Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals

Gait and Posture

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 113-120

  Kao, Pei Chun ^a   Srivastava, Shraddha ^a   Agrawal, Sunil K ^a   Scholz, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Force field; Gait; Locomotion; Rehabilitation; Robotic exoskeleton

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXOSKELETON; FEMALE; FORCE; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; TREADMILL EXERCISE; VELOCITY; WALKING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; GAIT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84870293720     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hidler J., Hamm L.F., Lichy A., Groah S.L. Automating activity-based interventions: the role of robotics. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2008, 45:337-344.
2. Hesse S., Schmidt H., Werner C., Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Current Opinion in Neurology 2003, 16:705-710.
3. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Emken J.L., Cramer S.C. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2004, 6:497-525.
4. Smania N., Bonetti P., Gandolfi M., Cosentino A., Waldner A., Hesse S., et al. Improved gait after repetitive locomotor training in children with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011, 90:137-149.
5. Westlake K.P., Patten C. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2009, 6:18.
6. Hidler J., Nichols D., Pelliccio M., Brady K., Campbell D.D., Kahn J.H., et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 23:5-13.
7. Hornby T.G., Campbell D.D., Kahn J.H., Demott T., Moore J.L., Roth H.R. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008, 39:1786-1792.
8. Nooijen C.F., Ter Hoeve N., Field-Fote E.C. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in individuals with SCI regardless of training approach. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2009, 6:36.
9. Marchal-Crespo L., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2009, 6:20.
10. Huang V.S., Krakauer J.W. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2009, 6.
11. Banala S.K., Kim S.H., Agrawal S.K., Scholz J.P. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). 10th IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics 2007, 2-8.
12. Emken J.L., Benitez R., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2007, 4.
13. Duschau-Wicke A., von Zitzewitz J., Caprez A., Lunenburger L., Riener R. Path control: a method for patient-cooperative robot-aided gait rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2010, 18:38-48.
14. Cai L.L., Fong A.J., Otoshi C.K., Liang Y., Burdick J.W., Roy R.R., et al. Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:10564-10568.
15. Krakauer J.W. Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2009, 629:405-421.
16. Ziegler M.D., Zhong H., Roy R.R., Edgerton V.R. Why variability facilitates spinal learning. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:10720-10726.
17. Emken J.L., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2005, 13:33-39.
18. Emken J.L., Benitez R., Sideris A., Bobrow J.E., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97:3997-4006.
19. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Akoner O., Ferris D.P., Gordon K.E. Slacking by the human motor system: computational models and implications for robotic orthoses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009 2009, 2129-2132.
20. Kao P.C., Lewis C.L., Ferris D.P. Invariant ankle moment patterns when walking with and without a robotic ankle exoskeleton. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:203-209.
21. Simon A.M., Brent Gillespie R., Ferris D.P. Symmetry-based resistance as a novel means of lower limb rehabilitation. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:1286-1292.
22. Lam T., Wirz M., Lunenburger L., Dietz V. Swing phase resistance enhances flexor muscle activity during treadmill locomotion in incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008, 22:438-446.
23. Lam T., Pauhl K., Krassioukov A., Eng J.J. Using robot-applied resistance to augment body-weight-supported treadmill training in an individual with incomplete spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy 2011, 91:143-151.
24. Patton J.L., Stoykov M.E., Kovic M., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 168:368-383.
25. Lam T., Anderschitz M., Dietz V. Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 95:766-773.
26. Barthelemy D., Alain S., Grey M.J., Nielsen J.B., Bouyer L.J. Rapid changes in corticospinal excitability during force field adaptation of human walking. Experimental Brain Research 2012, 217:99-115.
27. Banala S.K., Kim S.H., Agrawal S.K., Scholz J.P. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2009, 17:2-8.
28. Kim S.H., Banala S.K., Brackbill E.A., Agrawal S.K., Krishnamoorthy V., Scholz J.P. Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:809-824.
29. Doke J., Donelan J.M., Kuo A.D. Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg. Journal of Experimental Biology 2005, 208:439-445.
30. Milot M.H., Marchal-Crespo L., Green C.S., Cramer S.C., Reinkensmeyer D.J. Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:119-131.
31. Wu M., Landry J.M., Schmit B.D., Hornby T.G., Yen S.C. Robotic resistance treadmill training improves locomotor function in human spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012, 93:782-789.