K. Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12 (1986) 575-586
5. Bolinger D. That's that (1972), Mouton, The Hague
6. Bradley D., Fernandez E.M., and Taylor D. Prosodic weight versus information load in the relative clause attachment ambiguity. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Boston, MA (2003)
7. Clark H.H. Using language (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
8. Ferreira F., and Henderson J.M. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990) 555-568
9. Ferreira V.S. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying "that" is not saying "that" at all. Journal of Memory and Language 48 2 (2003) 379-398
10. Ferreira V.S., and Dell G.S. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology 40 4 (2000) 296-340
11. Ferreira V.S., and Firato C.E. Proactive interference effects on sentence production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 795-800
12. Ferreira V.S., Slevc L.R., and Rogers E.S. How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?. Cognition 96 (2005) 263-284
13. Frazier L., and Fodor J.D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6 (1978) 291-325
14. Garnsey S.M., Pearlmutter N.J., Myers E., and Lotocky M.A. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 58-93
15. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J.L. (Eds). Syntax and semantics: Speech act Vol. 3 (1975), Academic Press, New York 41-58
16. Hawkins J.A. A performance theory of order and constituency (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
17. Haywood S.L., Pickering M.J., and Branigan H.P. Do speakers avoid ambiguity during dialogue?. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 362-366
18. Kraljic T., and Brennan S.E. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee?. Cognitive Psychology 50 (2005) 194-231
19. Landauer T.K., and Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104 2 (1997) 211-240
20. Levinson S.C. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Lombardi L., and Potter M.C. The regeneration of syntax in short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language 31 (1992) 713-733
22. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., and Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 4 (1994) 676-703
23. Roland D.W., Elman J.L., and Ferreira V.S. Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition 98 (2006) 245-272
24. Sachs J.S. Recognition of semantic, syntactic, and lexical changes in sentences. Psychonomic Bulletin 1 (1967) 17-18
25. Snedeker J., and Trueswell J.C. Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory & Language 48 1 (2003) 103-130
26. Temperley D. Ambiguity avoidance in English relative clauses. Language 79 (2003) 464-484
27. Thompson S.A., and Mulac A. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15 (1991) 237-251
28. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 285-318
29. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 528-553
30. Wasow T. End-weight from the speaker's perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26 (1997) 347-361
31. Yaguchi M. The function of the non-deictic that in English. Journal of Pragmatics 33 7 (2001) 1125-1155
32. Yamashita H., and Chang F. "Long before short" preference in the production of a head-final language. Cognition 81 (2001) B45-B55