A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solution-induced corneal staining

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 65-71

  Paugh, Jerry R ^a   Marsden, Harue J ^a   Edrington, Timothy B ^a   Deland, Paul N ^b   Simmons, Peter A ^c   Vehige, Joseph G ^c  

^a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Carboxymethylcellulose; Contact lenses; Polyhexanides; Solution toxicity; Staining

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE (CMC); CORNEAL; POLYHEXANIDES; SOLUTION TOXICITY; STAINING;

CONTACT LENSES; DISINFECTANTS; LUBRICANTS; POSITIVE IONS; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CATION; DISINFECTANT AGENT; FLUORESCEIN; LUBRICATING AGENT; POLYAMINOPROPYL BIGUANIDE; POLYHEXANIDE; POVIDONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DISINFECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STAINING; STUDENT T TEST; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TWO TAILED TEST;

ADULT; BIGUANIDES; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846258192     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000254044.94356.23     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gower LA, Stein JM, Turner FD. Compliance: a comparison of three lens care systems. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:629-34.
2. Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S, Hunt C. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003;26:3-9.
3. Stiegemeier MJ, Cedrone R, Evans D, Friederichs G, Holle D, Jenkins W, Lutzi D, Roberson R, Schenker H, White E, Zigler L. Clinical performance of 'no rub' multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:65-74.
4. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:166-74.
5. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-61.
6. Atkins N, Allsopp G. Multipurpose solution intolerance: diagnosis and management. Optician 1996;212:22-31.
7. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose contact lens solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:23-30.
8. Rosenthal RA, McDonald MM, Schlitzer RL, Abshire R, Stone R. Loss of bactericidal activity from contact lens storage solutions. CLAO J 1997;23:57-62.
9. Vehige J, Currie J (Allergan Inc.). Compositions and methods for enhancing contact lens wearability. U.S. Patent 5,858,346; January 12, 1999.
10. Vehige JG, Simmons PA, Anger C, Graham R, Tran L, Brady N. Cytoprotective properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) when used prior to wearing contact lenses treated with cationic disinfecting agents. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:177-80.
11. Coles ML, Brennan NA, Shuley V, Woods J, Prior C, Vehige JG, Simmons PA. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2004;87:367-71.
12. Courtney RC, Lee JM. Predicting ocular intolerance of a contact lens solution by use of a filter system enhancing fluorescein staining detection. Intern Contact Lens Clinic 1982;9:302-10.
13. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R, Begley C. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea 2002;21:469-75.
14. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-6.
15. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, DuToit R, Portello J, Davis L. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea 2001;20:610-18.
16. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:182-6.
17. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
18. Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:17-29.
19. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. In: Efron N, ed. Contact Lens Complications. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004:239-3.