Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 495-527

  Arnold, Jennifer E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 42649131040     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960801920099     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Ariel, M. (1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents, Routledge, London
2. Arnold, J. E. (1998) Reference form and discourse patterns (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, p. 2950.
3. Arnold, J. E. (1999) Marking salience: The similarity of topic and focus
4. Arnold, J. E. (2001) The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31, pp. 137-162.
5. Arnold, J. E. (2003) Multiple constraints on reference form: Null, pronominal, and full reference in Mapudungun. Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, John Benjamins, Philadelphia
6. Arnold, J. E., Bennetto, L. and Diehl, J. J. (2007) Reference production in young speakers with and without Autism: Effects of discourse status and processing constraints
7. Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S. and Trueswell, J. C. (2007) Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, pp. 1-40.
8. Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S. and Trueswell, J. C. (2000) The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye tracking. Cognition, 76, pp. B13-B26.
9. Arnold, J. E. and Griffin, Z. (2007) The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone competes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 521-536.
10. Arnold, J. E., Kam, C. Hudson and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007) If you say "thee uh-" you're describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, pp. 914-930.
11. Arnold, J. E. and Tanenhaus, M. K. The processing and acquisition of reference, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. and Fagnano, M. (2004) The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, pp. 578-582.
13. Arnold, J. E., Trueswell, J. C. and Lawentmann, S. M. (1999) Using common ground to resolve referential ambiguity
14. Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Asudeh, A. and Alrenga, P. (2004) Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, pp. 55-70.
15. Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Losongco, A. and Ginstrom, R. (2000) Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76, pp. 28-55.
16. Bailey, K. G. D. and Ferreira, F. (2003) Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, pp. 183-200.
17. Balota, D. A., Boland, J. E. and Shields, L. W. (1989) Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28:1, pp. 14-36.
18. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H. and Sotillo, C. (2000) Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42:1, pp. 1-22.
19. Bard, E. G. and Aylett, M. P. (1999) The dissociation of deaccenting, givenness and syntactic role in spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Science, pp. 1753-1756.
20. Bard, E. G. and Aylett, M. P. (2004) Referential form, word duration, and modeling the listener in spoken dialogue. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions, pp. 173-191. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Barr, D. J. (2001) Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication, pp. 597-600. L'Harmattan, Paris
22. Bell, A. (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13:2, pp. 145-204.
23. Bell, A., Gregory, M., Brenier, J., Jurafsky, D., Ikeno, A. and Girand, C. (2002) Which predictability measures affect content word durations?. Proceedings of ISCA tutorial and research workshop on pronunciation modeling and lexicon adaptation for spoken language, pp. 1-5.
24. Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M. and Gildea, D. (2003) Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, pp. 1001-1024.
25. Bennetto, L., Diehl, J. J. and Arnold, J. E. (2007) Local and global planning in the narratives of children with high-functioning autism
26. Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. (1994) Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 93-102. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley
27. Bock, J. K. (1982) Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, pp. 1-47.
28. Bock, J. K. (1986) Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, pp. 575-586.
29. Bock, J. K. and Irwin, D. F. (1980) Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, pp. 467-484.
30. Bolinger, D. (1963) Length, vowel, juncture. Linguistics, 1, pp. 5-29.
31. Bolinger, D. (1981) Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm". Bloomington. Indiana University Linguistics Club
32. Bolinger, D. (1986) Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
33. Bower, G. H. and Morrow, D. G. (1990) Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247:4938, pp. 44-48.
34. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R. and Franks, J. J. (1972) Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3:2, pp. 193-209.
35. Brennan, S. E. (1995) Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 102, pp. 137-167.
36. Brennan, S. E. and Clark, H. H. (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22:6, pp. 1482-1493.
37. Brennan, S. E., Friedman, M. W. and Pollard, C. J. (1987) A centering approach to pronouns. Proceedings from the 25th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 155-162. San Francisco, CA
38. Brennan, S. E. and Schober, M. E. (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, pp. 274-296.
39. Brown, G. (1983) Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. Prosody, models, and measurements, Springer-Verlag, New York
40. Brown, P. M. and Dell, G. S. (1987) Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19:4, pp. 441-472.
41. Brown-Schmidt, S., Campana, E. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005) Real-time reference resolution by native participants during a task-based unscripted conversation. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language as product and language as action traditions, MIT Press, Boston
42. Brown-Schmidt, S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006) Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, pp. 592-609.
43. Brown-Schmidt, S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science
44. Chafe, W. L. (1974) Language and consciousness. Language, 50, pp. 111-133.
45. Chafe, W. L. (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. Subject and topic, pp. 25-56. Academic Press, New York
46. Chafe, W. L. (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time, Chicago University Press, Chicago
47. Chambers, C. and Smyth, R. (1998) Structural parallelism and attentional focus: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, pp. 593-608.
48. Clancy, P. M. (1980) Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, pp. 127-202. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
49. Clark, H. H. (1996) Using language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
50. Clark, H. H. and Tree, J. E. Fox (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, pp. 73-111.
51. Clark, H. H. and Krych, M. A. (2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, pp. 62-81.
52. Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. R. (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. Elements of discourse understanding, pp. 10-63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
53. Clark, H. H. and Wasow, T. (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, pp. 201-242.
54. Clark, H. H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, pp. 1-30.
55. Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J. and Donaldson, D. I. (2007) It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect the language comprehension. Cognition, 105, pp. 658-668.
56. Ehrlich, K. (1980) Comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, pp. 247-255.
57. Eckert, P. (2004) The meaning of style. Texas Linguistics Forum, 47, Texas Linguistic Forum, Austin, TX
58. Ferreira, F. and Bailey, K. G. D. (2004) Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, pp. 231-237.
59. Ferreira, V. S. (2003) The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying 'that' is not saying 'that' at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, pp. 379-398.
60. Ferreira, V. S. and Dell, G. S. (2000) Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, pp. 296-340.
61. Ferreira, V. S. and Firato, C. E. (2002) Proactive interference effects on sentence production. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9:4, pp. 795-800.
62. Ferreira, V. S. and Yoshita, H. (2003) Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32:6, pp. 669-692.
63. Ferreira, V. S., Slevc, L. R. and Rogers, E. S. (2005) How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?. Cognition, 96, pp. 263-284.
64. Fowler, C. (1988) Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech, 28, pp. 47-56.
65. Fowler, C. and Housum, J. (1987) Talkers' signalling of 'new' and 'old' words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, pp. 489-504.
66. Fowler, C., Levy, E. and Brown, J. (1997) Reductions of spoken words in certain discourse contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, pp. 24-40.
67. Tree, J. E. Fox and Clark, H. H. (1997) Pronouncing 'the' as 'thee' to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62, pp. 151-167.
68. Francik, E. P. (1985) Referential choice and focus of attention in narratives (discourse anaphora, topic continuity, language production) (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46:4, p. 1363.
69. Fussell, S. R. and Krauss, R. M. (1989) The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25:3, pp. 203-219.
70. Fussell, S. R. and Krauss, R. M. (1989) Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19:6, pp. 509-525.
71. Fussell, S. R. and Krauss, R. M. (1992) Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, pp. 378-391.
72. Gahl, S. and Garnsey, S. M. (2004) Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language, 80, pp. 748-775.
73. Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J. and Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, pp. 517-543.
74. Garrod, S. and Anderson, A. (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27:2, pp. 181-218.
75. Gennari, S. and MacDonald, M. C. (2006) Acquisition of negation and quantification: Insights from adult production and comprehension. Language Acquisition, 13:2, pp. 125-168.
76. Gernsbacher, M. A. and Hargreaves, D. J. (1988) Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp. 699-717.
77. Givón, T. (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, pp. 1-42. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam
78. Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M. and Weisberg, R. (1966) Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3:4, pp. 333-342.
79. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech, Academic Press, London
80. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. and Gilliom, L. A. (1993) Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, pp. 311-347.
81. Gregory, M. L., Healy, A. F. and Jurafsky, D. (2001) Common ground in production: Effects of mutual knowledge on word duration
82. Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E. and Jurafsky, D. (1999) The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistics Society, 35, pp. 151-166.
83. Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W. and Caramazza, A. (1978) Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 6, pp. 117-133.
84. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K. and Weinstein, S. (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the Local Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21:2, pp. 203-225.
85. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, pp. 175-204.
86. Gundel, J. K. (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. Studies in syntactic typology, pp. 209-239. J. Benjamins Publishing Co, Philadelphia, PA
87. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. and Zacharski, R. (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions. Language, 69, pp. 274-307.
88. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K. and Trueswell, J. C. (2003) The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49:1, pp. 43-61.
89. Haywood, S. L., Pickering, M. J. and Branigan, H. P. (2005) Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?. Psychological Science, 16:5, pp. 362-366.
90. Hirschberg, J. (1993) Pitch accent in context: Predicting intonational prominence from text. Artificial Intelligence, 63:12, pp. 305-340.
91. Hirschberg, J. and Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986) The intonational structuring of discourse. Proceedings from the 24th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 136-144. San Francisco
92. Horton, W. S. and Gerrig, R. J. (2005) Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, pp. 1-35.
93. Horton, W. S. and Keysar, B. (1996) When do speakers take into account common ground?. Cognition, 59, pp. 91-117.
94. Isaacs, E. A. and Clark, H. H. (1987) References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116:1, pp. 26-37.
95. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
96. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. and Raymond, W. (2001) Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, pp. 229-254. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
97. Kaiser, E. and Trueswell, J. C. The processing and acquisition of reference, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
98. Kameyama, M. (1996) Indefeasible semantics and defeasible pragmatics. Quantifiers, deduction, and context, pp. 111-138. CSLI, Stanford, CA
99. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985) Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, pp. 61-85.
100. Kehler, A. (2002) Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
101. Kehler, A. and Ward, G. (2004) Constraints on ellipsis and event reference. Handbook of pragmatics, pp. 383-403. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK
102. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A. and Brauner, J. S. (2000) Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, pp. 32-38.
103. Kintsch, W. (1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, pp. 163-182.
104. Kraljic, T. and Brennan, S. E. (2005) Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee?. Cognitive Psychology, 50, pp. 194-231.
105. Ladd, D. R. (1996) Intonational phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
106. Lieberman, P. (1963) Some effects of the semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, pp. 172-175.
107. Lindblom, B. (1990) Explaining variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 403-439. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
108. Lockridge, C. B. and Brennan, S. E. (2002) Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9:3, pp. 550-557.
109. MacDonald, M. C. (1999) Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. The emergence of language, pp. 177-196. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
110. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J. and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, pp. 676-703.
111. Marslen-Wilson, W., Levy, E. and Tyler, L. K. (1982) Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and gesture, pp. 339-378. Wiley, New York
112. McCoy, K. F. and Strube, M. (1999) Taking time to structure discourse: Pronoun generation beyond accessibility. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 378-383. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
113. McDonald, J. and MacWhinney, B. (1995) The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp. 543-566.
114. Metzing, C. and Brennan, S. E. (2003) When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49:2, pp. 201-213.
115. Nadig, A. S. and Sedivy, J. C. (2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13:4, pp. 329-336.
116. Olson, D. R. (1970) Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77:4, pp. 257-273.
117. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, pp. 169-226.
118. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 11, pp. 104-110.
119. Pierrehumbert, J. B. and Hirschberg, J. (1990) The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse. Intentions in communication, pp. 271-311. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
120. Pollack, I. and Pickett, J. (1963) The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech, 6, pp. 165-171.
121. Prince, E. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. Radical pragmatics, pp. 223-255. Academic Press, New York
122. Prince, E. (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, pp. 295-326. Benjamins, Amsterdam
123. Race, D. S. and MacDonald, M. C. (2003) The use of 'that' in the production and comprehension of object relative clauses. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 946-951. Mahwah, NJ
124. Sanford, A. J. and Garrod, S. C. (1981) Understanding written language, Wiley, Chichester, UK
125. Schafer, A., Speer, S., Warren, P. and White, S. (2000) Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, pp. 169-182.
126. Schober, M. F. and Brennan, S. E. (2003) Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. Handbook of discourse processes, pp. 123-164. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
127. Sedivy, J. C. (2003) Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, pp. 3-23.
128. Sheldon, A. (1974) The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, pp. 272-281.
129. Snedeker, J. and Trueswell, J. C. (2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, pp. 103-130.
130. Springston, J. A. (1975) Some cognitive aspects of presupposed coreferential anaphora (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 36:9, p. 4740.
131. Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A. and Kleinman, D. (1994) Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, pp. 473-592.
132. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J. and Sanford, A. J. (2000) The role of implicit causality in language comprehension: Focus versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, pp. 423-443.
133. Tanenhaus, M. K. and Trueswell, J. C. (1995) Sentence comprehension. The handbook of perception and cognition: Volume 11, pp. 217-262. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
134. Terken, J. and Hirschberg, J. (1994) Deaccentuation of words representing 'given' information: Effects of persistence of grammatical function and surface position. Language and Speech, 37, pp. 125-145.
135. Van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension, Academic Press, New York
136. Venditti, J. J. and Hirschberg, J. (2003) Intonation and discourse. Invited panel presentation, "Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Science, pp. 107-114. Barcelona
137. Vonk, W., Hustinx, L. G. and Simons, W. H. (1992) The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Special Issue: Discourse Representation and Text Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 73, pp. 301-333.
138. Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K. and Prince, E. F. (1998) Centering theory in discourse, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
139. Lane, L. Wardlow, Groisman, M. and Ferreira, V. S. (2006) Don't talk about pink elephants! Speakers' control over leaking private information during language production. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 273-277.
140. Wasow, T. (1997) End-weight from the speaker's perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, pp. 347-361.
141. Wasow, T. and Arnold, J. E. (2003) Postverbal constituent ordering in English. Determinants of grammatical variation in English, pp. 120-154. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
142. Wasow, T., Jaeger, T. F. and Orr, D. Lexical variation in relativizer frequency. Proceedings of the 2005 DGfS workshop "Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar"
143. Watson, D. G. and Arnold, J. E. (2005) Not just given and new: The effects of discourse and task-based constraints on acoustic prominence.
144. Watson, D. G., Arnold, J. E. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008) Tic tac TOE: Effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production. Cognition, 106, pp. 156-157.
145. Wolters, M. and Beaver, D. (2001) What does he mean?. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, London, UK
146. Zipf, G. K. (1929) Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 40, pp. 1-95.
147. Zwaan, R. A. and Radvansky, G. A. (1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123:2, pp. 162-185.