Research into practice: Written corrective feedback

Language Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 108-119

  Lee, Icy ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870527779     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444812000390     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second LanguageWriting 17.2, 102-118
2. Bitchener, J. & D. R. Ferris (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge
3. Bitchener, J. &U.Knoch (2008). The value of written corrective feedback formigrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12.3, 409-431
4. Bitchener, J. & U. Knoch (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 63.3, 204-211
5. Bitchener, J. & U. Knoch (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics 31.2, 193-214
6. Bitchener, J., S. Young & D. Cameron (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14.3, 191-205
7. Brown, D. (2010). Reshaping the value of grammatical feedback on L2 writing using colors. Paper presented at the International TESOL Convention, March 2010, Boston, MA.
8. Bruton, A. (2009). Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were . . . System 37.4, 600-613
9. Burstein, J., M. Chodorow & C. Leacock (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service. AI Magazine 25.3, 27-36
10. Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 9.1, 53-63
11. Chandler, J. (2000). The efficacy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, March 2000, Vancouver, BC.
12. Chandler, J. (2004). A Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4, 345-348
13. Chandler, J. (2009). Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 18.1, 57-58
14. Chappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. Boston, MA: Pearson.
15. Cohen, A. D. & M. Robbins (1976). Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' expectations. Language Learning 26, 45-66
16. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5, 161-170
17. Curriculum Development Council (1999). Syllabuses for secondary schools: English language Secondary 1-5. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer
18. El Ebyary, K. & S. Windeatt (2010). The impact of computer-based feedback on students' written work. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 121-142
19. Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 335-349
20. Ellis, R., Y. Sheen,M.Murakami & H. Takashima (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36.3, 353-371
21. Esteban, N.M. & J. R. de Larios (2010). The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 143-170
22. Evans,N.W.,K. J.Hartshorn,R.M.McCollum&M.Wolfersberger (2010).Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 14.4, 445-463
23. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 33-53
24. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31.2, 315-339
25. Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 8.1, 1-11
26. Ferris, D. R. (2001). Teaching writing for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 298-314
27. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press
28. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The 'grammar correction' debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime. . .?) Journal of Second LanguageWriting 13.1, 49-62
29. Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and longterm effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81-104
30. Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 181-201
31. Ferris, D. R. & B. Roberts (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10.3, 161-184
32. Frantzen, D. & D. Rissell (1987). Learner self-correction of written compositions. What does it show us? In B. VanPatten, T. R. Dvorak & J. F. Lee (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective. Cambridge, MA: Oewbury House, 92-107
33. Hobbs, G. (2001). Academic journal publishing: past, present and future. Journal of Education for Teaching 27.3, 215-219
34. Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 171-182
35. Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal 66.2, 140-149
36. Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction inwriting: Some implications for teaching. System 25.4, 465-477
37. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4, 285-312
38. Lee, I. (2008).Understanding teachers' written feedback practices inHongKong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.2, 69-85
39. Lee, I. (2010). What about a feedback revolution in the writing classroom? Modern English Teacher 19.2, 46-49
40. Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
41. Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123-139
42. Murphy, L. & J. R. de Larios (2010). Feedback in second language writing: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, i-xv.
43. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10.1, 52-79
44. Robb, T., S. Ross & I. Shortreed (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20.1, 83-95
45. Schmidt, R. W. & S. N. Frota (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Oewbury House, 237-326
46. Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press
47. Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 203-234
48. Sheen, Y., D. Wright & A. Moldawa (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37.4, 556-569
49. Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 29-46
50. Storch,N. &G.Wigglesworth (2010). Learners' processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 303-334
51. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327-369
52. Truscott, J. (1997). A problem and a non-problem for English learners. English Teaching and Learning 22.5, 59-67
53. Truscott, J. (2010). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton's critique of the correction debate. System 38.4, 626-633
54. Truscott, J. & A. Y.-P. Hsü(2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.4, 292-305
55. Van Beuningen, C. G. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 1-27
56. Van Beuningen, C. G., N. H. De Jong & F. Kuiken (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156, 279-296
57. Van Beuningen, C. G., N. H. De Jong & F. Kuiken (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62.1, 1-41
58. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19.1, 79-101