Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 92-97

  Sorbara, Luigina ^a   Peterson, Rachael ^a   Woods, Craig ^a   Fonn, Desmond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Care regimen; Contact lens; Corneal staining; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; MENICARE SOFT; OPTIFREE REPLENISH; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); RENU MULTIPLUS; SOLO CARE AQUA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLISTER PACK; BURNING SENSATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEAL STAINING; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISINFECTION; DRY EYE; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; EYE BURN; EYE CARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SILICONE HYDROGEN LENS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SOFT CONTACT LENS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN; SILICONE GELS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STAINING AND LABELING; TIME FACTORS; XEROPHTHALMIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68549111320     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318199df54     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Christensen B, Lebow K, White E, et al. The clinical benefits of specially formulated contact lens cleaners and multipurpose solutions. Optometry Today (UK) 1997;37:33-37.
2. Mummert R. Trends in lens care. Contact Lens Spectrum 1998;13:4s-8s.
3. Amos C, Loveridge R. No rub, no rinse: A new line in multipurpose solutions. Optician 2002;224:37-40.
4. Christie C. Solutions: Same or different? Optician 1999;218:20-24.
5. Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S, et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2003;26:3-9.
6. Stiegemeier MJ, Cedrone R, Evans D, et al. Clinical performance of 'no rub' multi-purpose solutions. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:65-74.
7. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Knsjian R, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2007. Contact Lens Spectrum 2008;22:34-41.
8. Begley CG, Edrington TB, Chalmers RL. Effect of lens care systems on corneal fluorescein staining and subjective comfort in hydrogel lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994;21:7-13.
9. Cho P, Lui T, Kee C. Soft contact lens care systems and corneal staining in Hong Kong-Chinese. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 1998;21:47-53.
10. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose contact lens solutions. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:23-30.
11. Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:213-220.
12. Heiler DJ. Multi-purpose solutions engineered for compatibility with silicone hydrogel lenses. Rev Optometry 2005;142:6.
13. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara L. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;753-761.
14. Lievens CW, Hakim N, Chinn A. The effect of multipurpose solutions on the ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:8-11.
15. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascues E, Rubido-Crespo MJ, et al. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008;28:373- 381.
16. Zigler L, Cedrone R, Evans D, et al. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:236-243.
17. Amos C. Performance of a new multipurpose solution used with silicone hydrogels. Optician 2004;227:18-22.
18. Mowrey-McKee M, Sills A, Wright A. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lens care regimens. CLAO J 2002;28:160-164.
19. Pham XT, Huff JW. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multipurpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J 1999;25:28-35.
20. Tchao R, McCanna DJ, Miller MJ. Comparison of contact lens multipurpose solutions by in vitro sodium fluorescein permeability assay. CLAO J 2002;28:151-156.
21. Guillon M, Maissa C. Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:5-10.
22. Jones L. Comfilcon A: A new silicone hydrogel material. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:15.
23. Jones L. A new silicone hydrogel lens comes to market. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:10.
24. Terry R, Schnider C, Holden BA, et al. The CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:234-243.
25. Peterson R, Woods CA, Fonn D. Comparing the CCLR grading system for corneal staining to a traditional 0 to 4 scale [Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 2008; E-abstract 85324.
26. Woods J, Woods CA, Varikooty J, et al. A novel method of recording corneal staining that facilitates parametric analysis [Abstract]. Optom Vis Sci 2006; E-abstract 065152.
27. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:166-174.
28. Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs. a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:168-173.
29. Carnt N, Willcox MDP, Evans V, et al. Corneal staining: The IER matrix study. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:38-43.
30. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79:444-454.
31. Ward KW. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:8-16.