A preservative-and-fluorescein interaction model for benign multipurpose solution-associated transient corneal hyperfluorescence

Cornea

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1480-1488

  Bright, Frank V ^a   Merchea, Mohinder M ^b   Kraut, Nadine D ^a   Maziarz, E Peter ^b   Liu, X Michael ^b   Awasthi, Alok K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b BAUSCH AND LOMB   (United States)

Author keywords

fluorescein; hyperfluorescence; multipurpose solution; staining

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; DISINFECTANT AGENT; FLUORESCEIN; LIPOSOME; MULTIPURPOSE CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; POLIDRONIUM CHLORIDE; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); PRESERVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; IN VITRO STUDY; MELTING POINT; MEMBRANE COMPONENT; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT CONTACT LENS; TEMPERATURE; TRANSIENT CORNEAL HYPERFLUORESCENCE; VALIDITY;

BIGUANIDES; CELLS, CULTURED; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; DISINFECTANTS; DRUG INTERACTIONS; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; FLUORESCEIN; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION; HUMANS; LIPOSOMES; POLYMERS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 84870252736     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31824a2083     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. von Bayer A. Chem Ber. 1871;5:255-259.
2. Gouzie D, Dodd RP, White DM. Dye-tracing studies in southwestern Missouri, USA: indication of stratigraphic flow control in the Burlington Limestone. Hydrogeology J. 2010;18:1043-1052.
3. Meaney MS, McGuffin VL. Investigation of common fluorophores for the detection of nitrated explosives by fluorescence quenching. Anal Chim Acta. 2008;610:57-67.
4. Duan Y, Liu M, Sun W, et al. Recent progress on synthesis of fluorescein probes. Mini-Rev Org Chem. 2009;6:35-43.
5. Romanchuk KG. Fluorescein. Physiochemical factors affecting its fluorescence. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;26:269-283. (Pubitemid 12117365)
6. Sjöback R, Nygren J, Kubista M. Absorption and fluorescence properties of fluorescein. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 1995;51:L7-L21.
7. Chen FS, Maurice DM. The pH in the precorneal tear film and under a contact lens measured with a fluorescent probe. Exp Eye Res. 1990;50:251-259. (Pubitemid 20081138)
8. Guilbault GG. General aspects of luminescence spectroscopy. In: Guilbault GG, ed. Practical Fluorescence. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1990:1-40.
9. Klonis N, Sawyer WH. Spectral properties of the prototropic forms of fluorescein in aqueous solution. J Fluorescence. 1996;6:147-157. (Pubitemid 126713985)
10. Avrameas S. Coupling of enzymes to proteins with glutaraldehyde. Use of the conjugates for the detection of antigens and antibodies. Immunochemistry. 1969;6:43-52.
11. Talian JC, Olmsted JB, Goldman RD. A rapid procedure for preparing fluorescein-labeled specific antibodies from whole antiserum: its use in analyzing cytoskeletal architecture. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:1277-1282. (Pubitemid 13017128)
12. Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, et al. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995;270:467-470.
13. Jayasena SD. Aptamers: an emerging class of molecules that rival antibodies in diagnostics. Clin Chem. 1999;45:1628-1650. (Pubitemid 29419030)
14. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing? Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:48-54.
15. Feenstra RP, Tseng SC. Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:605-617.
16. Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:30-35.
17. Korb DR, Korb JM. Corneal staining prior to contact lens wearing. J Am Optom Assoc. 1970;41:228-232.
18. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, et al. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:130-141. (Pubitemid 41711032)
19. Begley CG, Barr JT, Edrington TB, et al. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:193-200. (Pubitemid 26112454)
20. Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, et al. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:312-316.
21. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom. 1999;82:4-10.
22. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon KM, et al. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:20-30. (Pubitemid 34101393)
23. Bakkar M, Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, et al. Development of an in-vitro model of solution induced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:E-Abstract 100959.
24. Mokhtarzadeh M, Casey R, Glasgow BJ. Fluorescein punctate staining traced to superficial corneal epithelial cells by impression cytology and confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2127-2135.
25. Thinda S, Sikh PK, Hopp LM, et al. Polycarbonate membrane impression cytology: evidence for fluorescein staining in normal and dry eye corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:406-409.
26. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry. 2008;79:444-454.
27. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:166-174. (Pubitemid 43197020)
28. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:753-761. (Pubitemid 36015140)
29. Dillehay SM, Long B, Cutter GC. A statistical analysis of the staining grid. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2007;22:41-47.
30. Bandamwar KL, Garrett Q, Cheung D, et al. Onset time course of solution induced corneal staining. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:199-201.
31. Kislan T. An evaluation of corneal staining with 2 multipurpose solutions. Optometry. 2008;79:330.
32. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:309-315. (Pubitemid 46624856)
33. Dassanayake NL, Garofalo R, Carey R, et al. Correlating biocide uptake and release profiles with corneal staining and subjective symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E-Abstract 915.
34. Sorbara L, Peterson R, Woods C, et al. Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:92-97.
35. Ward KW. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:8-16.
36. Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S, et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003;26:3-9. (Pubitemid 36348129)
37. Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO, et al. Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea. 2006;25:16-25. (Pubitemid 43031143)
38. Willcox M. Ophthalmic Devices Panel Meeting. Food and Drug Administration Ophthalmic Devices Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration; 2008.
39. Sweeney DF. Are inflammatory events a marker for increased risk of MK? Paper presented at: 32nd Annual Meeting of the British Contact Lens Association; May 29 to June 1, 2008; Birmingham, United Kingdom.
40. Bantseev V, McCanna DJ, Driot JY, et al. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:308-316. (Pubitemid 350098718)
41. Barrett RP, Mowery-McKee M, Hazlett LD. Punctate fluorescein corneal staining observed using polyhexamethylene biguanide containing disinfecting solution not indicative of corneal surface damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E-Abstract 5732.
42. Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Van Der Meid KR, et al. Comparison of the effect of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the viability of cultured corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:171-175.
43. Cavet ME, Van Der Meid KR, Harrington KL, et al. Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(suppl 1):S18-S23.
44. Choy CK, Cho P, Boost MV, et al. Do multipurpose solutions damage porcine corneal epithelial cells? Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:E447-E453.
45. Dutot M, Paillet H, Chaumeil C, et al. Severe ocular infections with contact lens: role of multipurpose solutions. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:470-476.
46. Dutot M, Reveneau E, Pauloin T, et al. Multipurpose solutions and contact lens: modulation of cytotoxicity and apoptosis on the ocular surface. Cornea. 2010;29:541-549.
47. Dutot M, Warnet JM, Baudouin C, et al. Cytotoxicity of contact lens multipurpose solutions: role of oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity and P2X7 cell death receptor activation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;33:138-145.
48. Horwath-Winter J, Simon M, Kölli H, et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation of soft contact lens care solutions on human conjunctival fibroblasts. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218:385-389. (Pubitemid 39551808)
49. Huang LC, Agarwal A, Crawford L. In vitro biocompatibility assessment of contact lens multi-purpose solutions with silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:E-Abstract 1523.
50. Lim MJ, Hurst RK, Konynenbelt BJ, et al. Cytotoxicity testing of multipurpose contact lens solutions using monolayer and stratified cultures of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:287-296.
51. McCanna DJ, Harrington KL, Driot JY, et al. Use of a human corneal epithelial cell line for screening the safety of contact lens care solutions in vitro. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:6-12.
52. Merchea MM, Reindel W, Snyder C, et al. Inflammatory mediators associated with transient, contact lens solution-induced corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:E-Abstract 4851.
53. Tchao R, McCanna DJ, Miller MJ. Comparison of contact lens multipurpose solutions by in vitro sodium fluorescein permeability assay. CLAO J. 2002;28:151-156.
54. Powell CH, Lally JM, Hoong LD, et al. Lipophilic versus hydrodynamic modes of uptake and release by contact lenses of active entities used in multipurpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:9-18.
55. Carnt NA, Evans VE, Holden BA, et al. IER Matrix update: adding another silicone hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2008;23:40-43.
56. Sentell KB, Beaullieu E. Comparison of preservative uptake and release profiles of PHMB from soft contact lens care products by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:E-Abstract 1573.
57. Willcox MD, Phillips B, Ozkan J, et al. Interactions of lens care with silicone hydrogel lenses and effect on comfort. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:839-846.
58. Blackburn RS, Harvey A, Kettle LL, et al. Sorption of poly (hexamethylenebiguanide) on cellulose: mechanism of binding and molecular recognition. Langmuir. 2006;22:5636-5644. (Pubitemid 44013605)
59. Gilbert P, Moore LE. Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99:703-715. (Pubitemid 41399812)
60. Bruinsma GM, Rustema-Abbing M, van der Mei HC, et al. Resistance to a polyquaternium-1 lens care solution and isoelectric points of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:764-766.
61. Paugh JR, Marsden HJ, Edrington TB, et al. A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solutioninduced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:65-71. (Pubitemid 46105022)
62. Vehige JG, Simmons PA, Anger C, et al. Cytoprotective properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) when used prior to wearing contact lenses treated with cationic disinfecting agents. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:177-180. (Pubitemid 43189061)
63. Gibbs DE, Stein JM, Rockett J, et al. Opti-Free chemical disinfectant: a safety study with various soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1989;15:57-60. (Pubitemid 19057498)
64. Morgan JF. Opti-Soft (TM) for the care of soft contact lenses: a triphasic, one-year clinical evaluation. CLAO J. 1987;13:268-271.
65. Perry DL, Turner FD, Stein JM, et al. Clinical comparison of opti-soft chemical to a hydrogen peroxide disinfection system. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1989;16:12-19.
66. Christensen B, Lebow K, White EM, et al. Effectiveness of citratecontaining lens care regimens: a controlled clinical comparison. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1998;25:50-58. (Pubitemid 128360701)
67. Debbasch C, De La Salle SB, Brignole F, et al. Cytoprotective effects of hyaluronic acid and Carbomer 934P in ocular surface epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3409-3415. (Pubitemid 35334347)
68. Muya L, Mowrey-Mckee MF, Minno G, et al. Determination of binding of PHMB to mucin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:E-Abstract 4869.
69. Gipson IK, Argüeso P. Role of mucins in the function of the corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Int Rev Cytol. 2003;231:1-49. (Pubitemid 37549254)
70. Ikeda T, Tazuke S, Watanabe M. Interaction of biologically active molecules with phospholipid membranes. I. Fluorescence depolarization studies on the effect of polymeric biocide bearing biguanide groups in the main chain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;735:380-386.
71. Merchant TE, Lass JH, Roat MI, et al. P-31 NMR analysis of phospholipids from cultured human corneal epithelial, fibroblast and endothelial cells. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:1167-1176.
72. Lasic DD. Liposomes: From Physics to Applications. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Ltd; 1993.
73. Gregoriadis G. Liposome Preparation and Related Techniques. Vol 1. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA Inc; 2007.
74. Wang S, Beechem JM, Gratton E, et al. Orientational distribution of 1, 6-diphenyl-1, 3, 5-hexatriene in phospholipid vesicles as determined by global analysis of frequency domain fluorimetry data. Biochemistry. 1991;30:5565-5572.
75. Lentz BR, Barenholz Y, Thompson TE. Fluorescence depolarization studies of phase transitions and fluidity in phospholipid bilayers. 1. Single component phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Biochemistry. 1976;15:4521-4528.
76. Shinitzky M, Barenholz Y. Dynamics of the hydrocarbon layer in liposomes of lecithin and sphingomyelin containing dicetylphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:2652-2657.
77. Lakowicz JR. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
78. Ingersoll CM, Strollo CM. Steady-state fluorescence anisotropy to investigate flavonoids binding to proteins. J Chem Educ. 2007;84:1313-1315. (Pubitemid 47208715)
79. Kessel L, Johnson L, Arvidsson H, et al. The relationship between body and ambient temperature and corneal temperature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6593-6597.
80. Morgan PB, Soh MP, Efron N, et al. Potential applications of ocular thermography. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:568-576. (Pubitemid 23205023)
81. Ooi EH, Ng EY, Purslow C, et al. Variations in the corneal surface temperature with contact lens wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221:337-349. (Pubitemid 46958910)
82. Efron N, Young G, Brennan NA. Ocular surface temperature. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:901-906. (Pubitemid 19229744)
83. Nichols JJ. Contact lenses 2010. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2011;26:24-28.
84. Labbé A, Pauly A, Liang H, et al. Comparison of toxicological profiles of benzalkonium chloride and polyquaternium-1: an experimental study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006;22:267-278. (Pubitemid 44689667)
85. Levy B. Superficial corneal "staining" - clinical observation and risk assessment. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:165-166. (Pubitemid 47106555)
86. Chang DC, Grant GB, O'Donnell K, et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA. 2006;296:953-963. (Pubitemid 44285372)
87. Hom MM. Commenting on the FDA Panel Meeting on lens solutions. Readers' forum. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2008;23:50-51.
88. Paugh JR, Nguyen AL, Hall JQ Jr, et al. A preliminary study of silicone hydrogel lens material and care solution bioincompatibilities. Cornea. 2011;30:772-779.
89. Tam C, Mun JJ, Evans DJ, et al. The impact of inoculation parameters on the pathogenesis of contact lens-related infectious keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3100-3106.
90. Levy B. Infectious keratitis: what have we learned? Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(6 pt 2):418-420; discussion 424-425. (Pubitemid 350059567)
91. Sacco AJ. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses, lens care and sterile infiltrates: is there a connection? Paper presented at: Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 27-30, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
92. Sacco AJ. Contact lens-associated infiltrative keratitis and multipurpose solutions. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2011;26:40-45.
93. Reeder R. Trends associated with corneal infiltrative events in soft lens wearers. Paper presented at: Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 27-30, 2011; Las Vegas, NV.
94. Diec J, Evans VE, Naduvilath TJ. Performance of polyquad, PHMB and peroxide solutions with silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:E-Abstract 5633.
95. Carnt NA, Evans VE, Naduvilath TJ, et al. Contact lens-related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1616-1623.
96. Kislan TP. Case characteristics of persons presenting with contact lens-associated infiltrative keratitis (CLAIK) with multipurpose solutions and contact lens combinations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:E-Abstract 6521.
97. Kislan TP, Hom MM. Corneal infiltrates with multipurpose solutions and contact lens combinations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:E-Abstract 3424.