Sensory profiling and characterization of chocolate peanut spread using response surface methodology

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 243-274

  Chu, C A ^a   Resurreccion, A V A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 24644469634     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00023.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ABDULLAH, A., MALUNDO, T.M.M., RESURRECCION, A.V.A. and BEUCHAT, L.R. 1993. Descriptive sensory profiling for optimizing the formula of a peanut milk-based liquid coffee whitener. J. Food Sci. 58, 120-123.
2. ASTM COMMITTEE, E-18. 1981. Guidelines for the Selection and Training of Sensory Panel Members. American Society for Testing and Materials, STP 758, Philadelphia, PA.
3. BUCKHOLTZ, L.L., Jr, DAUN, H., STIER, E. and TROUT, R. 1980. Influence of roasting time on sensory attributes of fresh roasted peanuts. J. Food Sci. 45, 547-554.
4. CHAMBERS, E. and WOLF, M.B. 1996. Sensory Testing Methods, 2nd Ed., pp. 58-72, American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. CHU, C. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 2004. Optimization of a chocolate peanut spread using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Sens. Stud. 19, 237-260.
6. CIVILLE, G.V. and LYON, B.G. 1996. Aroma and Flavor Lexicon for Sensory Evaluation Terms, Definitions, References, and Examples, pp. 57-151, ASTM data series publication, DS 66, Madison, WI.
7. CIVILLE, G.V. and SZCZESNIAK, A.S. 1973. Guidelines to training a texture profile panel. J. Text. Stud. 4, 204-223.
8. CORNELL, J.A. 1971. Process variables in the mixture problems for categorized components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 42-48.
9. CORNELL, J.A. 1990. Experiments with Mixtures Design, Models, and Analysis with Mixture Data, 2nd Ed., pp. 21-98, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. CORNELL, J.A. 2000. Developing mixture models, are we done? J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 66, 127-144.
11. EINSTEIN, M.A. 1991. Descriptive techniques and their hybridization. In Sensory Science Theory and Applications in Foods (H.T. Lawless and B.P. Klein, eds.) pp. 317-338, Marcel Dekker, New York.
12. GALVEZ, F.C.F., RESURRECCION, A.V. and WARE, G.O. 1994. Process variables, gelatinized starch and moisture effects on physical properties of mungbean noodles. J. Food Sci. 59, 373-377.
13. GILLS, L.A. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 2000. Sensory and physical properties of peanut butter treated with palm oil and hydrogenated vegetable oil to prevent oil separation. J. Food Sci. 65, 173-180.
14. GROSSO, N.R. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 2002. Predicting consumer acceptance ratings of cracker-coated and roasted peanuts from descriptive analysis and hexanal measurements. J. Food Sci. 67, 1530-1537.
15. GUINARD, J. and MAZZUCCHELLI, R. 1999. Effects of sugar and fat on the sensory properties of milk chocolate: Descriptive analysis and instrumental measurements. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79, 1331-1339.
16. HARE, L.B. 1979. Designs for mixture experiments involving process variables. Technometrics 21, 159-173.
17. HOLT, S.D., RESURRECCION, A.V.A. and MCWATTERS, K.H. 1992. Formulation, evaluation and optimization of tortillas containing wheat, cowpea and peanut flours using mixture response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. 57, 121-127.
18. JOHNSEN, P.B., CIVILLE, G.V., VERCELLOTTI, J.R., SANDERS, T.H. and DUS, C.A. 1988. Development of a lexicon for the description of peanut flavor. J. Sens. Stud. 3, 9-17.
19. LEE, C.M. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 2001. Improved correlation between sensory and instrumental measurement of peanut butter texture. J. Food Sci. 67, 1939-1949.
20. MCNEILL, K.L., SANDERS, T.H. and CIVILLE, G.V. 2002. Descriptive analysis of commercially available creamy style peanut butters. J. Sens. Stud. 17, 391-414.
21. MEILGAARD, M.D., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., pp. 187-236, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. MORRIS, N.J. and FREEMAN, A.F. 1954. Peanut butter. VI. The effect of roasting on the palatability of peanut butter. Food Technol. 8, 377-380.
23. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1995. One practitioner's overview to applied product optimization. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 75-81.
24. MUEGO, K.F., KOEHLER, P.E. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 1990. Effect of temperature, time and number of water extractions on the physicochemical and flavor characteristics of peanuts. J. Food Sci. 55, 790-792.
25. PLEMMONS, L.E. and RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 1998. A warm-up sample improves reliability of responses in descriptive analysis. J. Sens. Stud. 13, 359-376.
26. POWERS, J.J. 1988. Uses of multivariate methods in screening and training sensory panelists. Food Technol. 42(11), 128-136.
27. REVOREDO, C.L. and FLETCHER, S.M. 2002. World peanut market: An overview of the past 30 years. University of Georgia. Research Bulletin 437, May 2002.
28. SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Vol 2, 4th Ed., SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
29. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J.L. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd Ed., pp. 271-309, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.